Photoprotection in moisturizers and daily-care products

Giornale Italiano di Dermatologia e Venereologia

Volumn 145, Issue 5, 2010, Pages 631-636

  Seite, S ^a   Fourtanier, A ^b   Rougier, A ^a  

^a L ORÉAL RECHERCHE   (France)

^b La Roche Posay Pharmaceutical Laboratories   (France)

Author keywords

Moisturizers; Molecular dynamics simulation; Skin aging; Ultraviolet rays

Indexed keywords

INTERSTITIAL COLLAGENASE; MESSENGER RNA; REACTIVE OXYGEN METABOLITE; SKIN MOITURIZER; SKIN PROTECTIVE AGENT; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

ARTICLE; CREAM; DAILY LIFE ACTIVITY; GENE EXPRESSION; HUMAN; OXIDATIVE STRESS; PHOTOAGING; SKIN INJURY; SKIN PIGMENTATION; SKIN PROTECTION; SUN EXPOSURE; ULTRAVIOLET A RADIATION; ULTRAVIOLET B RADIATION;

EID: 78650732247     PISSN: 03920488     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Kaminer MS. Photodamage: magnitude of the problem. In: Gilchrest B, editor. Photodamage. Cambridge: Blackwell Science Inc.; 1995. p. 1-11.
2. Bisset DL, Hannon DP, McBride JF, Patrick LF. Photoaging of skin by UVA. In: Urbach F, editor. Biological response to ultraviolet A radiation. Overland Park, KS; Valdenmar Publishing Cie; 1992. p. 181-8.
3. Kligman AM, Lavker RM. Cutaneous aging: the differences between intrinsic aging and photoaging. J Cut Aging Cosmet Dermatology 1988; 1: 5-11.
4. Lavker RM. Structural alterations in exposed and non exposed human skin. J Invest Dermatol 1979; 73: 59-66.
5. Gilchrest BA, Szabo G, Flynn E. Chronologic and actinically induced aging in human facial skin. J Invest Dermatol 1983; 80: 81-5.
6. Tuchinda C, Srivannaboon S, Lim HW. Photoprotection by window glass, automobile glass and sunglasses. J Am Acad Dermatol 2006; 54: 845-54 (Erratum in 55:74).
7. Godar D. UV doses worldwide. Photochem Photobiol 2005; 81: 736-49.
8. Kullavanijaya P, Lim HW. Photoprotection. J Am Acad Dermatol 2005; 52: 937-58.
9. Seité S, Moyal D, Richard S, De Rigal J, Levêque JL, Hourseau C et al. Effect of repeated suberythemal doses of UVA in human skin. European J Dermatol 1997; 7: 204-9. (Pubitemid 27192275)
10. Lavker RM, Gerberick GF, Veres D, Irwin CJ, Kaidley KH. Cumulative effects from repeated exposures to suberythemal doses of UVB and UVA in human skin. J Am Acad Dermatol 1995; 32: 53-62.
11. Czernielewski JM, Masouye I, Pisani A. Effects of chronic sun exposure on human Langerhans cell densities. Photodermatolog 1999; 5: 116-20.
12. Seité S, Zucchi H, Moyal D, Tison S, Compan D, Christiaens F et al. Alterations in human epidermal Langerhans cells by ultraviolet radiation: Quantitative and morphological study. Br. J Dermatol 2003; 148: 291-9. (Pubitemid 36278971)
13. Trautinger F, Mazzucco K, Knobler RM, Trenz A, Kokoschka EM. UVA- and UVB-induced changes in hairless mouse skin collagen. Arch Dermatol Res 1994; 286: 490-4. (Pubitemid 24324728)
14. Lavker RM, Kligman AM. Chronic heliodermatitis: a morphologic evaluation of chronic actinic damage with emphasis on the role of mast cells. J Invest Dermatol 1988; 90: 325-30.
15. Seitè S, Zucchi H, Igondjo-Tchen S, Senni K, Godeau G. Elastin changes during chronological and photo-ageing: The important role of lysozyme. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol 2006; 20: 980-7. (Pubitemid 44241388)
16. Matsuoka LY, Uitto J. Alterations in the elastic fibers in cutaneous aging and solar elastosis. In: Balin AK, AM Kligman, editors. New York, NY: Ravens press; 1989. p. 141-51.
17. Lavker RM, Gerberick GF, Veres D, Irwin CJ, Kaidley KH. Quantitative assessment of cumulative damage from repetitive exposures to suberythemogenic doses of UVA in human skin. Photochem Photobiol 1995; 62: 348-52.
18. Pathak MA, Dalle Carbonare M. In: Urbach F, editor. Biological response to ultraviolet A radiation. Overland Park, KS; Valdenmar Publishing Company, 1992.p. 189-208.
19. Rougier A, Richard A. In vivo determination of the skin protection capacity of a day-cream by means of ICL-S. Eur J Dermatol 2002; 12: 19-20.
20. Chung J, Cho S, Kang S. Why does the skin age? In: Rigel DS, Weiss RA, Lim HW, Dover JS, editors. Photoaging. New York, NY: Marcel Dekker Inc.; 2004. p. 1-13.
21. Duteil L, Queille-Roussel C, Rougier A, Richard A, Ortonne JP. Chronic UVA exposure: protective effect on skin induced pigmentation by a daily use of a day care cream containing broad band sunscreen. Eur J Dermatol 2002; 12: 17-18.
22. Seité S, Colige A, Piquemal-Vivenot P, Montastier C, Fourtanier A, Lapiere C et al. A Full-UV spectrum absorbing daily use cream protects human skin against biological changes occurring in photoaging. Photodermatol Photoimmunol Photomed 2000; 16: 147-55.
23. Lavker RM. Cutaneous aging: chronologic versus photoaging. In: Gilchrest B, editor. Photodamage. Cambridge: Blackwell Science Inc.; 1995. p. 23-35.
24. Lavker RM, Kaidbey KH. The spectral dependence for UVA-induced cumulative damage in human skin. J Invest Dermatol 1997; 108: 17-21.
25. Seite S, Christiaens F, Bredoux C, Compan D, Zucchi H, Lombard D et al. A broad-spectrum sunscreen prevents cumulative damage from repeated exposure to sub-erythemal solar ultraviolet radiation representative of temperate latitude. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol 2010; 24: 219-22.
26. Seite S, Medaisko C, Christiaens F, Bredoux C, Compan D, Zucchi H et al. Biological effects of simulated ultraviolet daylight: a new approach to investigate daily photoprotection. Photodermatol Photoimmunol Photomed 2006; 2: 67-77. (Pubitemid 44056524)
27. Young AR, Orchard GE, Harrison GI, Klock JL. The detrimental effects of daily sub-erythemal exposure on human skin in vivo can be prevented by a daily-care broad-spectrum sunscreen. J Invest Dermatol 2007; 27: 975-8.