Membrane mass transport by nanofiltration: Coupled effect of the polarization and membrane layers

Journal of Membrane Science

Volumn 368, Issue 1-2, 2011, Pages 215-222

  Nagy, Endre ^a   Kulcsár, Edina ^a   Nagy, András ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PANNONIA   (Hungary)

^b CENTRAL FOOD RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (Hungary)

Author keywords

Concentration polarization; Nanofiltration; Polarization modulus; Rejection coefficient; Simultaneous effect of polarization and membrane layer

Indexed keywords

CONCENTRATION BOUNDARY LAYER; CONCENTRATION POLARIZATION; COUPLED EFFECT; DIFFUSIVE MASS TRANSFER; DIFFUSIVE MASS TRANSPORT; GENERAL MODEL; GENERAL TREATMENT METHODS; MASS TRANSPORT; MEMBRANE LAYERS; PARTITION COEFFICIENT; PERMEATE CONCENTRATIONS; PRESSURE DRIVEN MEMBRANES; REJECTION COEFFICIENTS; SEPARATION EFFICIENCY; SIMULTANEOUS EFFECT OF POLARIZATION AND MEMBRANE LAYER;

BOUNDARY LAYERS; CONCENTRATION (PROCESS); MASS TRANSFER; NANOFILTRATION; POLARIZATION; PRESSURE EFFECTS; ULTRAFILTRATION;

NANOFILTRATION MEMBRANES;

ARTICLE; MATHEMATICAL ANALYSIS; MEMBRANE TRANSPORT; NANOFILTRATION; POLARIZATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SEPARATION TECHNIQUE;

EID: 78650512872     PISSN: 03767388     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.memsci.2010.11.046     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Deen W.M. Hindered transport of large molecules in liquid-filled pores. AIChE J. 1987, 33:1409-1425.
2. Bowen W.R., Mohammad A.W. Characterization and prediction of nanofiltration membrane performance-a general assessment. Trans. IChemE 1998, 76(Part A):885-893.
3. Bowen W.R., Welfoot J.S. Modelling the performance of membrane nanofiltration-critical assessment and model development. Chem. Eng. Sci. 2002, 57:1121-1137.
4. Kovács Z., Samhaber W. Characterization of nanofiltration membranes with uncharged solutes. Membrántechnika 2008, 12(2):22-36. (in English).
5. Van der Bruggen B., Schaep J., Wilms D., Vandercasteele C. Influence of molecular size, polarity and charge on the retention of organic molecules by nanofiltration. J. Membr. Sci. 1999, 156:29-41.
6. Baker R.W. Membrane Technology and Applications 2004, Wiley & Sons, Chichester, England. second ed.
7. Brian P.L.T. Mass transport in reverse osmosis. Desalination by Reverse Osmosis 1966, 181. MIT Press, Cambridge. U. Merten (Ed.).
8. Kim S., Hoek E.M.V. Modeling concentration polarization in reverse osmosis processes. Desalination 2005, 186:11-128.
9. Bhattacharya S., Hwang S.-T. Concentration polarization, separation factor, and Peclet number in membrane processes. J. Membr. Sci. 1997, 132:73-90.
10. Baker R.W., Wijmans J.G., Athayde A.L., Daniels R., Ly J.H., Le M. The effect of concentration polarization on the separation of volatile organic compounds from water by pervaporation. J. Membr. Sci. 1997, 137:159-172.
11. De S., Bhattacharya P.K. Modeling of ultrafiltration process for a two-component aqueous solution of low and high (gel-forming) molecular weight solutes. J. Membr. sci. 1997, 136:57-69.
12. Sablani S.S., Goosen M.F.A., Al-Belushi R., Wilf M. Concentration polarization in ultrafiltration and reverse osmosis: a critical review. Desalination 2001, 141:269-289.
13. Zydney A.L. Stagnant film model for concentration polarization in membrane systems. J. Membr. Sci. 1997, 130:275-281.
14. Song L.F., Yu S.C. Concentration polarization in cross-flow reverse osmosis. AIChE J. 1999, 45:921.
15. Song L.F., Elimelech M. Theory of concentration polarization in cross-flow filtration. J. Chem. Soc. Faraday Trans. 1995, 91:3389.
16. Song L. A new model for the calculation of the limiting flux in ultrafiltration. J. Membr. Sci. 1998, 144:173-185.
17. Cebeci T., Shao J.P., Kafyeke F., Laurendeau E. Computational Fluid Dynamics for Engineers 2005, Springers, Heidelberg.
18. Darvishmanesh S., Buekenhoudt A., Degréve J., Van der Bruggen B. General model for prediction of solvent through organic and inorganic solvent resistant nanofiltration membranes. J. Membr. Sci. 2009, 334:43-49.
19. Dijkstra M.F.J., Bach S., Ebert K. A transport model for organophilic nanofiltration. J. Membr. Sci. 2006, 286:60-68.
20. Zhao Y., Yuan Q. A comparison of nanofiltration with aqueous and organic solvents. J. Membr. Sci. 2006, 279:453-458.
21. Nagy E. Mathematical modeling of biochemical membrane reactors. Membrane Operations 2009, 309-332. Wiley VCH Verlag, Veinheim. E. Drioli, L. Giorno (Eds.).
22. Van der Bruggen B., Vandecasteele C. Modelling of the retention of uncharged molecules with nanofiltration. Water Res. 2002, 36:1360-1368.
23. Nagy E., Kulcsár E. Mass transport through biocatalytic membrane reactors. Desalination 2009, 245:422-436.
24. Nagy E. Basic equations of mass transfer through biocatalytic membrane layer. Asia-Pacific J. Chem. Eng. 2009, 4:270-278.
25. Nagy E. Coupled effect of the membrane properties and concentration polarization in pervaporation: unified mass transport model. Sep. Purif Technol. 2010, 73:194-201.
26. Crowder M.L., Gooding Ch.H. Spiral wound, hollow fiber membrane modules: a new approach to higher mass transfer efficiency. J. Membr. Sci. 1997, 137:17-29.
27. Peeva L.G., Gibbins E., Luthra S.S., White L.S., Stateva R.P., Livingston A.G. Effect of concentration polarization and osmotic pressure on flux in organic solvent nanofiltration. J. Membr. Sci. 2004, 236:121-136.
28. Espinoza-Gómez H., Lin Sh.W., Rogel-Hernández E. Nanofiltration membrane pore diameter determination. Rev. Soc. Quim. Méx 2004, 48:15-20.