The effect of vascular access modality on changes in fluid content in the arms as determined by multifrequency bioimpedance

Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation

Volumn 26, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 227-231

  Booth, John ^a   Pinney, Jennifer ^a   Davenport, Andrew ^b  

^a ROYAL FREE HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

arterio venous fistula; extracellular fluid; haemodialysis; multifrequency bioimpedance

Indexed keywords

INSULIN;

ADULT; ANALYTICAL EQUIPMENT; ARTERIOVENOUS FISTULA; ARTICLE; BLOOD FLOW; CENTRAL VENOUS CATHETER; CLINICAL ARTICLE; DIABETES MELLITUS; DIABETIC PATIENT; DOPPLER FLOWMETRY; EXTRACELLULAR FLUID; FEMALE; FOREARM; HEMODIALYSIS; HEMODIALYSIS PATIENT; HUMAN; HYPOTENSION; IMPEDANCE; MACHINE; MALE; MEASUREMENT; MULTIFREQUENCY BIOIMPEDANCE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RACE DIFFERENCE; TOTAL BODY WATER; VASCULAR ACCESS;

ARM; ARTERIOVENOUS FISTULA; BODY WATER; ELECTRIC IMPEDANCE; FEMALE; HUMANS; HYPOTENSION; KIDNEY FAILURE, CHRONIC; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PROGNOSIS; RENAL DIALYSIS; WATER-ELECTROLYTE IMBALANCE;

EID: 78650663879     PISSN: 09310509     EISSN: 14602385     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/ndt/gfq331     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Davenport A. Intradialytic complications during haemodialysis. Hemodial Int 2006; 10: 162-167
2. Davenport A, Cox C, Thuraisingham R. Achieving blood pressure targets during dialysis improves control but increases intradialytic hypotension. Kidney Int 2008; 73: 759-764
3. Davenport A. Can advances in haemodialysis machine technology prevent intradialytic hypotension? Semin Dial 2009; 22: 231-236
4. Reddan DN, Szczech LA, Hasselbad V. Intradialytic blood volume monitoring in ambulatory haemodialysis patients> a randomised trial. J Am Soc Nephrol 2005; 16: 2162-2169
5. Zhu F, Leonard EF, Levin NW. Extracellular fluid redistribution during haemodialysis: bioimpedance measurement and model. Physiol Measure 2008; 29: S491-S501
6. Willicombe MK, Davenport A. Comparison of fluid status in patients treated by different modalities of peritoneal dialysis using multi-frequency bioimpedance. Int J Artif Organs 2009; 32: 779-786
7. Mitra S, Chamney P, Greenwood R et al. Linear decay of relative blood volume during ultrafiltration predicts hemodynamic instability. Am J Kidney Dis 2002; 40: 556-565
8. The National Service Framework for Renal Services Part 1: Dialysis and Transplantation. London, UK: Department of Health, January 2004. www.doh.gov/uk/nsf/renal/index.htm.
9. Tomson CRV TM. Clinical practice guidelines. Module 1. chronic kidney disease. www.renal.org/Clinical/GuidelinesSection/CKD. aspx#Summary-S3
10. Van der Kerkhof J, Hermans M, Beerenhout C et al. Reference values for multifrequency bioimpedance analysis in dialysis patients. Blood Purif 2004; 22: 301-306
11. Bedogni G, Malavolti M, Severi S et al. Accuracy of an eight-point tactile-electrode impedance method in the assessment of total body water. Eur J Clin Nutr 2002; 56: 1143-1148
12. Guyton AC, Sagawa K. Compensations of cardiac output and other circulatory functions in areflex dogs with large A-V fistulas. Am J Physiol 1961; 200: 1157-1163
13. Schneditz D, Kaufman AM, Levin N. Surveillance of access function by the blood temperature monitor. Semin Dial 2003; 16: 483-487 (Pubitemid 37550129)
14. Davenport A, Willicombe MK. Does diabetes mellitus predispose to increased fluid overload in peritoneal dialysis patients? Nephron Clin Pract 2009; 114: c60-c66
15. Bemelmans RH, Boerma EC, Barendregt J et al. Changes in the volume status of haemodialysis patients are reflected in sublingual microvascular perfusion. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2009; 24: 3487-3492
16. Davenport A, Willicombe MK. Hydration status does not influence peritoneal equilibration test ultrafiltration volumes. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 2009; 4: 1207-1212