Deterministic approach to the study of the interaction predator-prey in a chemostat with predator mutual interference. Implications for the paradox of enrichment

Ecological Modelling

Volumn 222, Issue 3, 2011, Pages 598-605

  Cabrera F, María I ^a  

^a FACULTAD DE CIENCIAS VETERINARIAS   (Venezuela)

Author keywords

Chemostat; Contois model; Monod model; Paradox of enrichment; Predator interference; Prey dependence; Ratio dependence

Indexed keywords

CONTOIS MODEL; MONOD MODEL; PARADOX OF ENRICHMENT; PREDATOR INTERFERENCE; PREY-DEPENDENCE; RATIO DEPENDENCE;

DIFFERENTIAL EQUATIONS; ECOSYSTEMS; HOPF BIFURCATION; MAMMALS; QUALITY CONTROL; TIME SERIES;

CHEMOSTATS;

AGE STRUCTURE; CHEMOSTAT; COEXISTENCE; ECOLOGICAL MODELING; PREDATOR-PREY INTERACTION; QUALITATIVE ANALYSIS; REACTION KINETICS;

ALGAE; ROTIFERA;

EID: 78650679422     PISSN: 03043800     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2010.09.008     Document Type: Article

References (70)

1. Arditi R., Saïah H. Empirical evidence of the role of heterogeneity in ratio dependent consumption. Ecology 1992, 73:1544-1551.
2. Arditi R., Berryman A.A. The biological control paradox. Trends Ecol. Evol. 1991, 6:32.
3. Arditi R., Perrin N., Saïah H. Functional responses and heterogeneities: an experimental test with cladocerans. Oikos 1991, 60:69-75.
4. Arditi R., Akakaya H.R. Underestimation of mutual interference of predators. Oecologia 1990, 83:358-361.
5. Arditi R., Ginzburg L.R. Coupling in predator-prey dynamics: ratio dependence. J. Theor. Biol. 1989, 139:311-326.
6. Boraas M.E. Population dynamics of food limited rotifers in two stage chemostat culture. Limnol. Oceanogr. 1983, 28:546-563.
7. Boraas M.E., Seale D.B., Boxhorn J.E., McNair J.N. Rotifer size distribution changes during transient phases in open cultures. Hydrobiologia 1998, 387-388.
8. Burns C.W. Effects of crowding and different food levels on growth and reproductive investment of Daphnia. Oecologia 1995, 101:234-244.
9. Cabrera F M.I. Tasa de crecimiento poblacional del rotífero Brachionus rotundiformis (Rotífera: Brachionidae) en un quimiostato de dos cámaras. Rev. Biol. Trop. 2008, 56:1149-1157.
10. Cabrera F, M.I., 2009. Aproximación determinista al estudio de la relación depredador-presa en un quimiostato. Trabajo de Ascenso, Universidad del Zulia, Maracaibo, Venezuela.
11. Canale R.P. An analysis of models describing predator-prey interaction. Biotech. Bioeng. 1970, 12:353-378.
12. Carlson R.E. A trophic state index for lakes. Limnol. Oceanogr. 1977, 22:361-369.
13. Chattopadhayay J., Sarkarw R.R., Mandalw S. Toxin producing plankton may act as a biological control for planktonic blooms-field study and mathematical modelling. J. Theor. Biol. 2002, 215:333-344.
14. Cleuvers M., Goser B., Ratte H.T. Life strategy shift by intraspecific interaction in Daphnia magna: change in reproduction from quantity to quality. Oecologia 1997, 110:337-345.
15. Contois D.E. Kinetics of bacterial growth: relationship between population density and specific growth rate of continuous cultures. J. Gen. Microbiol. 1959, 21(40):50.
16. Eyster H.C. Nutrient concentration requirements for Chlorella sorokiniana. Ohio J. Sci. 1978, 78:79-81.
17. Fanés, I., 2008. Estudios taxonómicos en algas verdes cocales del sur de España. Tesis Doctoral. Universidad de Granada, España.
18. Free C.A., Beddington J.R., Lawton J.R. On the inadequacy of simple models of mutual interference for parasitism and predation. J. Anim. Ecol. 1977, 46:543-554.
19. Fussmann G.F., Ellner S.P., Shertzer K.W., Hairston N.G. Crossing the Hopf bifurcation in a live predator-prey system. Science 2000, 290:1358-1360.
20. Fussmann G.F., Blasius B. Community response to enrichment is highly sensitive to model structure. Biol. Lett. 2005, 1:9-12.
21. Genkai-Kato M., Yamamura N. Unpalatable prey resolves the paradox of enrichment. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 1999, 266:1215-1219.
22. Goser B., Ratte H.T. Experimental evidence of negative interference in Daphnia magna. Oecologia 1994, 98:354-361.
23. Graham L.E., Wilcox L.W. Algae 2000, Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ, EEUU.
24. Harmand J., Godon J.J. Density-dependent kinetics models for a simple description of complex phenomena in macroscopic mass-balance modeling of bioreactors. Ecol. Model. 2007, 200:393-402.
25. Hassell M.P. Arthropod predator-prey systems. Theoretical Ecology 1981, 105-131. Blackwell Scientific Publications, Oxford, Great Britain. R. May (Ed.).
26. Helgen J.C. Feeding rate inhibition in crowded Daphnia pulex. Hydrobiologia 1987, 154:113-119.
27. Hino A., Auki S., Ushiro M. Nitrogen flow in the rotifer Brachionus rotundiformis and its significance in mass cultures. Hydrobiologia 1997, 358:77-82.
28. Jannasch H.W. Steady state and the chemostat in ecology. Limnol. Oceanogr. 1974, 19:716-720.
29. Jansen V.A.A., Lloyd A.L. Local stability analysis of spatially homogeneous solutions of multi patch systems. J. Math. Biol. 2000, 41:232-252.
30. Jansen V.A.A. The dynamics of two diffusively coupled predator-prey populations. Theor. Popul. Biol. 2001, 59:119-131.
31. Jensen C.X.J., Ginzburg L.R. Paradoxes or theoretical failures? The jury is still out. Ecol. Model. 2005, 188:3-14.
32. Jessup C.M., Forde S.E., Bohannan B.J.M. Microbial experimental systems in ecology. Adv. Ecol. Res. 2005, 37:273-300.
33. Kirk K.L. Enrichment can stabilize population dynamics: autotoxins and density dependence. Ecology 1998, 79:2456-2462.
34. Kooi B.W., Kooijman S.A.L.M. Discrete event versus continuous approach to reproduction in structured population dynamics. Theor. Popul. Biol. 1999, 56:91-105.
35. Kovarova-Kovar K., Egli T. Growth kinetics of suspended microbial cells: from single substrate controlled growth to mixed substrate kinetics. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 1998, 62:646-666.
36. Kratina P., Matthijs V., Bateman A., Anholt B.R. Functional responses modified by predator density. Oecologia 2009, 159:425-433.
37. Lampert W. A directly coupled, artificial two step food chain for long term experiments with filter feeders at constant food concentrations. Mar. Biol. 1976, 37:341-355.
38. McCauley E., Murdoch W.W., Watson S. Simple models and variation in plankton densities among lakes. Am. Nat. 1988, 132:383-403.
39. McCauley E., Nisbet R.M., Murdoch W.W., de Roos A.M., Gurney W.S.C. Large amplitude cycles of Daphnia and its algal prey in enriched environments. Nature 1999, 402:653-656.
40. McNair J.N., Boraas M.E., Seale D.B. Size structure dynamics of the rotifer chemostat: a simple physiologically structured model. Hydrobiologia 1998, 387-388:469-476.
41. Monod J. La technique de culture continue; theorie et applications. Ann. Inst. Pasteur 1950, 79:390-410.
42. Mora R., Moronta R., Ortega J., Morales E. Crecimiento y producción de pigmentos de la microalga nativa Chlorella sp. aislada de la Represa de Tulé, Municipio Mara, Estado Zulia, Venezuela. Cien. Compl. 2004, 12:1-9.
43. Moronta R., Mora R., Morales E. Respuesta de la microalga Chlorella sorokiniana al pH, salinidad y temperatura en condiciones axénicas y no axénicas. Rev. Fac. Agron. 2006, 23:27-41.
44. Murdoch W.W., Nisbet R.M., McCauley E., de Roos A.M., Gurney W.S.C. Plankton abundance and dynamics across nutrient levels: tests of hypotheses. Ecology 1998, 79:1339-1356.
45. Nelson M.I., Holder A. A fundamental analysis of continuous flow bioreactor models governed by Contois kinetics. II. Reactor cascades. Chem. Eng. J. 2009, 149:406-416.
46. Novick A., Szilard L. Description of the chemostat. Science 1950, 112:715-716.
47. Persson A., Hansson L.A., Brönmark C., Lundberg P., Pettersson L.B., Greenberg L., Nilsson P.A., Nyström P., Romare P., Tranvik L. Effects of enrichment on simple aquatic food webs. Am. Nat. 2001, 157:654-669.
48. Peters R.H., Downing J.A. Empirical analysis of zooplankton filtering and feeding rates. Limnol. Oceanogr. 1984, 29:763-784.
49. Petrovskii S., Li B., Malchow H. Transition to spatiotemporal chaos can resolve the paradox of enrichment. Ecol. Complex. 2004, 1:37-47.
50. Press W.H., Teukolsky S.A., Vetterling W.T., Flannery B.P. Numerical Recipes in C 1992, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, Great Britain.
51. Reynolds C.S., Huszar V., Kruk C., Naselli-Flores L., Melo S. Towards a functional classification of the freshwater phytoplankton. J. Plankton Res. 2002, 24:417-428.
52. Richardson B., Orcutt D.M., Schwertner H.A., Martinez C.L., Wickline H.E. Effects of nitrogen limitation on the growth and composition of unicellular algae in continuous culture. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 1969, 18:245-250.
53. Rodríguez-López M., Villarroya M., Muñoz-Calvo M.L. Influence of ammonium and nitrate on protein content amino acid pattern. Storage materials and fine structure of Chlorella 8H recovering from N starvation. Algae Biomass 1980, 723-731. Elsevier, Amsterdam, Holland. G. Shelef, C.J. Soeder (Eds.).
54. Rosenzweig M.L., MacArthur R.H. Graphical representation and stability conditions of predator prey interactions. Am. Nat. 1963, 47:209-223.
55. Rosenzweig M.L. Paradox of enrichment: destabilization of exploitative ecosystem in ecological time. Science 1971, 171:385-387.
56. Rothhaup K.O. A model approach to the population dynamics of the rotifer Brachionus rubens in two stage chemostat culture. Oecologia 1985, 65:252-259.
57. Roy S., Chattopadhyay J. The stability of ecosystems: a brief overview of the paradox of enrichment. J. Biosci. 2007, 32:421-428.
58. Schenk D., Bersier L.F., Bacher S. An experimental test of the nature of predation neither prey nor ratio dependent. J. Anim. Ecol. 2005, 74:86-91.
59. Seitz A. Are there allelopathic interactions in zooplankton? Laboratory experiments with Daphnia. Oecologia 1984, 62:94-96.
60. Skalski G.T., Gilliam J.F. Functional responses with predator interference: viable alternatives to the Holling Type II model. Ecology 2001, 82:3083-3092.
61. Smith H.L., Walkman P. The Theory of the Chemostat 1995, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, Great Britain.
62. Sutherland W.J., Koene P.K. Field estimates of the strength of interference between oystercatchers Haematopus ostralegus. Oecologia 1982, 55:108-109.
63. Van der Stap I., Vos M., Mooij W.M. Inducible defenses and rotifer food chain dynamics. Hydrobiología 2007, 593:103-110.
64. Van der Stap I., Vos M., Tollrian R., Mooij W.M. Inducible defenses, competition and shared predation in planktonic food chains. Oecologia 2008, 157:697-705.
65. Vera A., Martínez M., Morillo K., Montes S. Cultivo discontinuo de Chlorella sp. en medios enriquecidos con el exudado gomoso de Acacia macracantha. Bol. Centro Inv. Biol. 2004, 38:1-10.
66. Vos M., Kooi B.W., DeAngelis D.L., Mooij W.M. Inducible defences and the paradox of enrichment. Oikos 2004, 105:471-480.
67. Walz N. Methods of single and two stage chemostat experiments. Plankton Regulation Dynamics 1993, 21-29. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Germany. N. Walz (Ed.).
68. Walz N. Characteristics of two stage chemostat cultures of Brachionus angularis. Plankton Regulation Dynamics 1993, 21-29. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Germany. N. Walz (Ed.).
69. Wood S.N., Thomas M.B. Super sensitivity to structure in biological models. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. 1999, 266:565-570.
70. Yoshida T., Jones L.E., Ellner S.P., Fussmann G.F., Hairston N.G. Rapid evolution drives ecological dynamics in a predator-prey system. Nature 2003, 424:303-306.