Mobilisation capacity for agri-environmental management

Journal of Environmental Management

Volumn 92, Issue 3, 2011, Pages 1023-1032

  Van Herzele, Ann ^a,b   Dendoncker, Nicolas ^c   Acosta Michlik, Lilibeth ^d,e  

^a RESEARCH INSTITUTE FOR NATURE AND FOREST INBO   (Belgium)

^b FREE UNIVERSITY OF BRUSSELS   (Belgium)

^c UNIVERSITY OF NAMUR   (Belgium)

^d POTSDAM INSTITUTE FOR CLIMATE IMPACT RESEARCH   (Germany)

^e UNIVERSITÉ CATHOLIQUE DE LOUVAIN   (Belgium)

Author keywords

Actor Network Theory; Agri environmental measures; Fluidity; Policy instruments; Social networks

Indexed keywords

AGRICULTURE; SOCIAL SCIENCES COMPUTING;

ACTOR-NETWORK; ACTOR-NETWORK THEORY; AGRI-ENVIRONMENTAL MEASURE; AGRICULTURAL POLICIES; ENVIRONMENTAL CONCERNS; ENVIRONMENTAL MEASURES; FLANDERS; MOBILISATION; POLICY INSTRUMENTS; SOCIAL NETWORK;

ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT;

ACTOR NETWORK THEORY; AGRI-ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY; AGRICULTURAL MANAGEMENT; ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT; MOBILIZATION;

AGRICULTURAL LAND; AGRICULTURAL WORKER; AGRICULTURE; ARTICLE; BELGIUM; CASE STUDY; ECOLOGY; ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT; MOBILIZATION CAPACITY; POLICY; THEORY; URBANIZATION;

BELGIUM;

EID: 78650520383     PISSN: 03014797     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2010.11.013     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Aarts N., van Woerkum C., Vermunt B. Policy and planning in de Dutch countryside: the role of regional innovation networks. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management 2007, 50(6):727-744.
2. Bonnieux F., Dupraz P. Policy indicators and a typology of instruments. Countryside Stewardship: Farmers, Policies and Markets 1999, 47-66. Elsevier Science, Oxford. G. Van Huylenbroeck, M. Whitby (Eds.).
3. Bowker G.C., Star S.L. Sorting Things Out: Classification and Its Consequences 1999, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
4. Brotherton I. What limits participation in ESAs?. Journal of Environmental Management 1991, 32:241-249.
5. Burgess J., Clark J., Harrison C.M. Knowledges in action: an actor network analysis of a wetland agri-environment scheme. Ecological Economics 2000, 35:119-132.
6. Burton R.J.F., Kuczera C., Schwartz G. Exploring farmers' cultural resistance to voluntary agri-environmental schemes. Sociologia Ruralis 2008, 48(1):16-37.
7. Clark J.R.A., Jones A., Potter C.A., Lobley M. Conceptualising the evolution of the European Union's agri-environment policy: a discourse approach. Environment and Planning A 1997, 29:1869-1885.
8. Curry N., Winter M. The transition to environmental agriculture in Europe: learning processes and knowledge networks. European Planning Studies 2000, 8(1):107-121.
9. De Laet M., Mol A. The Zimbabwe bush pump: mechanics of a fluid technology. Social Studies of Science 2000, 30:225-263.
10. De Sousa I.S.F., Busch L. Networks and agricultural development: the case of soybean production and consumption in Brazil. Rural Sociology 1998, 63(3):349-371.
11. Dessein J., Nevens F. 'I'm sad to be glad' An analysis of farmers' pride in Belgium. Sociologia Ruralis 2007, 47(3):273-292.
12. Agriculture and the Environment 2003, European Commission, European Commission, Directorate-General for Agriculture, Brussels.
13. Agri-Environment Measures: Overview on General Principles, Types of Measures, and Application 2005, European Commission, European Commission, Directorate General for Agriculture and Rural Development Unit G-4, Brussels.
14. Healey P. Building institutional capacity through collaborative approaches to planning. Environment and Planning B 1998, 30:1531-1546.
15. Healey P., de Magalhaes C., Madanipour A., Pendlebury J. Place, identity and local politics: analysing initiatives in deliberative governance. Deliberative Policy Analysis - Understanding Governance in the Network Society 2003, 60-87. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
16. Jorgensen U., Sorensen O.H. Arenas of development - a space populated by actor-worlds, artefacts, and surprises. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management 1999, 11(3):409-429.
17. Kaljonen M. Co-construction of agency and environmental management. The case of agri-environmental policy implementation at Finnish farms. Journal of Rural Studies 2006, 22(2):205-216.
18. Latour B. Reassembling the Social. An Introduction to Actor-Network-Theory 2005, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
19. Law J., Mol A. Situating technoscience: an inquiry into spatialities. Environment and Planning D 2001, 19:609-621.
20. Lockie S. Networks of agri-environmental action: temporality, spatiality and identity in agricultural environments. Sociologia Ruralis 2006, 46(1):22-39.
21. Lockie S., Kitto S. Beyond the farm gate: production-consumption networks and agri-food research. Sociologia Ruralis 2000, 40(1):3-19.
22. Mazorra A.P. Agri-environmental policy in Spain. The agenda of socio-political developments at the national, regional and local levels. Journal of Rural Studies 2001, 17:81-97.
23. Morris C. Networks of agri-environmental policy implementation: a case study of England's Countryside Stewardship scheme. Land Use Policy 2004, 21:177-191.
24. Morris J., Mills J., Crawford I.M. Promoting farmer uptake of agri-environmental schemes: the Countryside Stewardship arable options scheme. Land Use Policy 2000, 17(3):241-254.
25. Murdoch J. Ecologising sociology: Actor-network theory, co-construction and the problem of human exemptionalism. Sociology 2001, 35(1):111-133.
26. Murdoch J. Post-structuralist Geography: a Guide to Relational Space 2006, Sage, London.
27. Prager K., Freese J. Stakeholder involvement in agri-environmental policy making - Learning from a local and a state-level approach in Germany. Journal of Environmental Management 2009, 90(2):1154-1167.
28. Prager K., Nagel U.J. Participatory decision making on agri-environmental programmes: a case study from Sachsen-Anhalt (Germany). Land Use Policy 2008, 25:106-115.
29. Riley M. Reconsidering conceptualisations of farm conservation activity: the case of conserving hay meadows. Journal of Rural Studies 2006, 22:337-353.
30. Schmitzberger I., Wrbka T., Steurer B., Aschenbrenner G., Peterseil J., Zechmester H.G. How farming styles influence biodiversity maintenance in Austrian agricultural landscapes. Agriculture Ecosystems & Environment 2005, 108(3):274-290.
31. Tarrow S. Power in Movement 1994, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
32. Thrift N. Spatial Formations 1996, Sage, London.
33. Van Herzele A. A Tree on Your Doorstep, a Forest in Your Mind: Greenspace Planning at the Interplay Between Discourse, Physical Conditions and Practice 2005, Wageningen University and Research Center, Wageningen.
34. Van Herzele A. A forest for each city and town: story lines in the policy debate for urban forests in Flanders. Urban Studies 2006, 43(3):673-696.
35. Verstraeten G., Poesen J. The nature of small-scale flooding, muddy floods and retention pond sedimentation in central Belgium. Geomorphology 1999, 29:275-292.
36. Wilson G.A. Factors influencing farmer participation in the environmentally sensitive areas scheme. Journal of Environmental Management 1997, 50:67-93.
37. Wilson G.A., Buller H. The use of socio-economic and environmental indicators in assessing the effectiveness of EU agri-environmental policy. European Environment 2001, 11:297-313.
38. Wilson G.A., Hart K. Farmer participation in agri-environmental schemes: towards conservation-oriented thinking?. Sociologia Ruralis 2001, 41(2):254-274.