Phosphorylcholine-coated silicone implants: Effect on inflammatory response and fibrous capsule formation

Annals of Plastic Surgery

Volumn 65, Issue 6, 2010, Pages 560-564

  Zeplin, Philip H ^a   Larena Avellaneda, Axel ^a   Jordan, Martin ^a   Laske, Martin ^b   Schmidt, Karsten ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL WÜRZBURG   (Germany)

^b Department of Surgery   (Germany)

Author keywords

foreign body response; Phosphorylcholine; silicone implant; surface modification

Indexed keywords

BIOMATERIAL; CD4 ANTIGEN; CD68 ANTIGEN, HUMAN; CD8 ANTIGEN; COLLAGEN; DIFFERENTIATION ANTIGEN; LEUKOCYTE ANTIGEN; PHOSPHORYLCHOLINE; SILICONE DERIVATIVE; TRANSFORMING GROWTH FACTOR BETA;

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; BIOSYNTHESIS; BREAST ENDOPROSTHESIS; FIBROBLAST; FIBROSIS; FOREIGN BODY REACTION; IMMUNOHISTOCHEMISTRY; METABOLISM; PATHOLOGY; RAT; SPRAGUE DAWLEY RAT; SURFACE PROPERTY;

ANIMALS; ANTIGENS, CD; ANTIGENS, CD4; ANTIGENS, CD8; ANTIGENS, DIFFERENTIATION, MYELOMONOCYTIC; BREAST IMPLANTS; COATED MATERIALS, BIOCOMPATIBLE; COLLAGEN; FIBROBLASTS; FIBROSIS; FOREIGN-BODY REACTION; IMMUNOHISTOCHEMISTRY; PHOSPHORYLCHOLINE; RATS; RATS, SPRAGUE-DAWLEY; SILICONES; SURFACE PROPERTIES; TRANSFORMING GROWTH FACTOR BETA;

EID: 78650510236     PISSN: 01487043     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/SAP.0b013e3181d6e326     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Iwuagwu FC, Frame JD. Silicone breast implants: complications. Br J Plast Surg. 1997;50:632-636.
2. Alfano C, Mazzocchi M, Scuderi N. Mammary compliance: an objective measurement of capsular contracture. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2004;28:75-79.
3. Pajkos A, Deva AK, Vickery K, et al. Detection of subclinical infection in significant breast implant capsules. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2003;111:1605-1611.
4. Henriques M, Sousa C, Lira M, et al. Adhesion of Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Staphylococcus epidermidis to silicone-hydrogel contact lenses. Optom Vis Sci. 2005;82:446-450.
5. Dobke MK, Svahn JK, Vastine VL, et al. Characterization of microbial presence at the surface of silicone mammary implants. Ann Plast Surg. 1995;34:563-569; discussion 570-571.
6. Handel N, Cordray T, Gutierrez J, et al. A long-term study of outcomes, complications, and patient satisfaction with breast implants. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2006;117:757-767.
7. Pittet B, Montandon D, Pittet D. Infection in breast implants. Lancet Infect Dis. 2005;5:94-106.
8. Amon M, Menapace R, Radax U, Freyler H. In vivo study of cell reactions on poly(methyl methacrylate) intraocular lenses with different surface properties. J Cataract Refract Surg. 1996;(22 suppl 1):825-829.
9. Amon M, Menapace R. In vivo documentation of cellular reactions on lens surfaces for assessing the biocompatibility of different intraocular implants. Eye (Lond). 1994;8(pt 6):649-656.
10. Ishihara K, Nomura H, Mihara T, et al. Why do phospholipid polymers reduce protein adsorption? J Biomed Mater Res. 1998;39:323-330. (Pubitemid 28060367)
11. Lewis AL. Phosphorylcholine-based polymers and their use in the prevention of biofouling. Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces. 2000;18:261-275.
12. Sawada S, Sakaki S, Iwasaki Y, et al. Suppression of the inflammatory response from adherent cells on phospholipid polymers. J Biomed Mater Res A. 2003;64:411-416.
13. Patel JD, Iwasaki Y, Ishihara K, et al. Phospholipid polymer surfaces reduce bacteria and leukocyte adhesion under dynamic flow conditions. J Biomed Mater Res A. 2005;73:359-366.
14. Russel JC. Bacteria, biofilms, and devices: the possible protective role of phosphorylcholine materials. J Endourol. 2000;14:39-42.
15. Court JL, Redman RP, Wang JH, et al. A novel phosphorylcholine-coated contact lens for extended wear use. Biomaterials. 2001;22:3261-3272.
16. Huang Y, Liu X, Wang L, et al. Local methylprednisolone delivery using a biodivysio phosphorylcholine-coated drug-delivery stent reduces inflammation and neointimal hyperplasia in a porcine coronary stent model. Int J Cardiovasc Intervent. 2003;5:166-171.
17. Susin C, Qahash M, Hall J, et al. Histological and biomechanical evaluation of phosphorylcholine-coated titanium implants. J Clin Periodontol. 2008;35: 270-275.
18. Henriksen TF, Fryzek JP, Hölmich LR, et al. Surgical intervention and capsular contracture after breast augmentation: a prospective study of risk factors. Ann Plast Surg. 2005;54:343-351.
19. Henriksen TF, Hölmich LR, Fryzek JP, et al. Incidence and severity of short-term complications after breast augmentation: results from a nationwide breast implant registry. Ann Plast Surg. 2003;51:531-539.
20. Poeppl N, Schreml S, Lichtenegger F, et al. Does the surface structure of implants have an impact on the formation of a capsular contracture? Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2007;31:133-139.
21. Wong CH, Samuel M, Tan BK, et al. Capsular contracture in subglandular breast augmentation with textured versus smooth breast implants: a systematic review. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2006;118:1224-1236.
22. van Heerden J, Turner M, Hoffmann D, et al. Antimicrobial coating agents: can biofilm formation on a breast implant be prevented? J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2009;62:610-617.
23. Wolfram D, Rainer C, Niederegger H, et al. Cellular and molecular composition of fibrous capsules formed around silicone breast implants with special focus on immune reactions. J Autoimmun. 2004;23:81-91.
24. Li N, Schwartz M, Ionescu-Zanetti C. PDMS compound adsorption in context. J Biomol Screen. 2009;14:194-202.
25. Richter-Mueksch S, Kahaman G, Amon M, et al. Uveal and capsular biocompatibility after implantation of sharp-edged hydrophilic acrylic, hydrophobic acrylic, and silicone intraocular lenses in eyes with pseudofixation syndrome. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2007;33:1414-1418.
26. Hezi-Yamit A, Sullivan C, Wong J, et al. Impact of polymer hydrophilicity on biocompatibility: implication for DES polymer design. J Biomed Mater Res A. 2009;90:133-141.
27. Cotran RS, Kumar V, Robbins SL. Pathologic Basis of Disease. 4th ed. Philadelphia, PA: W.B. Saunders Co. 1994:77-82.
28. Kamel M, Protzner K, Fornasier V, et al. The peri-implant breast capsule: an immunophenotypic study of capsules taken at explantation surgery. J Biomed Mater Res. 2001;58:88-96.
29. McConnell JP, Moyer TP, Nixon DE, et al. Determination of silicon in breast and capsular tissue from patients with breast implants performed by inductively coupled plasma emission spectroscopy. Comparison with tissue histology. Am J Clin Pathol. 1997;107:236-246.
30. Presterl E, Lassnigg A, Parschalk B, et al. Clinical behavior of implant infections due to Staphylococcus epidermidis. Int J Artif Organs. 2005;28: 1110-1118.
31. Sugiura S, Edahiro J, Sumaru K, et al. Surface modification of polydimethylsiloxane with photo-grafted poly(ethylene glycol) for micropatterned protein adsorption and cell adhesion. Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces. 2008;63: 301-305.
32. Huang XD, Yao K, Zhang H, et al. Surface modification of silicone intraocular lens by 2-methacryloyloxyethyl phosphoryl-choline binding to reduce Staphylococcus epidermidis adherence. Clin Experiment Ophthalmol. 2007; 35:462-467.