Mass counts: ERP correlates of non-adjacent dependency learning under different exposure conditions

Neuroscience Letters

Volumn 487, Issue 3, 2011, Pages 282-286

  Citron, Francesca M M ^a   Oberecker, Regine ^b   Friederici, Angela D ^b   Mueller, Jutta L ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SUSSEX   (United Kingdom)

^b MAX PLANCK INSTITUTE FOR HUMAN COGNITIVE AND BRAIN SCIENCES   (Germany)

Author keywords

ERPs; Grammar; Language learning; Non adjacent dependency

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY; ACOUSTIC IMPEDANCE; ADULT; ARTICLE; ASSOCIATION; EVENT RELATED POTENTIAL; FEMALE; GRAMMAR; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; ITALY; LEARNING; MALE; PRIORITY JOURNAL;

ACOUSTIC STIMULATION; ADULT; BRAIN; BRAIN MAPPING; CUES; EVOKED POTENTIALS; FEMALE; HUMANS; LEARNING; MALE; MULTILINGUALISM; SPEECH PERCEPTION; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 78650522559     PISSN: 03043940     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.neulet.2010.10.038     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Cunillera T., Toro J.M., Sebastian-Galles N., Rodriguez-Fornells A. The effects of stress and statistical cues on continuous speech segmentation: an event-related brain potential study. Brain Research 2006, 1123:168-178.
2. De Diego Balaguer R., Toro J.M., Rodriguez-Fornells A., Bachoud-Levi A.-C. Different neurophysiological mechanisms underlying word and rule extraction from speech. PLoS One 2007, 2(11):e1175.
3. Elman J.L., Bates E.A., Johnson M.H., Karmiloff-Smith A., Parisi D., Plunkett K. Rethinking Innateness: A Connectionist Perspective on Development 1996, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
4. Friederici A.D. Towards a neural basis of auditory sentence processing. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 2002, 6:78-84.
5. Friederici A.D., Mecklinger A., Spencer K.M., Steinhauer K., Donchin E. Syntactic parsing preferences and their on-line revisions: a spatio-temporal analysis of event-related brain potentials. Cognitive Brain Research 2001, 11:305-323.
6. Friedman D., Cycowicz Y.M., Gaeta H. The novelty P3: an event-related brain potential (ERP) sign of the brain's evaluation of novelty. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews 2001, 25:355-373.
7. Gòmez R.L. Dynamically guided learning. Processes of Change in Brain and Cognitive Development: Attention and Performance XXI 2006, 87-110. M. Johnson, M. Munakata (Eds.).
8. Gòmez R.L., Maye J. The developmental trajectory of nonadjacent dependency learning. Infancy 2005, 7:183-206.
9. Kaan E., Swaab T.Y. Repair, revision, and complexity in syntactic analysis: an electrophysiological differentiation. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 2003, 12:98-110.
10. Kotchoubey B. Event-related potentials, cognition, and behavior: a biological approach. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews 2006, 30:42-65.
11. Kutas M., Federmeier K.D. Electrophysiology reveals semantic memory use in language comprehension. Trends in Cognitive Neuroscience 2000, 4:463-470.
12. Lau E.F., Phillips C., Poeppel D. A cortical network for semantics: (de)constructing the N400. Nature Reviews Neuroscience 2008, 9:920-933.
13. Mehler J., Jusczyk P.W., Lambertz G., Halsted N., Bertoncini J., Amiel-Tison C. A precursor of language acquisition in young infants. Cognition 1988, 29:143-178.
14. Morgan-Short K., Sanz C., Steinhauer K., Ullman M.T. Second language acquisition of gender agreement in explicit and implicit training conditions: an event-related potential study. Language Learning 2010, 60:154-193.
15. Mueller J.L. Electrophysiological correlates of second language processing. Second Language Research 2005, 21:152-174.
16. Mueller J.L., Bahlmann J., Friederici A.D. The role of pause cues in language learning: the emergence of event-related potentials related to sequence processing. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 2008, 20:892-905.
17. Mueller J.L., Girgsdies S., Friederici A.D. The impact of semantic-free second-language training on ERPs during case processing. Neuroscience Letters 2008, 443:77-81.
18. Mueller J.L., Oberecker R., Friederici A.D. Syntactic learning my mere exposure-an ERP study in adult learners. BMC Neuroscience 2009, 89.
19. Osterhout L., McLaughlin J., Pitkanen I., Frenck-Mestre C., Molinaro N. Novice learners, longitudinal designs, and event-related potentials: a means for exploring the neurocognition of second language processing. Language Learning 2006, 56(Suppl. 1):199-230.
20. Peña M., Bonatti L.L., Nespor M., Mehler J. Signal-driven computations in speech processing. Science 2002, 298:604-607.
21. Rossi S., Gugler M.F., Friederici A.D., Hahne A. The impact of proficiency on syntactic second-language processing of German and Italian: evidence from event-related potentials. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 2006, 18:2030-2048.
22. Sanders L.D., Newport E.L., Neville H.J. Segmenting nonsense: an event-related potential index of perceived onsets in continuous speech. Nature Neuroscience 2002, 5:700-703.
23. Smith S.L., Gerhardt K.J., Griffiths S.K., Huang X.Y., Abrams R.M. Intelligibility of sentences recorded from the uterus of a pregnant ewe and from the fetal inner ear. Audiology and Neuro-Otology 2003, 8:347-353.