A high-order immersed boundary method for acoustic wave scattering and low-Mach number flow-induced sound in complex geometries

Journal of Computational Physics

Volumn 230, Issue 4, 2011, Pages 1000-1019

  Seo, Jung Hee ^a   Mittal, Rajat ^a  

^a Johns Hopkins University   (United States)

Author keywords

Computational aeroacoustics; Flow induced noise; Immersed boundary method; Phonation

Indexed keywords

ACOUSTIC NOISE; AERODYNAMICS; COMPUTATIONAL AEROACOUSTICS; GEOMETRY; INCOMPRESSIBLE FLOW; LEAST SQUARES APPROXIMATIONS; MACH NUMBER; TURBULENT FLOW;

COMPLEX GEOMETRIES; FLOW INDUCED; FLOW INDUCED NOISE; HIGH-ORDER; HIGHER-ORDER; IMMERSED BOUNDARY; IMMERSED BOUNDARY METHODS; LINEARIZED PERTURBED COMPRESSIBLE EQUATIONS; LOW-MACH-NUMBER FLOW; PHONATION;

ACOUSTIC WAVE SCATTERING;

EID: 78650559755     PISSN: 00219991     EISSN: 10902716     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcp.2010.10.017     Document Type: Article

References (62)

1. Stevens K.N. Acoustic Phonetics 1998, The MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, London, England.
2. Mittal R., Simmons S.P., Najjar F. Numerical study of pulsatile flow in a constricted channel. J. Fluid Mech. 2003, 485:337-378.
3. El-Seaier M., Lilja O., Lukkarinen S., Sörnmo L., Sepponen R., Pesonen E. Computer-based detection and analysis of heart sound and murmur. Ann. Biomed. Eng. 2005, 33(7):937-942.
4. Lehmann J. Auscultation of heart sounds. Am. J. Nursing 1972, 72(7):1242-1246.
5. Howe M.S. On the hydroacoustics of a trailing edge with a detached flap. J. Sound Vib. 2001, 239(4):801-817.
6. Bourgoyne D.A., Hamel J.M., Judge C.Q., Ceccio S.L., Dowling D.R. Hydrofoil near-wake sound sources at high Reynolds number. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 2002, 111(5):2425.
7. Howe M.S. Sound produced by a vortex interacting with a cavitated wake. J. Fluid Mech. 2005, 543:333-347.
8. Terai T. On calculation of sound fields around three dimensional objects by integral equation methods. J. Sound Vib. 1980, 69(1):71-100.
9. Shen L., Liu Y.J. An adaptive fast multipole boundary element method for three-dimensional acoustic wave problems based on the Burton-Miller formulation. Comput. Mech. 2007, 40:461-472.
10. Colonius T., Lele S.K. Computational aeroacoustics: progress on nonlinear problems of sound generation. Prog. Aerospace Sci. 2004, 40(6):345-416.
11. Bailly C., Bogey C., Marsden O. Progress in direct noise computation. Int. J. Aeroacoust. 2010, 9:123-143.
12. Lele S.K. Compact finite difference schemes with spectral-like resolution. J. Comput. Phys. 1992, 103:16-42.
13. Tam C.K.W., Webb J.C. Dispersion-relation-preserving finite difference schemes for computational acoustics. J. Comput. Phys. 1993, 107:262-281.
14. Sherer S.E., Scott J.N. High-order compact finite difference methods on general overset grids. J. Comput. Phys. 2005, 210:459-496.
15. S.E. Sherer, M.R. Visbal, High-order overset-grid simulations of acoustic scattering from multiple cylinders, in: Proceedings of the Fourth Computational Aeroacoustics (CAA) Workshop on Benchmark Problems, NASA/CP-2004-212954, 2004, pp. 255-266.
16. Hu F.Q., Hussaini M.Y., Rasetarinera P. An analysis of the discontinuous Galerkin for wave propagation problems. J. Comput. Phys. 1999, 151:921-946.
17. Chevaugeon N., Hillewaert K., Gallez X., Ploumhans P., Remacle J.-F. Optimal numerical parameterization of discontinuous Galerkin method applied to wave propagation problems. J. Comput. Phys. 2007, 223:188-207.
18. Dumbser M., Munz C.-D. ADER discontinuous Galerkin schemes for aeroacoustics. CR Mecanique 2005, 333:683-687.
19. T. Toulorge, Y. Reymen, W. Desmet, A 2D discontinuous Galerkin method for aeroacoustics with curved boundary treatment, in: Proceedings of International Conference on Noise and Vibration Engineering (ISMA2008), 2008, pp. 565-578.
20. Mittal R., Iaccarino G. Immersed boundary methods. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 2005, 37:239-261.
21. D. Casalino, P. Di Francescantonio, Y. Druon, GFD Predictions of Fan Noise Propagation, AIAA Paper, 2004-2989, 2004.
22. R. Arina, B. Mohammadi, An Immersed Boundary Method for Aeroacoustics Problems, AIAA Paper, 2008-3003, 2008.
23. M. Cand, 3-Dimensional Noise Propagation using a Cartesian Grid, AIAA Paper, 2004-2816, 2004.
24. Liu M., Wu K. Aerodynamic noise propagation simulation using immersed boundary method and finite volume optimized prefactored compact scheme. J. Therm. Sci. 2008, 17(4):361-367.
25. Linnick M.N., Fasel H.F. A high-order immersed interface method for simulating unsteady incompressible flows on irregular domains. J. Comput. Phys. 2005, 204:157-192.
26. de Tullio M.D., De Palma P., Iaccarino G., Pascazio G., Napolitano M. An immersed boundary method for compressible flows using local grid refinement. J. Comput. Phys. 2007, 225:2098-2117.
27. De Palma P., de Tullio M.D., Pascazio G., Napolitano M. An immersed boundary method for compressible viscous flows. Comput. Fluids 2006, 35:693-702.
28. Ghias R., Mittal R., Dong H. A sharp interface immersed boundary method for compressible viscous flows. J. Comput. Phys. 2007, 225:528-553.
29. Liu Q., Vasilyev O.V. A Brinkman penalization method for compressible flows in complex geometries. J. Comput. Phys. 2007, 227:946-966.
30. Hardin J.C., Pope D.S. An acoustic/viscous splitting technique for computational aeroacoustics. Theoret. Comput. Fluid Dyn. 1994, 6:323-340.
31. Seo J.H., Moon Y.J. The perturbed compressible equations for aeroacoustic noise prediction at low Mach numbers. AIAA J. 2005, 43:1716-1724.
32. Seo J.H., Moon Y.J. Linearized perturbed compressible equations for low Mach number aeroacoustics. J. Comput. Phys. 2006, 218:702-719.
33. Mittal R., Dong H., Bozkurttas M., Najjar F.M., Vargas A., von Loebbecke A. A versatile sharp interface immersed boundary method for incompressible flows with complex boundaries. J. Comput. Phys. 2008, 227:2852-4825.
34. Luo H., Mittal R., Zheng X., Bielamowicz S.A., Walsh R.J., Hahn J.K. An immersed-boundary method for flow-structure interaction in biological systems with application to phonation. J. Comput. Phys. 2008, 227:9303-9332.
35. Lighthill M.J. On sound generated aerodynamically. I. General theory. Proc. Royal Soc. London, Ser. A 1952, 211:564-587.
36. Seo J.H., Moon Y.J. Aerodynamic noise prediction for long-span bodies. J. Sound Vib. 2007, 306:564-579.
37. Moon Y.J., Seo J.H., Bae Y.M., Roger M., Becker S. A hybrid prediction for low-subsonic turbulent flow noise. Comput. Fluids 2010, 39:1125-1135.
38. Goldstein M.E. A generalized acoustic analogy. J. Fluid Mech. 2004, 488.
39. Chorin A.J. On the convergence of discrete approximations to the Navier-Stokes equations. Math. Comput. 1969, 23(106):341-353.
40. Jameson A. Numerical solution of the Euler equations for compressible inviscid fluids. Numerical Methods for the Euler Equations of Fluid Dynamics 1985, 199-245. SIAM, Philadelphia. F. Angrand, A. Dervieux, J.A. De side ri, R. Glowinski (Eds.).
41. Gaitonde D., Shang J.S., Young J.L. Practical aspects of higher-order accurate finite volume schemes for wave propagation phenomena. Int. J. Numer. Method Eng. 1999, 45:1849-1869.
42. Visbal M.R., Gaitonde D.V. High-order accurate methods for complex unsteady subsonic flows. AIAA J. 1999, 37(10):1231-1239.
43. Carnahan B., Luther H.A., James O.W. Applied Numerical Methods 1969, Wiley, New York.
44. Li Z. A fast interactive algorithm for elliptic interface problems. SIAM J. Numer. Anal. 1998, 35(1):230-254.
45. Press W.H., Teukolsky S.A., Vetterling W.T., Flannery B.P. Numerical Recipes: The Art of Scientific Computing 2007, Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, New York, Melbourne, Madrid, Cape Town, Singapore, Sao Paulo. third ed.
46. D.V. Gaitonde, M.R. Visbal, Further Development of a Navier-Stokes Solution Procedure Based on Higher-Order Formulations, Technical Paper 99-0557, AIAA Press, Washington, DC, 1999.
47. Visbal M.R., Gaitonde D.V. On the use of higher-order finite-difference schemes on curvilinear and deforming meshes. J. Comput. Phys. 2002, 181:155-185.
48. N.B. Edgar, M.R. Visbal, A General Buffer Zone Type Non-reflecting Boundary Condition for Computational Aeroacoustics, AIAA Paper 2003-3300, 2003.
49. C.K.W. Tam, J.C. Hardin (Eds.), Second Computational Aeroacoustics (CAA) Workshop on Benchmark Problems, NASA-CP-3352, 1997.
50. Sherer S.E. Scattering of sound from axisymmetric sources by multiple circular cylinders. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 2004, 115:488-496.
51. Morris P.J. Scattering of sound from a spatially distributed, spherically symmetric source by a sphere. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 1995, 98:3536-3539.
52. Williamson C.H.K. Vortex dynamics in the cylinder wake. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 1996, 28:477-539.
53. Henderson R.D. Detail of the drag curve near the onset of vortex shedding. Phys. Fluids 1995, 7:2102-2104.
54. Titze I.R. Principles of Voice Production 1994, Prentice Hall.
55. Zhao W., Zhang C., Frankel S.H., Mongeau L. Computational aeroacoustics of phonation, Part I: Computational methods and sound generation mechanism. J. Acou. Soc. Am. 2002, 112:2134-2146.
56. Bae Y., Moon Y.J. Computation of phonation aeroacoustics by an INS/PCE splitting method. Comput. Fluids 2008, 37:1332-1343.
57. Link G., Kaltenbacher M., Breuer M., Dollinger M. A 2D finite-element scheme for fluid-solid-acoustic interaction and its application to human phonation. Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. 2009, 198:3321-3334.
58. Zheng X., Bielamowicz S., Luo H., Mittal R. A computational study of the effect of false vocal folds on glottal flow and vocal fold vibration during phonation. Ann. Biomed. Eng. 2009, 37:625-642.
59. Fant G. Glottal flow: models and interaction. J. Phonet. 1986, 14:393-399.
60. Plumpe M.D., Quatieri T.F., Reynolds D.A. Modeling of the glottal flow derivative waveform with application to speaker identification. IEEE Trans. Speech Audio Proc. 1999, 7(5):569-586.
61. Stone M. Imaging the tongue and vocal tract. J. Disorder Commun. 1991, 26:11-23.
62. Guerin S., Thomy E., Wright M.C.M. Aeroacoustics of automotive vents. J. Sound Vib. 2005, 285:859-875.