Screening design for computer experiments: Metamodelling of a deterministic mathematical model of the mammalian circadian clock

Journal of Chemometrics

Volumn 24, Issue 11-12, 2010, Pages 738-747

  Tøndel, Kristin ^a   Gjuvsland, Arne B ^a   Måge, Ingrid ^b   Martens, Harald ^a  

^a NORWEGIAN UNIVERSITY OF LIFE SCIENCES   (Norway)

^b NOFIMA   (Norway)

Author keywords

Computer experiment; Mammalian circadian clock model; Metamodelling; Parameter range finding; Reduced factorial design

Indexed keywords

CLOCKS; DESIGN OF EXPERIMENTS; MAMMALS; STATISTICS;

CIRCADIAN CLOCK; CLOCK MODEL; COMPUTER EXPERIMENT; FACTORIAL DESIGN; MAMMALIAN CIRCADIAN CLOCK MODEL; METAMODELING; MULTILEVELS; PARAMETER RANGE; PARAMETER RANGE FINDING; REDUCED FACTORIAL DESIGN;

COST EFFECTIVENESS;

EID: 78650634181     PISSN: 08869383     EISSN: 1099128X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/cem.1363     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Kleijnen JP. Design and Analysis of Simulation Experiments, (1st edn). Springer: New York, USA, 2007.
2. Montgomery DC, Myers RH. Response Surface Methodology: Process and Product Optimization Using Designed Experiments, (1st edn). John Wiley & Sons: New York, USA, 1995.
3. Santner TJ, Williams BJ, Notz W. The Design and Analysis of Computer Experiments. Springer: New York, USA, 2003.
4. Cacuci DG, Ionescu-Bujor M, Navon IM. Sensitivity and Uncertainty Analysis: Applications to Large-scale Systems, Vol 2 (1st edn). CRC Press: Boca Raton, USA, 2005.
5. Martens H, Måge I, Tøndel K, Isaeva J, Høy M, Sæbø S. Multi-level binary replacement (MBR) design for computer experiments in high-dimensional nonlinear systems. J. Chemometr. 2010; 23: XX-XX.
6. Addelman S. Orthogonal main-effect plans for asymmetrical factorial experiments. Technometrics 1962; 4: 21-46.
7. Leloup J, Goldbeter A. Modeling the mammalian circadian clock: sensitivity analysis and multiplicity of oscillatory mechanisms. J. Theor. Biol. 2004; 230: 541-562.
8. Wold S, Ruhe A, Wold H, Dunn WJ., The collinearity problem in linear regression. The partial least squares (PLS) approach to generalised inverses. SIAM J. Sci. and Stat. Comput. 1984; 5: 735-743.
9. Wold S, Martens H, Wold H. Lecture notes in Mathematics, Matrix Pencils. Springer-Verlag: Heidelberg, 1983; 286-293.
10. Martens H, Martens M. Multivariate Analysis of Quality: An Introduction, (1st edn). Wiley: 2001.
11. Martens H, Naes T. Multivariate Calibration. John Wiley and Sons: Chichester, UK, 1989.
12. Lloyd CM, Lawson JR, Hunter PJ, Nielsen PF. The CellML model repository. Bioinformatics 2008; 24: 2122-2123.
13. Gelsema ES, Kanal LN. Pattern recognition in practice. In 2nd International Workshop Proceedings Elsevier Science Ltd, 1985.
14. Kalos MH, Whitlock PA. Monte Carlo Methods Volume 1: Basics, (1st edn). John Wiley & Sons, Inc.: New York, USA, 1986.
15. Liu JS. Monte Carlo Strategies in Scientific Computing. Springer: New York, USA, 2008.
16. Hindmarsh AC, Brown PN, Grant KE, Lee SL, Serban R, Shumaker DE, Woodward CS. SUNDIALS: suite of nonlinear and differential/algebraic equation solvers. ACM Trans. Math. Softw. 2005; 31: 363-396.
17. MATLAB®, The MathWorks™, 2009.
18. Box GEP, Behnken DW. Some new three level designs for the study of quantitative variables. Technometrics 1960; 2: 455-475.
19. Simpson T, Lin D, Chen W. Sampling strategies for computer experiments: design and analysis. Int. J. Reliab. Saf. (IJRS) 2001; 2: 209-240.
20. Kennard RW, Stone LA. Computer aided design of experiments. Technometrics 1969; 11: 137-148.
21. Marengo E, Todeschini R. A new algorithm for optimal, distance-based experimental design. Chemometr. Intell. Lab. 1992; 16: 37-44.
22. Fang K, Lin DK. Uniform experimental design and its applications in industry. In Handbook of Statistics in Industry, C.R. Rao, R. Khattree (ed.). 2003; 22: 131-170.