Life-cycle assessment of a Solar Assist Plug-in Hybrid electric Tractor (SAPHT) in comparison with a conventional tractor

Energy Conversion and Management

Volumn 52, Issue 3, 2011, Pages 1700-1710

  Mousazadeh, Hossein ^a   Keyhani, Alireza ^a   Javadi, Arzhang ^b   Mobli, Hossein ^a   Abrinia, Karen ^a   Sharifi, Ahmad ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TEHRAN   (Iran)

^b AGRICULTURAL ENGINEERING RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (Iran)

Author keywords

Emission; Green house gas; Inflation; Life cycle; Renewable; Well to Wheel

Indexed keywords

COST OF ENERGIES; ECONOMICAL COSTS; ECONOMICAL EFFECTIVENESS; ELECTRIC TRACTORS; EMISSION; ENVIRONMENTAL EMISSIONS; ENVIRONMENTAL POLLUTIONS; INFLATION; LIFE CYCLE ANALYSIS; LIFE-CYCLE ASSESSMENTS; LIFECYCLE COSTS; OPERATING RANGES; PETROLEUM CONSUMPTION; PLUG-IN HYBRIDS; PURCHASE COST; RENEWABLE; UNIT PRICES; WELL TO WHEEL;

AGRICULTURAL IMPLEMENTS; AUTOMOBILES; CARBON DIOXIDE; COMBUSTION; COSTS; DIESEL FUELS; ELECTRIC VEHICLES; FOSSIL FUELS; GLOBAL WARMING; INTERNAL COMBUSTION ENGINES; OFF ROAD VEHICLES; POLLUTION; RATING; ROADS AND STREETS; TRACTORS (AGRICULTURAL); TRACTORS (TRUCK); WHEELS;

LIFE CYCLE;

EID: 78650522484     PISSN: 01968904     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.enconman.2010.10.033     Document Type: Article

References (56)

1. United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). Non-road engines and air pollution, Office of Mobile Resources, EPA 420-F-94-003, Washington, DC; 1996.
2. US Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Mobile Sources. Non-road engines and air pollution. [accessed January 2010].
3. United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). Air quality criteria for carbon monoxide, EPA-600/8-90-045A, Washington, DC; 1991.
4. Janssen S, Schettler T. Health implications of snowmobile use in Yellowstone National Park; 2003. 27p. .
5. S.J. Skerlos, and J. Winebrake Targeting plug-in hybrid electric vehicle policies to increase social benefits Energy Policy 38 2010 705 708
6. T.H. Bradley, and A.A. Frank Design, demonstrations and sustainability impact assessments for plug-in hybrid electric vehicles Renew Sust Energy Rev 13 2009 115 128
7. T.E. Lipman, and M.A. Delucchi A retail and lifecycle cost analysis of hybrid electric vehicles Transport Res D 11 2006 115 132
8. L.B. Lave, and H.L. Maclean An environmental-economic evaluation of hybrid electric vehicles: Toyota's Prius vs. its conventional internal combustion engine Corolla Transport Res D 7 2002 155 162
9. G.J. Offer, D. Howeyb, M. Contestabile, R. Clague, and N.P. Brandon Comparative analysis of battery electric, hydrogen fuel cell and hybrid vehicles in a future sustainable road transport system Energy Policy 38 2010 24 29
10. H.S. Mohamadabadi, G. Tichkowsky, and A. Kumar Development of a multi-criteria assessment model for ranking of renewable and non-renewable transportation fuel vehicles Energy 34 2009 112 125
11. M.A. Delucchi, and T.E. Lipman An analysis of the retail and lifecycle cost of battery-powered electric vehicles Transport Res D 6 2001 371 404
12. S. Eaves, and J. Eaves A cost comparison of fuel-cell and battery electric vehicles J Power Sources 130 2004 208 212
13. Petition for rulemaking seeking the regulation of greenhouse gas emissions from nonroad vehicles and engines; 2010. .
14. J.A. Dyer, and R.L. Desjardins Carbon dioxide emissions associated with the manufacturing of tractors and farm machinery in Canada Biosyst Eng 93 1 2006 107 118
15. H. Mousazadeh, A. Keyhani, H. Mobli, U. Bardi, G. Lombardi, and T. El-Asmar Environmental assessment of RAMseS multipurpose electric vehicle compared to a conventional combustion engine vehicle J Cleaner Prod 17 2009 781 790
16. H. Mousazadeh, A. Keyhani, H. Mobli, U. Bardi, G. Lombardi, and T. El-Asmar Technical and economical assessment of a multipurpose electric vehicle for farmers J Cleaner Prod 17 2009 1556 1562
17. P.A. Hansson, M. Lindgren, and O.A. Noren Comparison between different methods of calculating average engine emissions for agricultural tractors J Agric Eng Res 80 1 2001 37 43
18. Iran's Ministry of Power-Energy Scheduling Office. Iran's energy balance; 2004. .
19. National Aeronautics and Space Administration. [accessed December 2009].
20. W. Chen, H. Shen, B. Shu, H. Qin, and T. Deng Evaluation of performance of MPPT devices in PV systems with storage batteries Renew Energy 32 2007 1611 1622
21. Baltus CWA, Eikelboom JA, Zolingen RJC. Analytical monitoring of losses in PV systems. In: Paper presented at the 14th European photovoltaic solar energy conference, Barcelona; 30 June-4 July; 1997.
22. Otani K, Sakuta K, Sugiura T, Kurokawa K. Performance analysis and simulation on 100 Japanese residential grid-connected PV systems based on four year experience. In: 17th European photovoltaic solar energy conference and exhibition, Munich, Germany; 22-26 October, 2001.
23. A.F. Sherwani, J.A. Usmani, and Varun Life cycle assessment of solar PV based electricity generation systems: a review Renew Sust Energy Rev 14 2010 540 544
24. SABA Battery Company. [accessed January 2010].
25. S. Dhameja Electric vehicle battery systems, Electric vehicle battery efficiency 1st ed. 2001 Newnes p. 23-42 [Chapter 2]
26. U. Kohler, J. Kumpers, and M. Ullrich High performance nickel-metal hydride and lithium-ion batteries J Power Sources 105 2002 139 144
27. Matheys J, Autenboer WV. Sustainable batteries, Final public report. Vrije Universiteit Brussel - ETEC; 2005. .
28. Mousazadeh H, Keyhani A, Javadi A, Mobli H, Abrinia K, Sharifi A. Evaluation of the most suitable battery technology for solar assist plug-in hybrid electric tractor (SAPHT), Accepted paper; 2009.
29. Rantik M. Life cycle assessment of five batteries for electric vehicles under different charging regimes. The Swedish transport and communications research board (KFB); 1999. .
30. Matheys J, Timmermans JM, Autenboer WV, Mierlo JV, Maggetto G, Meyer S, et al. Comparison of the environmental impact of 5 electric vehicle battery technologies using LCA. In: 13th CIRP international conference on life cycle engineering; 2006. .
31. JohnDeer Tractor Manufacture Company. < http://www.deere.com/en-US/ag/ index.html > [accessed January 2010].
32. United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). [accessed January 2010].
33. Wikipedia - The Free Encyclopedia. [accessed January 2010].
34. United States Department of Energy. [accessed January 2010].
35. American Society of Agricultural and Biological Engineers (ASABE). Agricultural machinery management data. 53rd ed. MI (USA): ASABE: St. Joseph; 2006. [accessed 27.11.08].
36. Elert G. Energy density of diesel fuel. [accessed January 2010].
37. D. Hunt Farm power and machinery management 10th ed. 2001 Waveland Press Long Grove (IL, USA) p. 75-97
38. LCA Food Database. < http://www.lcafood.dk/ > [accessed January 2010].
39. A.A. Lazou, and A.D. Papatsoris The economics of photovoltaic stand-alone residential households: a case study for various European and Mediterranean locations Solar Energy Mater Solar Cells 62 2000 411 427
40. M.R. Nouni, S.C. Mullick, and T.C. Kandpal Photovoltaic projects for decentralized power supply in India: a financial evaluation Energy Policy 34 2006 3727 3738
41. J. MORRIS Estimation of tractor repair and maintenance costs J Agric Eng Res 41 1988 191 200
42. K.Y. Khouzam Technical and economic assessment of utility interactive systems for domestic applications in south east Queensland IEEE Trans Energy Convers 14 1999 1544 1550
43. Edward J. Economic impact analysis of New Jersey's proposed 20% renewable portfolio standard. The report was prepared by: The Center for Energy, Economic and Environmental Policy, The State University of New Jersey; 2004. [accessed January 2010].
44. United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). Exhaust and crankcase emission factors for non-road engine modeling compression-ignition. EPA420-P-04-009; 2004. .
45. SimaPro introduction to LCA. [accessed January 2010].
46. Bickel P, Friedrich R, Burgess A, Fagiani P, Hunt A, Jong GD, et al. Developing harmonised european approaches for transport costing and project assessment (HEATCO), FP6-2002-SSP-1/502481; 2006. [accessed January 2010].
47. Alsema EA, Fthenakis VM. PV energy payback and greenhouse gas emissions: 2004 status, fact sheet; 2005. .
48. The 2008 world factbook. .
49. Soltani G, Saboohi M. Economic and social impacts of groundwater overdraft: the case of Iran. In: 15th ERF annual conference, Cairo, Egypt; 23-25 November, 2008.
50. Lemonpress.ir. [accessed January 2010].
51. Fars News Agency. [accessed January 2010].
52. M. Granovskii, I. Dincer, and M.A. Rosen Economic and environmental comparison of conventional, hybrid, electric and hydrogen fuel cell vehicles J Power Sources 159 2006 1186 1193 (Pubitemid 44301692)
53. B. Bouzidi, M. Haddadi, and O. Belmokhtar Assessment of a photovoltaic pumping system in the areas of the Algerian Sahara Renew Sust Energy Rev 13 4 2009 879 886
54. C.W. Ajan, S.S. Ahmed, H.B. Ahmad, F. Taha, and A.A.B. Mohd-Zin On the policy of photovoltaic and diesel generation mix for an off-grid site: East Malaysian perspectives Solar Energy 74 2003 453 467
55. O.U. Oparaku Rural area power supply in Nigeria: a cost comparison of the photovoltaic, diesel/gasoline generator and grid utility options Renew Energy 28 2003 2089 2098
56. A.N. Celik Present status of photovoltaic energy in Turkey and life cycle techno-economic analysis of a grid-connected photovoltaic-house Renew Sust Energy Rev 10 2006 370 387