Violation of local realism with freedom of choice

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America

Volumn 107, Issue 46, 2010, Pages 19708-19713

  Scheidl, Thomas ^a   Ursin, Rupert ^a   Kofler, Johannes ^a,b   Ramelow, Sven ^a,b   Ma, Xiao Song ^a,b   Herbst, Thomas ^b   Ratschbacher, Lothar ^a,c   Fedrizzi, Alessandro ^a,d   Langford, Nathan K ^a,e   Jennewein, Thomas ^a,f   Zeilinger, Anton ^a,b  

^a ERICH SCHMID INSTITUTE OF MATERIALS SCIENCE   (Austria)

^b UNIVERSITY OF VIENNA   (Austria)

^c UNIVERSITY OF CAMBRIDGE   (United Kingdom)

^d UNIVERSITY OF QUEENSLAND   (Australia)

^e UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD   (United Kingdom)

^f UNIVERSITY OF WATERLOO   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CONFERENCE PAPER; DECISION MAKING; FIELD EMISSION; FREEDOM; PHYSICS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUANTUM THEORY; STOCHASTIC MODEL;

EID: 78650527355     PISSN: 00278424     EISSN: 10916490     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1002780107     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Einstein A, Podolsky B, Rosen N (1935) Can quantum-mechanical description of physical reality be considered complete? Phys Rev 47:777-780.
2. Schrödinger E (1935) Die gegenwärtige Situation in der Quantenmechanik. Naturwissenschaften 23:807-812, 823-828, 844-849.
3. Bell JS (1964) On the Einstein Podolsky Rosen paradox. Physics 1:195-200.
4. Freedman SJ, Clauser JF (1972) Experimental test of local hidden-variable theories. Phys Rev Lett 28:938-941.
5. Fry ES, Thompson RC (1976) Experimental test of local hidden-variable theories. Phys Rev Lett 37:465-468.
6. Aspect A, Grangier P, Roger G (1982) Experimental realization of Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen-Bohm Gedankenexperiment: A new violation of Bell's inequalities. Phys Rev Lett 49:91-94.
7. Aspect A, Dalibard J, Roger G (1982) Experimental test of Bell's inequalities using time-varying analyzers. Phys Rev Lett 49:1804-1807.
8. Ou ZY, Mandel L (1988) Violation of Bell's inequality and classical probability in a two-photon correlation experiment. Phys Rev Lett 61:50-53.
9. Shih YH, Alley CO (1988) New type of Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen-Bohm experiment using pairs of light quanta produced by optical parametric down conversion. Phys Rev Lett 61:2921-2924.
10. Tapster PR, Rarity JG, Owens PCM (1994) Violation of Bell's inequality over 4 km of optical fiber. Phys Rev Lett 73:1923-1926.
11. Kwiat PG, Mattle K, Weinfurter H, Zeilinger A (1995) New high-intensity source of polarization-entangled photon pairs. Phys Rev Lett 75:4337-4341.
12. Tittel W, Brendel J, Zbinden H, Gisin N (1998) Violation of Bell inequalities by photons more than 10 km apart. Phys Rev Lett 81:3563-3566.
13. Weihs G, et al. (1998) Violation of Bell's inequality under strict Einstein locality conditions. Phys Rev Lett 81:5039-5043.
14. Rowe MA, et al. (2001) Experimental violation of a Bell's inequality with efficient detection. Nature 409:791-794.
15. Ursin R, et al. (2007) Entanglement-based quantum communication over 144 km. Nat Phys 3:481-486.
16. Ansmann M, et al. (2009) Violation of Bell's inequality in Josephson phase qubits.Nature 461:504-506.
17. Kwiat PG, Eberhard PH, Steinberg AM, Chiao RY (1994) Proposal for a loophole-free Bell inequality experiment. Phys Rev A 49:3209-3221.
18. García-Patrón R, et al. (2004) Proposal for a loophole-free Bell test using homodyne detection. Phys Rev Lett 93:130409.
19. Simon C, Irvine WTM (2003) Robust long-distance entanglement and a loophole-free Bell test with ions and photons. Phys Rev Lett 91:110405.
20. Volz J, et al. (2006) Observation of entanglement of a single photon with a trapped atom. Phys Rev Lett 96:030404.
21. Eberhard PH (1993) Background level and counter efficiencies required for a loophole-free Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen experiment. Phys Rev A 47:R747-R750.
22. Clauser JF, Shimony A (1978) Bell's theorem: Experimental tests and implications. Rep Prog Phys 41:1881-1927.
23. Bell JS (1971) Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, ed B d'Espagnat (Academic, New York), pp 171-181.
24. Clauser JF, Horne MA (1974) Experimental consequences of objective local theories. Phys Rev D 10:526-535.
25. Fine A (1982) Hidden variables, joint probabilities, and the Bell inequalities. Phys Rev Lett 48:291-295.
26. Jarrett JP (1984) On the physical significance of the locality conditions in the Bell argument. Noûs 18:569-589.
27. Bell JS, Clauser JF, Horne MA, Shimony A (1985) An Exchange on local beables. Dialectica 39:85-110.
28. Bell JS (2004) Speakable and Unspeakable in Quantum Mechanics (Cambridge Univ Press, Cambridge, UK), Rev Ed, pp 243-244.
29. Pearle PM (1970) Hidden-variable example based upon data rejection. Phys Rev D 2:1418-1425.
30. Jennewein T, Achleitner U, Weihs G, Weinfurter H, Zeilinger A (2000) A fast and compact quantum random number generator. Rev Sci Instrum 71:1675-1680.
31. Scheidl T, et al. (2009) Feasibility of 300 km quantum key distribution with entangled states. New J Phys 11:085002.
32. Fedrizzi A, Herbst T, Poppe A, Jennewein T, Zeilinger A (2007) A wavelength-tunable fiber-coupled source of narrowband entangled photons.Opt Express 15:15377-15386.
33. Clauser JF, Horne MA, Shimony A, Holt RA (1969) Proposed experiment to test local hidden-variable theories. Phys Rev Lett 23:880-884.
34. Fedrizzi A, et al. (2009) High-fidelity transmission of entanglement over a high-loss freespace channel. Nat Phys 5:389-392.
35. Born M (1926) Zur Quantenmechanik der Stoßvorgänge. Z Phys 37:863-867.
36. Wootters KM (1998) Entanglement of formation of an arbitrary state of two qubits. Phys Rev Lett 80:2245-2248.
37. James DFV, Kwiat PG, Munro WJ, White AG (2001) Measurement of qubits.Phys Rev A 64:052312.