Plutof-a web based workbench for ecological and taxonomic research, with an online implementation for fungal its sequences

Evolutionary Bioinformatics

Volumn 2010, Issue 6, 2010, Pages 189-196

  Abarenkov, Kessy ^a,b   Tedersoo, Leho ^a,b   Nilsson, R Henrik ^b,c   Vellak, Kai ^b   Saar, Irja ^b   Veldre, Vilmar ^b   Parmasto, Erast ^a,d   Prous, Marko ^b   Aan, Anne ^a   Ots, Margus ^a   Kurina, Olavi ^d   Ostonen, Ivika ^b   Jõgeva, Janno ^a   Halapuu, Siim ^a   Põldmaa, Kadri ^b   Toots, Märt ^b,e   Truu, Jaak ^e   Larsson, Karl Henrik ^f   Kõljalg, Urmas ^a,b  

^a University of Tartu Natural History Museum   (Estonia)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TARTU   (Estonia)

^c UNIVERSITY OF GOTHENBURG   (Sweden)

^d ESTONIAN UNIVERSITY OF LIFE SCIENCES   (Estonia)

^e UNIVERSITY OF TARTU   (Estonia)

^f UNIVERSITY OF OSLO   (Norway)

Author keywords

Data mining; Metadata; Sequence identification; Sequence management environment; Thin clients

Indexed keywords

INTERNAL TRANSCRIBED SPACER;

ACCESS TO INFORMATION; ARTICLE; BIOINFORMATICS; COMPUTER PROGRAM; DATA MINING; DNA SEQUENCE; FUNGAL GENETICS; GENETIC MARKER; INFORMATION PROCESSING; INFORMATION RETRIEVAL; INTERNET; ONLINE SYSTEM; SEQUENCE ANALYSIS; SEQUENCE DATABASE; TAXONOMY; WEB BROWSER;

FUNGI;

EID: 78650578953     PISSN: None     EISSN: 11769343     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.4137/EBO.S6271     Document Type: Article

References (50)

1. Tautz D, Arctander P, Minelli A, Thomas RH, Vogler AP. A plea for DNA taxonomy. Trends Ecol Evol. 2003;18:70-4.
2. Peay KG, Kennedy PG, Bruns TD. Fungal community ecology: a hybrid beast with a molecular master. BioScience. 2008;58:799-810.
3. Stajich JE, Berbee ML, Blackwell M, et al. The fungi. Curr Biol. 2009;19:840-5.
4. Benson DA, Karsch-Mizrachi I, Lipman DJ, Ostell J, Sayers EW. GenBank. Nucl Acids Res. 2009;37:D26-31.
5. Lozupone CA, Knight R. Global patterns in bacterial diversity. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007;104:11436-40.
6. Ryberg M, Nilsson RH, Kristiansson E, Topel M, Jacobsson S, Larsson E. Mining metadata from unidentified ITS sequences in GenBank: a case study in Inocybe (Basidiomycota). BMC Evol Biol. 2008;8:50.
7. Nilsson RH, Ryberg M, Sjökvist E, Abarenkov K. Rethinking taxon sampling in the light of environmental sequencing. Cladistics. 2010;doi:10.1111/j. 1096-0031.2010.00336.x (in press).
8. Oren A. Prokaryote diversity and taxonomy: current status and future challenges. Phil Trans R Soc Lond B. 2004;359:623-38.
9. Konstantinidis K, Tiedje JM. Prokaryotic taxonomy and phylogeny in the genomic era: advancements and challenges ahead. Curr Opin Microbiol. 2007;10:504-9.
10. Verslyppe B, Kottman R, de Smet W, de Baets B, de Vos P, Dawyndt P. Microbiological Common Language (MCL): a standard for electronic information exchange in the Microbial Commons. Res Microbiol. 2010; 161:439-45.
11. Nielsen DL, Shiel RJ, Smith FJ. Ecology versus taxonomy: is there a middle ground? Hydrobiologia. 1998;387-388:451-7.
12. Christen R. Global sequencing: a review of current molecular data and new methods available to assess microbial diversity. Microb Environ. 2008;23:253-68.
13. Ryberg M, Kristiansson E, Sjökvist E, Nilsson RH. An outlook on the fungal internal transcribed spacer sequences in GenBank and the introduction of a web-based tool for the exploration of fungal diversity. New Phytol. 2009;181:471-7.
14. Nilsson RH, Veldre V, Wang Z, et al. A note on the incidence of reverse complementary fungal ITS sequences in the public sequence databases and a software means for their detection and reorientation. Mycoscience. 2010 (in press).
15. Pennisi E. Proposal to 'Wikify' GenBank meets stiff resistance. Science. 2008;319:1598-9.
16. Gilks WR, Audit B, de Angelis D, Tsoka S, Ouzounis CA. Modeling the percolation of annotation errors in a database of protein sequences. Bioinformatics. 2002;18:1641-9.
17. Bidartondo MI. ADD 2 CO_AUTHORS. Preserving accuracy in GenBank. Science. 2008;319:1616.
18. Nilsson RH, Abarenkov K, Veldre V, et al. An open source chimera checker for the fungal ITS region. Mol Ecol Res. 2010;10:1076-81.
19. Abarenkov K, Nilsson RH, Larsson K-H, et al. The UNITE database for molecular identification of fungi-recent updates and future perspectives. New Phytol. 2010;186:281-5.
20. Begerow D, Nilsson RH, Unterseher M, Maier W. Current state and perspectives of fungal DNA barcoding and rapid identification procedures. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2010;87:99-108.
21. Eberhardt U. A constructive step towards selecting a DNA barcode for fungi. New Phytol. 2010;187:265-8.
22. Pruesse E, Quast C, Knittel K, et al. SILVA: a comprehensive online resource for quality checked and aligned ribosomal RNA sequence data compatible with ARB. Nucl Acids Res. 2007;35:7188-96.
23. DeSantis TZ, Hugenholtz P, Larsen N, et al. Greengenes, a chimera-checked 16S rRNA gene database and workbench compatible with ARB. App Environ Microbiol. 2006;72:5069-72.
24. Kõljalg U, Larsson K-H, Abarenkov K, et al. UNITE: a database providing web-based methods for the molecular identification of ectomycorrhizal fungi. New Phytol. 2005;166:1063-8.
25. Dethlefsen L, Huse S, Sogin ML, Relman DA. The pervasive effects of an antibiotic on the human gut microbiota, as revealed by deep 16S rRNA sequencing. PLoS Biol. 2008;6:e280.
26. Bueé M, Reich M, Murat C, et al. 454 Pyrosequencing analyses of forest soils reveal an unexpectedly high fungal diversity. New Phytol. 2009;184:449-56.
27. Öpik M, Vanatoa A, Vanatoa E, et al. The online database MaarjAM reveals global and ecosystemic distribution patterns in arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (Glomeromycota). New Phytol. 2010;188:223-41.
28. Schloss PD, Westcott SL, Ryabin T, et al. Introducing mothur: open-source, platform-independent, community-supported software for describing and comparing microbial communities. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2009;75:7537-41.
29. Huber T, Faulkner G, Hugenholtz P. Bellerophon; a program to detect chimeric sequences in multiple sequence alignments. Bioinformatics. 2004;20:2317-9.
30. Arnold AE, Lamit LJ, Gehring CA, Bidartondo MI, Callahan H. Interwoven branches of the plant and fungal trees of life. New Phytol. 2010;185:874-8.
31. Pyle RL. Taxonomer: a relational data model for managing information relevant to taxonomic research. Phyloinformatics. 2003;1:1-54.
32. Hibbett DS, Binder M, Bischoff JF, et al. A higher-level phylogenetic classification of the Fungi. Mycol Res. 2007;111:509-47.
33. De Ley P, Blaxter M. A new system for Nematoda: combining morphological characters with molecular trees, and translating clades into ranks and taxa. Nemat Monogr Persp. 2004;2:633-53.
34. Sørensen MV, Giribet G. A modern approach to rotiferan phylogeny: combining morphological and molecular data. Mol Phyl Evol. 2006;40:585-608.
35. Angiosperm Phylogeny Group III. An update of the Angiosperm Phylogeny Group classifi{ligature}cation for the orders and families of fl{ligature}owering plants: APG III. Bot J Linn Soc. 2009;161:105-21.
36. Margulies M, Egholm M, Altman WE, et al. Genome sequencing in microfabricated high-density picolitre reactors. Nature. 2005;437:376-80.
37. Huse SM, Huber JA, Morrison HG, Sogin ML, Welch DM. Accuracy and quality of massively parallel DNA pyrosequencing. Genome Biol. 2007;8:R143.
38. Shendure J, Ji H. Next-generation DNA sequencing. Nature Biotechnol. 2008;26:1135-45.
39. Quince C, Lanzen A, Curtis TP, et al. Accurate determination of microbial diversity from 454 pyrosequencing data. Nature Meth. 2009;6:639-41.
40. Huse SM, Welch DM, Morrison HG, Sogin ML. Ironing out the wrinkles in the rare biosphere through improved OTU clustering. Environ Microbiol. 2010;12:1889-98.
41. Reeder J, Knight R. Rapidly denoising pyrosequencing amplicon reads by exploiting rank-abundance distributions. Nature Meth. 2010;7:668-9.
42. IUSS Working Group WRB. World reference base for soil resources 2006. 2nd edition. World Soil Resources Reports No. 103. 2006; FAO, Rome.
43. Tedersoo L, May TW, Smith ME. Ectomycorrhizal lifestyle in fungi: global diversity, distribution, and evolution of phylogenetic lineages. Mycorrhiza. 2010;20:217-63.
44. Altschul SF, Madden TL, Schäffer AA, et al. Gapped BLAST and PSI BLAST: a new generation in protein database search programs. Nucl Acids Res. 1997;25:3389-402.
45. Nilsson RH, Kristiansson E, Ryberg M, Larsson K-H. Approaching the taxonomic affiliation of unidentified sequences in public databases -an example from the mycorrhizal fungi. BMC Bioinform. 2005;6:178.
46. Nilsson RH, Veldre V, Hartmann M, et al. An open source software package for automated extraction of ITS1 and ITS2 from fungal ITS sequences for use in high-throughput community assays and molecular ecology. Fung Ecol. 2010;3:284-7.
47. Hartmann M, Howes CG, Abarenkov K, Mohn WW, Nilsson RH. V-Xtractor: An open-source, high-throughput software tool to identify and extract hypervariable regions of small subunit (16S/18S) ribosomal RNA gene sequences. J Microbiol Meth. 2010;83:250-3.
48. Nilsson RH, Kristiansson E, Ryberg M, Hallenberg N, Larsson K-H. Intraspecific ITS variability in the kingdom Fungi as expressed in the international sequence databases and its implications for molecular species identification. Evol Bioinf. 2008;4:193-201.
49. Tedersoo L, Nilsson RH, Abarenkov K, et al. 454 Pyrosequencing and Sanger sequencing of tropical mycorrhizal fungi provide similar results but reveal substantial methodological biases. New Phytol. 2010;188:291-301.
50. Caporaso JG, Kuczynski J, Stombaugh J, et al. QIIME allows analysis of high-throughput community sequence data. Nature Methods. 2010;7:335-6.