Combining MEG and EEG source modeling in epilepsy evaluations

Journal of Clinical Neurophysiology

Volumn 27, Issue 6, 2010, Pages 360-371

  Ebersole, John S ^a,b   Ebersole, Susan M ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO   (United States)

^b ALEXIAN BROTHERS MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

EEG dipole; Epilepsy; MEG dipole; Source modeling

Indexed keywords

BRAIN MAPPING; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC TEST ACCURACY STUDY; DIPOLE; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAM; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; EPILEPSY; EPILEPTIC DISCHARGE; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MAGNETOENCEPHALOGRAPHY; MODEL; REVIEW; SPIKE WAVE; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING;

ANIMALS; BRAIN; BRAIN MAPPING; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; EPILEPSY; HUMANS; MAGNETOENCEPHALOGRAPHY;

EID: 78650516685     PISSN: 07360258     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/WNP.0b013e318201ffc4     Document Type: Review

References (13)

1. Baumgartner C, Barth DS, Levesque MF, Sutherling WW. Detection of epileptiform discharges on magnetoencephalography in comparison to invasive measurements. In: Hoke M, Erne SN, Okada YC, Romani GL, eds. Biomagnetism: Clinical Aspects. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 1992:67-71.
2. Ebersole JS. Equivalent dipole modeling: A new EEG method for epileptogenic focus localization. In: Pedley TA, Meldrum BS, eds. Recent Advances in Epilepsy. 5th ed. Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone, 1991;51-72.
3. Ebersole JS, Squires K, Gamelin J, et al. Simultaneous MEG and EEG provide complementary dipole models of temporal lobe spikes. Epilepsia. 1993; 34(suppl 6):143.
4. Fuchs M, Wagner M, Kastner J. Confidence limits of dipole source reconstruction results. Clin Neurophysiol. 2004;115:1442-1451.
5. Fuchs M, Wagner M, Wischmann HA, et al. Improving source reconstructions by combining bioelectric and biomagnetic data. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1998;107:93-111.
6. Iwasaki M, Pestana E, Burgess RC, et al. Detection of epileptiform activity by human interpreters: Blinded comparison between electroencephalography and magnetoencephalography. Epilepsia. 2005;46:59-68.
7. Mikuni N, Nagamine T, Ikeda A, et al. Simultaneous recording of epileptiform discharges by MEG and subdural electrodes in temporal lobe epilepsy. Neuroimage. 1997;5:298-306.
8. Nakasato N, Levesque MF, Barth D, et al. Comparisons of MEG, EEG, and ECOG source localization in neocortical partial epilepsy in humans. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1994;171:171-178.
9. Oishi M, Otsubo H, Kameyama S, et al. Epileptic spikes: Magnetoencephalography versus simultaneous electrocorticography. Epilepsia. 2002;43:1390-1395.
10. Paetau R, Hamalainen M, Hari R, et al. Magnetoencephalographic evaluation of children and adolescents with intractable epilepsy. Epilepsia. 1994;35:275.
11. Park H, Nakasato N, Iwasaki M, et al. Detectability of convexity spikes by conventional EEG and helmet MEG. In: Nowak H, Haueisen J, Giessler F, Huonker R, eds. Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Biomagnetism. Berlin: VDE Verlag GMBH, 2002:260-262.
12. Scheler G, Fischer M, Hummel C, et al. Variation of MEG and EEG localisations due to different volume conductors. In: Halgren E, Ahlfors S, Hämäläinen M, Cohen D, eds. BIOMAG 2004. Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Biomagnetism. Boston, USA, 2004;751.
13. Tao JX, Ray A, Hawes-Ebersole S, Ebersole JS. Intracranial EEG substrates of scalp EEG interictal spikes. Epilepsia. 2005;46:669-676.