Digital mapping of A-horizon thickness using the correlation between various soil properties and soil apparent electrical resistivity

Geoderma

Volumn 157, Issue 3-4, 2010, Pages 154-164

  Chaplot, Vincent ^a   Lorentz, Simon ^a   Podwojewski, Pascal ^a   Jewitt, Graham ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF KWAZULU NATAL   (South Africa)

Author keywords

Apparent resistivity; Digital mapping; Erosion; Multivariate analysis; Soil

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER GRAPHICS; ELECTRIC CONDUCTIVITY; EROSION; MAPPING; MULTIVARIANT ANALYSIS; PRINCIPAL COMPONENT ANALYSIS; SOIL MOISTURE; SOIL SURVEYS; SOILS;

APPARENT RESISTIVITY; DIGITAL MAPPING; GEOPHYSICAL TECHNIQUES; LIMITED INFORMATION; MULTI VARIATE ANALYSIS; REGRESSION-KRIGING; SOIL ELECTRICAL RESISTIVITIES; SPATIAL VARIATIONS;

SOIL TESTING;

ACCURACY ASSESSMENT; DIGITAL MAP; ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY; ESTIMATION METHOD; GEOPHYSICS; GPS; LANDSCAPE; MEASUREMENT METHOD; PHYSICOCHEMICAL PROPERTY; PRINCIPAL COMPONENT ANALYSIS; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; SENSOR; SOIL EROSION; SOIL HORIZON; SOIL NUTRIENT; SOIL PROPERTY; SPATIAL VARIATION; TOPSOIL;

EID: 78650602551     PISSN: 00167061     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.geoderma.2010.04.006     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Archie, G.E., 1942. The electrical resistivity log as an aid in determining some reservoir characteristics. Trans. Am. Inst. Min. Metall. Pet. Eng. 146, 54-62.
2. Burgess, T., Webster, R., McBratney, A., 1981. Optimal interpolation and isarithmic mapping of soil properties. IV. Sampling strategy. J. Soil Sci. 32, 643-659.
3. Chaplot, V., Walter, C., Curmi, P., Hollier-Larousse, A., 2001. Mapping eld-scale hydromorphic horizons using Radio-MT electrical resistivity. Geoderma 102, 61-74.
4. Chaplot, V., Darboux, F., Bourennane, H., Leguédois, S., Silvera, N., Phachomphon, K., 2006. On the accuracy of interpolation techniques in digital elevation models for various landscape morphologies, surface areas and sampling densities. Geomorphology 77, 126-141.
5. Chessel, D., Dufour, A.B., Thioulouse, J., 2004. The ADE4 package. One-table methods. R News 4, 5-10.
6. Corwin, D.L., Lesch, S.M., 2003. Application of soil electrical conductivity to precision agriculture: theory, principles, and guidelines. Agron. J. 95, 455-471.
7. Cousin, I., Besson, A., Aboubacar Sani, A., Accart, V., Samouëlian, A., Cornu, S., Richard, G., 2005. Inuence of soil water content, soil bulk density, soil solution composition on electrical resistivity measurements. Geophys. Res. Abstr. 7, 08150.
8. Dolittle, J., Ealy, E., Secrist, G., Rector, D., Crouch, M., 1995. Reconnaissance soil mapping of a small watershed using electromagnetic induction and global positioning system techniques. Surv. Horiz. 36, 86-94.
9. Eigenberg, R.A., Korthals, R.L., Neinaber, J.A., 1998. Geophysical electromagnetic survey methods applied to agricultural waste sites. J. Environ. Qual. 27, 215-219.
10. ESRI, 2004. The ArcMap9.1 system. ESRI, 380 New York Street, Redlands, CA, USA, 92273.
11. Gamma Design Software, 2007. Geostatistics for the Environmental Sciences, GS+ 7.0. Gamma Design Software, LLC, P.O. Box 201, Plainwell, Michigan 49080 USA.
12. Goovaerts, P., 1997. Geostatistics for natural resources evaluation. Oxford University Press, New York0-19-511538-4. 483 pp.
13. International Geosphere-Biosphere Programme (IGBP), 2008. Land-use and land cover change. Science Research Plan, Stockholm, p. 123.
14. Johnson, C.K., Doran, J.W., Duke, H.R., Wienhold, B.J., Eskridge, K.M., Shanahan, J.F., 2001. Field-scale electrical conductivity mapping for delineating soil condition. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 65, 1829-1837.
15. Kachanoski, R.G., Gregorich, E.G., Van Wesenbeeck, J., 1988. Estimating spatial variations of soil water content using noncontacting electromagnetic inductive methods. Can. J. Soil Sci. 68, 715-722.
16. Kalinski, R.J., Kelly, W.E., 1993. Estimating water content of soils from electrical resistivity. Geotech. Test. J. 16, 323-329.
17. Mallants, D., Vanclooster, M., Toride, N., Vanderborght, J., Van Genuchten, M.Th., Feyen, J., 1996. Comparison of three methods to calibrate TDR for monitoring solute movement in undisturbed soil. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 60, 747-754.
18. Matheron, G., 1965. Les variables régionalisées et leur estimation: une application de la théorie de fonctions aléatoires aux sciences de la nature. Masson et Cie, Paris. 306 pp.
19. McCarter, W.J., 1984. The electrical resistivity characteristics of compacted clays. Geotechnique 34, 263-267.
20. Michot, D., Benderitter, Y., Dorigny, A., Nicoullaud, B., King, D., Tabbagh, A., 2003. Spatial and temporal monitoring of soil water content with an irrigated corn crop cover using electrical resistivity tomography. Water Resour. Res. 39, 11-38.
21. Myers, D.E., 1994. Spatial interpolation: an overview. Geoderma 62, 17-28.
22. Oldeman, L.R., 1994. The global extent of land degradation. In: Greenland, D.J., Szabolcs, I. (Eds.), Land Resilience and Sustainable Land Use. CABI, Wallingford, pp. 99-118.
23. Rhoades, J.D., Corwin, D.L., 1981. Determining soil electrical conductivity-depth relations using inductive electromagnetic soil conductivity meter. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 45, 255-260.
24. Rhoades, J.D., Corwin, D.L., 1990. Effects of soil properties and application to soil salinity appraisal. Soil Sci. Plant Anal. 21, 837-860.
25. Rhoades, J.D., van Schilfgaarde, J., 1976. An electrical conductivity probe for determining soil salinity. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 40, 647-651.
26. Rhoades, J.D., Manteghi, N.A., Shouse, P.J., Alves, W.J., 1989. Soil electrical conductivity and soil salinity: new formulations and calibrations. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 53, 433-439.
27. Robain, H., Descloitres, M., Ritz, M., Atangana, Q.Y., 1996. A multiscale electrical survey of a lateritic soil system in the rain forest of Cameroon. J. Appl. Geophys. 34, 237-253.
28. Samouëlian, A., Cousin, I., Tabbagh, A., Bruand, A., Richard, G., 2005. Electrical resistivity survey in soil science: a review. Soil Tillage Res. 83, 173-193.
29. Schulze, R.E., 1997. South African atlas of agrohydrology and climatology. TT82/96 Water Research Commission, Pretoria, RSA.
30. Sirjacobs, D., Hanquet, B., Lebeau, F., Destain, M.F., 2002. On-line soil mechanical resistance mapping and correlation with soil physical properties for precision agriculture. Soil Tillage Res. 64, 231-242.
31. Sudduth, K.A., Kitchen, N.R., Bollerob, G.A., Bullock, D.G., Wiebold, W.J., 2003. Comparison of electromagnetic induction and direct sensing of soil electrical conductivity. Agron. J. 95, 472-482.
32. Thompson, J.A., Bell, J.C., 1996. Color index for identifying hydric conditions for seasonally saturated mollisols in Minnesota. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 60, 1979-1988.
33. UNEP, 1994. Environmental Data Report 1993-94. United Nations Environmental Programme, Oxford.
34. Vaughan, P.J., Lesch, S.M., Corwin, D.L., Cone, D.G., 1995. Water content effect on soil salinity prediction: a geostatistical study using co-kriging. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 59, 1146-1156.
35. W.R.B., 1998. World Reference Base for soil resources. World soil resources reports, n°84. FAO, Rome. 88 pp.
36. Williams, B.G., Hoey, D., 1987. The use of electromagnetic induction to detect the spatial variability in the salt and clay content of soils. Austr. J. Soil Res. 25, 21-27.