Detection thresholds for rare, spectrally unique targets within semiarid rangelands

Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing

Volumn 76, Issue 11, 2010, Pages 1253-1259

  Weber, Keith T ^a   Chen, Fang ^a  

^a IDAHO STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

MAXIMUM LIKELIHOOD; PIXELS;

CLASSIFICATION ACCURACY; DETECTION THRESHOLD; KAPPA INDEX OF AGREEMENTS; MAXIMUM LIKELIHOOD CLASSIFICATIONS; MULTI-SPECTRAL IMAGERY; OVERALL ACCURACIES; SEMI-ARID RANGELAND; SPECTRAL SEPARABILITY;

SITE SELECTION;

ACCURACY ASSESSMENT; IMAGE CLASSIFICATION; MAXIMUM LIKELIHOOD ANALYSIS; MULTISPECTRAL IMAGE; QUICKBIRD; RANGELAND; SATELLITE IMAGERY; SEMIARID REGION;

EID: 78650567526     PISSN: 00991112     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.14358/PERS.76.11.1253     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Chavez, P. S., 1996. Image-based atmospheric corrections: Revisited and improved, Photogrammetric Engineering & Remote Sensing, 62(9):1025-1036.
2. Cheng, P., T. Toutin, Y. Zhang, and M. Wood, 2003. QuickBird - Geometric correction, path and block processing and data fusion, Earth Observation Magazine (EOM), May, pp. 24-30.
3. Cohen, J., 1960. A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales, Educational and Psychological Measurement, 20(1):37-46.
4. Congalton, R. G., and K. Green, 2009. Assessing the Accuracy of Remotely Sensed Data: Principles and Practices, CRC Press, Inc., Boca Raton, Florida, 183 p.
5. Dai, X., and S. Khorram, 1998. The effects of image misregistration on the accuracy of remotely sensed change detection, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 36:1566-1577
6. Foody, CM., 1992. On the compensation for chance agreement in image classification accuracy assessment, Photogrammetric Engineering & Remote Sensing, 58(10):1459-1460.
7. Foody, G. M., and M. K. Arora, 1997. An evaluation of some factors affecting the accuracy of classification by an artificial neural network, International Journal of Remote Sensing, 18(4):799-810.
8. Glenn, N. F., J. T. Mundt, K. T. Weber, T. S. Prather, L. W. Lass, and J. Pettingill, 2005. Hyperspectral data processing for repeat detection of small infestations of leafy spurge, Remote Sensing of Environment, 95(3):399-412.
9. Good, P. I. 2005. Resampling methods: A practical guide to data analysis, Third edition, Birkhauser, 218 p.
10. Goodchild, M. F., G. S. Biging, R. G. Congalton, P. G. Langley, N. R. Chrisman, and F. W. Davis, 1994. Final Report of the Accuracy Assessment Task Force, California Assembly Bill AB1580, Santa Barbara, University of California, National Center for Geographic Information and Analysis (NCGIA).
11. Landis, J. R., and G. G. Koch, 1977. The measurements of observer agreement for categorical data, Riometrics, 33(1):159-174.
12. Lillesand, T. M., and R. W. Kiefer, 2000. Remote Sensing and Image Interpretation, Fourth Edition, John Wiley and Sons, New York.
13. Mehner, H., M. Cutler, D. Fairbairn, and G. Thompson, 2004. Remote sensing of upland vegetation: The potential of high spatial resolution satellite sensors, Global Ecology and Biogeography, 13(4):359-369.
14. Monserud, R., and R. Leemans, 1992. Comparing global vegetation maps with the kappa statistic. Ecological Modeling, 62(4):275-293.
15. Mundt, J. T., N. F. Glenn, K. T. Weber, and J. Pettingill, 2006. Determining target detection limits and accuracy delineation using an incremental technique, Remote Sensing of Environment, 105(1):34-40.
16. Parcharidis, I., M. Foumelis, E. Papageorgiou, M. Segou, and V. Sakkas, 2005. Orthorectification and assessment of QuickBird imagery using D-GPS measurements over Paros urban area, Proceedings of the International Society for Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing 2005 Joint Conference, Tucson, Arizona, USA.
17. Parker-Williams, A., and E. R. Hunt, 2002. Estimation of leafy spurge cover from hyperspectral imagery using mixture tuned matched filtering, Remote Sensing of Environment, 82(2):446-456.
18. Richards, J. A., and X. Jia, 2006. Remote Sensing Digital Image Analysis, Fourth edition, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 439 p.
19. Robertson, B. C., 2003. Rigorous modeling and correction of Quick-Bird imagery, Proceedings of the IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium (IGARSS '03), Toulouse, France, pp. 797-802.
20. Roy, D. P., 2000. The impacts of misregistration upon composited wide field of view satellite data and implications for change detection, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 38(4):2017-2032.
21. Stow, D. A., 1999. Reducing the effects of misregistration on pixellevel change detection, International Journal of Remote Sensing, 20(12):2477-2483.
22. Titus, K., J. A. Mosher, and B. K. Williams, 1984. Chance-corrected classification for use in discriminant analysis: Ecological applications, The American Midland Naturalist, 111(1):1-7.
23. Toutin, T., and R. Chenier, 2004. GCP requirement for highresolution satellite mapping, Proceedings of the International Society for Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing 2004 Congress, Istanbul, Turkey.
24. Townshend, J. R. G., C. O. Justice, C. Gurney, and J. McManus, 1992. The impact of misregistration on change detection, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 30(5):1054-1060.
25. Verbyla, D. L., and S. H. Boles, 2000. Bias in land cover change estimates due to misregistration, International Journal of Remote Sensing, 21(18):3553-3560.
26. Wang, H., and E. C. Ellis, 2005. Image misregistration error in change measurements, Photogrammetric Engineering & Remote Sensing, 71(9):1037-1044.
27. Weber, K. T., 2006. Challenges of integrating geospatial technologies into rangeland research and management, Rangeland Ecology and Management, 59(1):38-43.
28. Weber, K. T., and J. Langille, 2007. Improving classification accuracy assessments with statistical bootstrap resampling techniques, GIS Science and Remote Sensing, 44(3):237-250.
29. Weber, K. T., N. F. Glenn, J. T. Mundt, and B. Gokhale, 2006. A comparison between multi-spectral and hyperspectral platforms for early detection of leafy spurge in southeastern Idaho, Final Report: Detection, Prediction, Impact, and Management of Invasive Plants Using GIS (K. T. Weber, editor) pp. 185-196, URL: http://giscenter.isu.edu/research/techpg/nasa-weeds/ pdf/multi-vs-hyper.pdf (last date accessed: 10 August 2010).
30. Weber, K. T., J. Theau, and K. Serr., 2008. Effect of co-registration error on patchy target detection using high-resolution imagery, Remote Sensing of Environment, 112(3):845-850.
31. th AGILE Conference on Geographic Information Science, Heraklion, Greece, pp. 447-455.