Use of the UKPDS Outcomes Model to predict all-cause mortality in U.S. adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus: Comparison of predicted versus observed mortality

Diabetes Research and Clinical Practice

Volumn 91, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 121-126

  Song, May ^a   Alexander, Charles M ^b   Mavros, Panagiotis ^b   Lopez, Victor A ^a   Malik, Shaista ^a   Phatak, Hemant M ^b   Wong, Nathan D ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b MERCK RESEARCH LABORATORIES   (United States)

Author keywords

Diabetes; Mortality; UKPDS

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGE; ARTICLE; CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASE; COMORBIDITY; CONTROLLED STUDY; DISEASE DURATION; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HEALTH SURVEY; HUMAN; LIFE EXPECTANCY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MORTALITY; NON INSULIN DEPENDENT DIABETES MELLITUS; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PREDICTION; PROBABILITY; UNITED KINGDOM; UNITED STATES;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASES; COHORT STUDIES; COMPUTER SIMULATION; DIABETES COMPLICATIONS; DIABETES MELLITUS, TYPE 2; GREAT BRITAIN; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MODELS, STATISTICAL; MORTALITY; NUTRITION SURVEYS; TREATMENT OUTCOME; UNITED STATES; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 78650584381     PISSN: 01688227     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.diabres.2010.10.011     Document Type: Article

References (13)

1. Stevens R.J., Kothari V., Adler A.I., Stratton I.M. The UKPDS risk engine: a model for the risk of coronary heart disease in Type II diabetes (UKPDS 56). Clin Sci (Lond) 2001, 101(December (6)):671-679. United Kingdom Prospective Diabetes Study (UKPDS) Group.
2. Clarke P.M., Gray A.M., Briggs A., Farmer A.J., Fenn P., Stevens R.J., et al. A model to estimate the lifetime health outcomes of patients with Type 2 diabetes: the United Kingdom Prospective Diabetes Study (UKPDS) Outcomes Model (UKPDS no 68). Diabetologia 2004, 47(10):1747-1759.
3. UK prospective diabetes study VIII: study design, progress and performance. Diabetologia 1991, 34:877-890. UKPDS Group.
4. UKPDS Outcomes Model. University of Oxford Diabetes Trials Unit and Health Economics Research Centre. Version 1.2. (released: June 20th, 2007).
5. Holmann R.R., Paul S.K., Bethel A., Matthews D.R., Neil H.A.W. 10-year follow-up of intensive glucose control in Type 2 diabetes. N Engl J Med 2008, 359:1577-1589.
6. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). National Center for Health Statistics (NCHS). Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey Data. Hyattsville, MD: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, [1988-1994].
7. Plan and Operation of the Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 1988-1994. Hyattsville, MD, National Center for Health Statistics, 1994 (Vital and Health Statistics Series 1, no. 32).
8. National Center for Health Statistics. The Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 1988-1994. Public-use data file and documentation. http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/about/major/nhanes/nh3data.htm.
9. National Center for Health Statistics. Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey Linked Mortality Data File. Public-use data file and documentation. ftp://ftp.cdc.gov/pub/Health_Statistics/NCHS/datalinkage/linked_mortality/nhanes3_mort_public_use.dat.
10. National Center for Health Statistics (NCHS). Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Linked Mortality File: Matching Methodology [2005]. http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/datalinkage/matching_methodology_nhanes3_final.pdf.
11. SAS Procedures Guide, version 6.12. 3rd ed. Cary, NC: SAS Institute; 1995.
12. Implications of the United Kingdom Prospective Diabetes Study. Diabetes Care 2002, 25(Suppl 1):28-32. American Diabetes Association.
13. Stratton I.M., Adler A.I., Neil H.A., Matthews D.R., Manley S.E., Cull C.A., et al. Association of glycaemia with macrovascular and microvascular complications of type 2 diabetes (UKPDS 35): prospective observational study. BMJ. 2000, 321(August (7258)):405-412.