Effects of maturity stage, wilting and acid treatment on crude protein fractions and chemical composition of whole crop pea silages (Pisum sativum L.)

Animal Feed Science and Technology

Volumn 163, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 11-19

  Rondahl, T ^a   Bertilsson, J ^a   Martinsson, K ^a  

^a SWEDISH UNIVERSITY OF AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Cultivars; Nitrogen losses; Peas; Ruminant; Whole crop silage

Indexed keywords

BOVIDAE; CAPELLA; PISUM SATIVUM;

EID: 78650516800     PISSN: 03778401     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2010.09.017     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Adesogan A., Salawu M. Effect of applying formic acid, heterolactic bacteria or homolactic and heterolactic bacteria on the fermentation of bi-crops of peas and wheat. J. Sci. Food Agric. 2004, 84:983-992.
2. Aman P., Graham H. Whole-crop peas. 1. Changes in botanical and chemical composition and rumen in vitro degradability during maturation. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 1987, 17:15-31.
3. Andersson R., Hedlund B. HPLC analysis of organic acids in lactic acid fermented vegetables. Z. Lebensm. Unters. Forsch. 1983, 176:440-443.
4. AOAC Official Methods of Analysis 2000, Association of Official Analytical Chemists, Washington, DC, USA. 17th ed.
5. Borreani G., Cavallarin L., Antoniazzi S., Tabacco E. Effect of the stage of growth, wilting and inoculation in field pea (Pisum sativum L.) silages. I. Herbage composition and silage fermentation. J. Sci. Food Agric. 2006, 86:1377-1382.
6. Carpintero C.M., Henderson A.R., McDonald P. The effect of some pre-treatments on proteolysis during the ensiling of herbage. Grass. Forage Sci. 1979, 34:311-315.
7. Cavallarin L., Antoniazzi S., Tabacco E., Borreani G. Effect of the stage of growth, wilting and inoculation in field pea (Pisum sativum L.) silages. II. Nitrogen fractions and amino acid compositions of herbage and silage. J. Sci. Food Agric. 2006, 86:1383-1390.
8. Charmley E., Thomas C. Wilting of herbage prior to ensiling: effects on conservation losses, silage fermentation and growth of beef cattle. Anim. Prod. 1987, 45:191-203.
9. Charmley E., Veira D.M. Inhibition of proteolysis at harvest using heat in alfalfa silages: effects on silage composition and digestion by sheep. J. Anim. Sci. 1990, 68:758-766.
10. Christensen D.A., Mustafa A.F. The use of peas in dairy rations. Adv. Dairy Technol. 2000, 12:293-302.
11. Dandanell-Daveby Y., Abrahamsson M., Åman P. Changes in chemical composition during development of three different types of peas. J. Sci. Food Agric. 1993, 63:21-28.
12. Finley J.W., Pallavicini C., Kohler G.O. Partial isolation and characterisation of Medicago sativa leaf proteases. J. Sci. Food Agric. 1980, 31:156-161.
13. Fraser M.D., Fychan R., Jones R. The effect of harvest date and inoculation on the yield, fermentation characteristics and feeding value of forage pea and field bean silages. Grass Forage Sci. 2001, 56:218-230.
14. Heron S.J.E., Edwards R.A., Phillips P. Effect of pH on the activity of ryegrass Lolium multiflorum proteases. J. Sci. Food Agric. 1989, 46:267-277.
15. Jones B.A., Satter L.D., Muck R.E. Influence of bacterial inoculant and substrate addition to lucerne ensiled at different dry matter contents. Grass Forage Sci. 1992, 47:19-27.
16. Kristensen V.F. The production and feeding of whole-crop cereals and legumes in Denmark. Whole-Crop Cereals 1992, 21-37. Chalcombe Publications, Kingston, Kent, UK. 2nd ed. B.A. Stark, J.M. Wilkinson (Eds.).
17. Larsson, K., Bengtsson S., 1983. Bestämning av lätt tillgängliga kolhydrater i växtmaterial [Determination of nonstructural carbohydrates in plant material]. Method Description no. 22. National Laboratory of Agricultural Chemistry, Uppsala, Sweden.
18. McDonald P., Henderson N. Buffering capacity of herbage samples as a factor in ensilage. J. Sci. Food Agric. 1962, 13:395-400.
19. McDonald P., Henderson A.R., Heron S.J.E. The Biochemistry of Silage 1991, Chalcombe Publications, Marlow, UK. 2nd ed.
20. McKersie B.D. Effect of pH on proteolysis in ensiled legume forage. Agron. J. 1985, 77:81-86.
21. Minitab Minitab 14® Statistical Software for Windows® 2008, Minitab Inc., State College, PA, USA.
22. Muck R.E. Factors influencing silage quality and their implications for management. J. Dairy Sci. 1988, 71:2992-3002.
23. Murphy M., Åkerlind M., Holtenius K. Rumen fermentation in lactating cows selected for milk fat content fed two forage to concentrate ratios with hay or silage. J. Dairy Sci. 2000, 83:756-764.
24. Mustafa A.F., Christensen D.A., McKinnon J.J. Effects of pea, barley, and alfalfa silage on ruminal nutrient degradability and performance of dairy cows. J. Dairy Sci. 2000, 83:2859-2865.
25. Mustafa A.F., Seguin P., Ouellet D.R., Adelye I. Effects of cultivars on ensiling characteristics, chemical composition, and ruminal degradability of pea silage. J. Dairy Sci. 2002, 85:3411-3419.
26. Nagel S.A., Broderick G.A. Effect of formic acid or formaldehyde treatment of alfalfa silage on nutrient utilization by dairy cows. J. Dairy Sci. 1992, 75:140-154.
27. Owens V.N., Albrecht K.A., Muck R.E. Protein degradation and fermentation characteristics of unwilted red clover and alfalfa silage harvested at various times during the day. Grass Forage Sci. 2002, 57:329-341.
28. Papadopoulos Y.A., McKersie B.D. A comparison of protein degradation during wilting and ensiling of six forage species. Can. J. Plant Sci. 1983, 63:903-912.
29. Playne M.J., McDonald P. The buffering constituents of herbage and of silage. J. Sci. Food Agric. 1966, 17:264-268.
30. Pursiainen P., Tuori M. Effect of ensiling field bean, field pea and common vetch in different proportions with whole-crop wheat using formic acid or an inoculant on fermentation characteristics. Grass Forage Sci. 2008, 63:60-78.
31. Roe M.B., Sniffen C.J. Techniques for measuring protein fractions in feedstuffs. Proceedings of the Cornell Nutritional Conference 1990, 81-88.
32. Salawu M.B., Adesogan A.T., Weston C.N., Williams S.P. Dry matter yield and nutritive value of pea/wheat bi-crops differing in maturity at harvest, pea to wheat ratio and pea variety. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 2001, 94:77-87.
33. Scheffé H. The Analysis of Variance, 5th printing 1967 1959, J. Wiley & Sons, New York, NY, USA.
34. SMHI, 2007. Swedish Meteorologic and Hydrologic Institute Database. SMHI, Norrköping, Sweden.
35. Sniffen C., O'Connor J., Van Soest P., Fox D., Russell J. A net carbohydrate and protein system for evaluating cattle diets. II. Carbohydrate and protein availability. J. Anim. Sci. 1992, 70:3562-3577.
36. Vagnoni D.B., Broderick G.A., Muck R.E. Preservation of protein in wilted lucerne using formic, sulphuric or trichloroacetic acid. Grass Forage Sci. 1997, 52:5-11.
37. Wilkins R.J., Jones R. Alternative home-grown protein sources for ruminants in the United Kingdom. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 2000, 85:23-32.