Online lecture delivery paired with in class problem-based learning ... Does it enhance student learning?

Currents in Pharmacy Teaching and Learning

Volumn 3, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 23-29

  Lancaster, Jason W ^a   McQueeney, Maureen L ^a   Van Amburgh, Jenny A ^a  

^a NORTHEASTERN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Active learning; Blended; Hybrid; Online; Problem based

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; HUMAN; LEARNING; MEDICAL STUDENT; ONLINE SYSTEM; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SCORING SYSTEM; STUDENT ATTITUDE; TEACHING;

EID: 78650622849     PISSN: 18771297     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.cptl.2010.10.008     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Middendorf J., Kalish A. The 'Change-Up' in lectures. The National Teaching and Learning Forum 1996, 5:1-4.
2. Palloff R.M., Pratt K. Building learning communities in cyberspace: effective strategies for the online classroom 1999, Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, CA.
3. Novak G.M., Patterson E.T., Gavrin A.D. Just-in-time teaching: blending active learning with web technology 1999, Prentice Hall, New York City.
4. Crouch M.A. An advanced cardiovascular pharmacotherapy course blending online and face-to-face instruction. Am J Pharm Educ 2009, 73. Article 51.
5. Elliott R.A., McDowell J., Marriott J.L., et al. A pharmacy preregistration course using online teaching and learning methods. Am J Pharm Educ 2009, 73. Article 77.
6. Pilarski P.P., Johnstone D.A., Pettepher C.C., et al. From music to macromolecules: using rich media/podcast lecture recordings to enhance the preclinical educational experience. Med Teach 2008, 30:630-632.
7. Pittenger A.L., Janke K.K., Bumgardner M.A. An online elective course for undergraduate students on common prescription medications. Am J Pharm Educ 2009, 73. Article 69.
8. Zapantis A., Machado C., Nemire R., et al. An elective course in adult acute care medicine using a hybrid delivery system. Am J Pharm Educ 2008, 72. Article 105.
9. Congdon H.B., Nutter D.A., Charneski L., et al. Impact of hybrid delivery of education on student academic performance and the student experience. Am J Pharm Educ 2009, 73. Article 121.
10. Alsharif N.Z., Henriksen B. Electronic integration of prerequisite course content. Am J Pharm Educ 2009, 73. Article 150.
11. Hake R.R. Interactive-engagement vs. traditional methods. Am J Phys 1998, 66:64-74.
12. Birk J.P., Foster J. The importance of lecture in general chemistry course performance. J Chem Ed 1993, 70:180-182.
13. Howe C., Strauss W. Millennials rising: the next great generation 2000, Vintage Books, New York.
14. Davis D.A. Millennial teaching. Academe 2003, 89:19-22.
15. Bloom B.S. Taxonomy of educational objectives, vol 1: Cognitive domain 1956, McKay, New York.