Sober and Elgin on laws of biology: A critique

Biology and Philosophy

Volumn 25, Issue 2, 2010, Pages 249-256

  Desautels, Lane ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND   (United States)

Author keywords

Biology; Contingency; Laws; Modal Force

Indexed keywords

BIOLOGY; PERCEPTION; PHILOSOPHY;

EID: 78650714967     PISSN: 01693867     EISSN: 15728404     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10539-009-9182-x     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Beatty J (1995) The evolutionary contingency thesis. In: Wolters G, Lennox J (eds.), Concepts, theories, and rationality in the biological sciences: The Second Pittsburgh-Konstanz Colloquium in the Philosophy of Science. University of Pittsburgh Press, Pittsburgh
2. Cartwright N (1983) How the laws of physics lie. Clarendon Press, Oxford
3. Earman J, Roberts J (1999) Ceteris paribus, there is no problem of provisos. Synthese 118:439-478
4. Earman J, Roberts J (2002) Ceteris paribus, lost. Erkenntnis 57(3):281-301
5. Elgin M (2006) There may be strict empirical laws in biology, after all. Biol Philos 21:119-134
6. Fodor J (1991) You can fool some of the people all of the time, everything else being equal; hedged laws and psychological explanations. Mind 100:19-34
7. Hausman D (1992) The inexact and separate science of economics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
8. Kripke S (1972) Naming and necessity. Harvard University Press, Cambridge
9. Lange M (2000) Natural laws in scientific practice. Oxford University Press, New York
10. Lange M (2002) Who's afraid of ceteris paribus laws: or: how I learned to stop worrying and love them. Erkenntnis 57:407-423
11. Lewis D (1973) Causation. J Philos 70:556-567
12. Lewis D (1986) On the plurality of worlds. Blackwell, Oxford
13. Mitchell S (1997) Pragmatic laws. Philos Sci 64:468-479
14. Mitchell S (2000) Dimensions of scientific law. Philos Sci 67(2):242-265
15. Mitchell S (2002) Biological contingency and laws. Erkenntnis 57(3):329-350
16. Mitchell S (2003) Biological complexity and integrative pluralism. Cambridge University Press, New York
17. Pietroski P, Rey G (1995) When other things aren't equal: saving ceteris paribus laws from vacuity. Brit J Philos Sci 46:81-110
18. Schiffer S (1991) Ceteris paribus laws. Mind 100:1-17
19. Smart JJC (1963) Philosophy and scientific realism. Routledge & Kegan Paul, London
20. Sober E (1997) Two outbreaks of lawlessness in recent philosophy of biology. Philosophy of Science 64 (Proceedings), pp S458-S467
21. Woodward J (2000) Explanation and invariance in the special sciences. Br J Philos Sci 51(2):197-254
22. Woodward J (2001) Law and explanation in biology: invariance is the kind of stability that matters. Br J Philos Sci 68(1):1-20
23. Woodward J (2002) There is no such thing as a ceteris paribus law. Erkenntnis 57:303-328
24. Woodward J (2003) Making things happen: a theory of causal explanation. Oxford University Press, New York