Multidirectional flexibility of the spine following posterior decompressive surgery after single-level cervical disc arthroplasty: An in vitro biomechanical investigation

Spine

Volumn 35, Issue 25, 2010, Pages

  Kikkawa, Jun ^a   Cunningham, Bryan W ^a   Shirado, Osamu ^b   Hu, Nianbin ^a   McAfee, Paul C ^a   Oda, Hiromi ^b  

^a St Joseph Medical Center   (United States)

^b SAITAMA MEDICAL UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

Author keywords

cervical spine; disc arthroplasty; laminectomy; laminoplasty; multidirectional flexibility

Indexed keywords

HYDROXYAPATITE;

ARTHROPLASTY; ARTICLE; BIOMECHANICS; DECOMPRESSION SURGERY; HUMAN; INTERVERTEBRAL DISKECTOMY; LAMINECTOMY; LAMINOPLASTY; MYELORADICULOPATHY; ORTHOPEDIC PROSTHESIS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RANGE OF MOTION;

ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT; BIOMECHANICS; CERVICAL VERTEBRAE; DECOMPRESSION, SURGICAL; DISKECTOMY; HUMANS; INTERVERTEBRAL DISK; RANGE OF MOTION, ARTICULAR; SPINE;

EID: 78650574946     PISSN: 03622436     EISSN: 15281159     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181f06ca8     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. DiAngelo DJ, Foley KT, Morrow BR, et al. In vitro biomechanics of cervical disc arthroplasty with the ProDisc-C total disc implant. Neurosurg Focus 2004;17:E7.
2. Puttlitz CM, Rousseau MA, Xu Z, et al. Intervertebral disc replacement maintains cervical spine kinetics. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2004;29:2809-14.
3. Dmitriev AE, Cunningham BW, Hu N, et al. Adjacent level intradiscal pressure and segmental kinematics following a cervical total disc arthroplasty: an in vitro human cadaveric model. Spine 2005;30:1165-72.
4. Goffin J, Van Calenbergh F, van Loon J, et al. Intermediate follow-up after treatment of degenerative disc disease with the Bryan Cervical Disc Prosthesis: single-level and bi-level. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2003;28:2673-8.
5. Wenger M, Hoonacker P, Zachee B, et al. Bryan cervical disc prostheses: preservation of function over time. J Clin Neurosci 2009;16:220-5.
6. Baba H, Furusawa N, Imura S, et al. Late radiographic findings after anterior cervical fusion for spondylotic myeloradiculopathy. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1993;18:2167-73.
7. Hilibrand AS, Carlson GD, Palumbo MA, et al. Radiculopathy and myelopathy at segments adjacent to the site of a previous anterior cervical arthrodesis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1999;81:519-28.
8. Iseda T, Goya T, Nakano S, et al. Serial changes in signal intensities of the adjacent discs on T2-weighted sagittal images after surgical treatment of cervical spondylosis: anterior interbody fusion versus expansive laminoplasty. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 2001;143:707-10.
9. Ishihara H, Kanamori M, Kawaguchi Y, et al. Adjacent segment disease after anterior cervical interbody fusion. Spine J 2004;4:624-8.
10. Goffin J, Geusens E, Vantomme N, et al. Long-term follow-up after interbody fusion of the cervical spine. J Spinal Disord Tech 2004;17:79-85.
11. Uribe J, Moza K, Jimenez O, et al. Delayed postoperative spinal epidural hematomas. Spine J 2003;3:125-9.
12. Wang MY, Green BA. Laminoplasty for the treatment of failed anterior cervical spine surgery. Neurosurg Focus 2003;15:E7.
13. Yue WM, Brodner W, Highland TR. Long-term results after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion with allograft and plating: a 5- to 11-year radiologic and clinical follow-up study. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2005;30:2138-44.
14. Netterville JL, Koriwchak MJ, Winkle M, et al. Vocal fold paralysis following the anterior approach to the cervical spine. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1996;105:85-91.
15. Burke JP, Gerszten PC, Welch WC. Iatrogenic vertebral artery injury during anterior cervical spine surgery. Spine J 2005;5:508-14; discussion 514.
16. Fountas KN, Kapsalaki EZ, Nikolakakos LG, et al. Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion associated complications. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2007;32: 2310-7.
17. Patel NP, Wolcott WP, Johnson JP, et al. Esophageal injury associated with anterior cervical spine surgery. Surg Neurol 2008;69:20-4; discission 24.
18. Coric D, Branch CL Jr, Jenkins JD. Revision of anterior cervical pseudoarthrosis with anterior allograft fusion and plating. J Neurosurg 1997; 86:969-74.
19. Eichholz KM, Ryken TC. Complications of revision spinal surgery. Neurosurg Focus 2003;15:E1.
20. Kurokawa T, Tsuyama N, Tanaka H. Enlargement of spinal canal by the sagittal splitting of the spinous process. Bessatsu Seikeigeka 1982;2:234-40.
21. Panjabi MM. Biomechanical evaluation of spinal fixation devices: I. A conceptual framework. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1988;13:1129-34.
22. Baba H, Furusawa N, Imura S, et al. Laminoplasty following anterior cervical fusion for spondylotic myeloradiculopathy. Int Orthop 1994;18:1-5.
23. Matsumoto M, Nojiri K, Chiba K, et al. Open-door laminoplasty for cervical myelopathy resulting from adjacent-segment disease in patients with previous anterior cervical decompression and fusion. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2006; 31:1332-7.
24. DiAngelo DJ, Roberston JT, Metcalf NH, et al. Biomechanical testing of an artificial cervical joint and an anterior cervical plate. J Spinal Disord Tech 2003;16:314-23.
25. Nowinski GP, Visarius H, Nolte LP, et al. A biomechanical comparison of cervical laminaplasty and cervical laminectomy with progressive facetectomy. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1993;18:1995-2004.
26. Kubo S, Goel VK, Yang SJ, et al. Biomechanical evaluation of cervical double- door laminoplasty using hydroxyapatite spacer. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2003;28:227-34.
27. Nakano K, Harata S, Suetsuna F, et al. Spinous process-splitting laminoplasty using hydroxyapatite spinous process spacer. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1992;17:S41-3.
28. Puttlitz CM, Deviren V, Smith JA, et al. Biomechanics of cervical laminoplasty: kinetic studies comparing different surgical techniques, temporal effects and the degree of level involvement. Eur Spine J 2004;13:213-21.
29. Abumi K, Panjabi MM, Kramer KM, et al. Biomechanical evaluation of lumbar spinal stability after graded facetectomies. Spine 1990;15:1142-7.
30. Baba H, Maezawa Y, Furusawa N, et al. Flexibility and alignment of the cervical spine after laminoplasty for spondylotic myelopathy. A radiographic study. Int Orthop 1995;19:116-21.
31. Kimura I, Shingu H, Nasu Y. Long-term follow-up of cervical spondylotic myelopathy treated by canal-expansive laminoplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1995;77:956-61.
32. Wada E, Suzuki S, Kanazawa A, et al. Subtotal corpectomy versus laminoplasty for multilevel cervical spondylotic myelopathy: a long-term follow- up study over 10 years. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2001;26:1443-7; discussion 1448.
33. Maeda T, Arizono T, Saito T, et al. Cervical alignment, range of motion, and instability after cervical laminoplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2002;132-8.
34. Chiba K, Ogawa Y, Ishii K, et al. Long-term results of expansive open-door laminoplasty for cervical myelopathy-average 14-year follow-up study. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2006;31:2998-3005.
35. Baisden J, Voo LM, Cusick JF, et al. Evaluation of cervical laminectomy and laminoplasty. A longitudinal study in the goat model. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1999;24:1283-8; discussion 1288-9.