Multi-level binary replacement (MBR) design for computer experiments in high-dimensional nonlinear systems

Journal of Chemometrics

Volumn 24, Issue 11-12, 2010, Pages 748-756

  Martens, Harald ^a   Måge, Ingrid ^b   Tøndel, Kristin ^a   Isaeva, Julia ^a   Høy, Martin ^b   Sæbø, Solve ^a  

^a NORWEGIAN UNIVERSITY OF LIFE SCIENCES   (Norway)

^b NOFIMA   (Norway)

Author keywords

Binary replacement; Combinatorial explosion; Computer experiment; Fractional factorial; Multi level design

Indexed keywords

CURVE FITTING; DESIGN; MULTIVARIANT ANALYSIS; NONLINEAR SYSTEMS;

BINARY REPLACEMENT; COMBINATORIAL EXPLOSION; COMPUTER EXPERIMENT; FACTORIAL DESIGN; FRACTIONAL FACTORIALS; HIGH-DIMENSIONAL; HIGHER-DIMENSIONAL; META MODEL; MULTI-LEVEL DESIGNS; MULTILEVELS;

CLUSTERING ALGORITHMS;

EID: 78650660943     PISSN: 08869383     EISSN: 1099128X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/cem.1366     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Kleijnen JP. Design and Analysis of Simulation Experiments, (1st edn). Springer: 2007.
2. Kohler A, Sulé-Suso J, Sockalingum GD, Tobin M, Bahrami F, Yang Y, Pijanka J, Dumas P, Cotte M, van Pittius DG, Parkes G, Martens H. Estimating and correcting Mie scattering in synchrotron-based microscopic FTIR spectra by extended multiplicative signal correction (EMSC). Appl. Spectrosc. 2008; 62(3): 259-266.
3. Bassan P, Kohler A, Martens H, Lee J, Byrne HJ, Dumas P, Gazi E, Brown M, Clarke N, Gardner P., Resonant Mie Scattering (RMieS) correction of infrared spectra from highly scattering biological samples. Analyst 2010; 135, 268-277.
4. Martens H. 2009; Nonlinear multivariate dynamics modelled by PLSR. In Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Partial Least Squares and Related Methods, Beijing, 4-7 September 2009, Vinzi VE, Tenenhaus M, Guan R, (eds). Publishing House of Electronics Industry: Beijing, China, 139-144. Available at.
5. Martens H, Veflingstad SR, Plahte E, Martens M, Bertrand D, Omholt SW. 2009; The genotype-phenotype relationship in multicellular pattern-generating models-the neglected role of pattern descriptors. BMC Syst. Biol. 3: 87. DOI: 10.1186/1752-0509-3-87
6. Fisher RA. The arrangement of field experiments. J. Minist. Agric. (G.B.) 1926; 33: 503-513.
7. Steinberg DM, Hunter WG. Experimental design: review and comment. Technometrics 1984; 26(2): 71-97.
8. Box GEP. The exploration and exploitation of response surfaces: Some general considerations and examples. Biometrics 1954; 10: 16-60.
9. Box G, Behnken D. Some new three level designs for the study of quantitative variables. Technometrics 1960; 2: 455-475.
10. Box GEP, Wilson KB. On the experimental attainment of optimum conditions. J. Royal Stat. Soc., Ser. B 1951; 13: 1-45.
11. Cornell JA. Experiments with Mixtures: DESIGNS, Models and the Analysis of Mixture Data. Wiley: New York, 1981.
12. Finney DJ. Fractional replication of factorial arrangements. Ann. Eugenics 1945; 12: 291-301.
13. Montgomery DC. Design and Analysis of Experiments, (6th edn). Wiley: New York, 2005.
14. Raymond H, Myers Douglas C. Montgomery: Response Surface Methodology. John Wiley and Sons: New York, 1995.
15. Simpson TW, Lin DKJ, Chen W. Sampling strategies for computer experiments: design and analysis. Int. J. Reliab. Appl. 2001; 2(3): 209-240.
16. Addelman S. Orthogonal main-effects plans for asymmetrical factorial experiments. Technometrics 1962; 4: 21-46.
17. Tøndel K, Gjuvsland AB, Måge I, Martens H. Screening design for computer experiments: metamodelling of a deterministic mathematical model of the mammalian circadian clock. J. Chemom. 2010; 23: 1-11.
18. Warringer J, Anevski D, Liu B, Blomberg A. Chemogenetic fingerprinting by analysis of cellular growth dynamics. MBC Chem. Biol. 8(3): 1-10.
19. Gottschalk PG, Dunn JR. The five-parameter logistic: A characterization and comparison with the four-parameter logistic. Anal. Biochem. 2005; 343(1): 54-65.
20. Cela R, Phan Tan Luu R, Claeys-Bruno M. Screening strategies. In: Brown TR, Walczak B, (eds). Comprehensive Chemometrics. Elsevier: Oxford, 2009; 251-300.