Phylogenetic substitution models for detecting heterotachy during plastid evolution

Molecular Biology and Evolution

Volumn 28, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 449-458

  Whelan, Simon ^a   Blackburne, Benjamin P ^a   Spencer, Matthew ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MANCHESTER   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF LIVERPOOL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

heterotachy; phylogenetics; plastid evolution; substitution models

Indexed keywords

AMINO ACID SUBSTITUTION; ARTICLE; BACTERIAL GENE; CYANOBACTERIUM; GENETIC HETEROGENEITY; GREEN ALGA; MOLECULAR EVOLUTION; MOLECULAR MODEL; NONHUMAN; PHYLOGENY; PLASTID; RED ALGA; TAXONOMY;

ALGORITHMS; BASE SEQUENCE; BIOLOGICAL EVOLUTION; CHLOROPHYTA; COMPUTER SIMULATION; GENETIC VARIATION; MODELS, GENETIC; MOLECULAR SEQUENCE DATA; PHYLOGENY; PLASTIDS; PROTEINS; RHODOPHYTA; SEQUENCE ALIGNMENT;

CYANOBACTERIA; RHODOPHYTA;

EID: 78650494526     PISSN: 07374038     EISSN: 15371719     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/molbev/msq215     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Ané C, Burleigh JG, McMahon MM, Sanderson MJ. 2005. Covarion structure in plastid genome evolution: a new statistical test. Mol Biol Evol. 22:914-924.
2. Baldauf SL, Roger AJ, Wenk-Siefert I, Doolittle WF. 2000. A kingdom-level phylogeny of eukaryotes based on combined protein data. Science 290:972-977.
3. Davison AC, Hinkley DV. 1997. Bootstrap methods and their application. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
4. Delsuc F, Brinkmann H, Philippe H. 2005. Phylogenomics and the reconstruction of the tree of life. Nat Rev Genet. 6: 361-375.
5. Dunn CW, Hejnol A, Matus DQ, et al. (18 co-authors). 2008. Broad phylogenomic sampling improves resolution of the animal tree of life. Nature 452:745-749.
6. Felsenstein J. 1978. Cases in which parsimony or compatibility methods will be positively misleading. Syst Zool. 27: 401-410.
7. Felsenstein J. 2003. Inferring phylogenies. Sunderland (MA): Sinauer Associates.
8. Galtier N. 2001. Maximum-likelihood phylogenetic analysis under a covarion-like model. Mol Biol Evol. 18:866-873.
9. Gaucher EA, Miyamoto MM, Benner SA. 2001. Function-structure analysis of proteins using covarion-based evolutionary approaches: elongation factors. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 98: 548-552.
10. Gruenheit N, Lockhart PJ, Steel M, Martin W. 2008. Difficulties in testing for covarion-like properties of sequences under the confounding influence of changing proportions of variable sites. Mol Biol Evol. 25:1512-1520.
11. Huelsenbeck JP. 2002. Testing a covariotide model of DNA substitution. Mol Biol Evol. 19:698-707.
12. Huson DH, Richter DC, Rausch C, Dezulian T, Franz M, Rupp R. 2007. Dendroscope: an interactive viewer for large phylogenetic trees. BMC Bioinformatics. 8:460.
13. Inagaki Y, Nakajima Y, Sato M, Sakaguchi M, Hashimoto T. 2009. Gene sampling can bias multi-gene phylogenetic inferences: the relationship between red algae and green plants as a case study. Mol Biol Evol. 26:1171-1178.
14. Inagaki Y, Susko E, Fast NM, Roger AJ. 2004. Covarion shifts cause a long-branch attraction artifact that unites microsporidia and archaebacteria in EF-1 alpha phylogenies. Mol Biol Evol. 21:1340-1349.
15. Kolaczkowski B, Thornton JW. 2004. Performance of maximum parsimony and likelihood phylogenetics when evolution is heterogeneous. Nature 431:980-984.
16. Kolaczkowski B, Thornton JW. 2008. A mixed branch length model of heterotachy improves phylogenetic accuracy. Mol Biol Evol. 25:1054-1066.
17. Lockhart P, Novis P, Milligan BG, Riden J, Rambaut A, Larkum T. 2006. Heterotachy and tree building: a case study with plastids and eubacteria. Mol Biol Evol. 23:40-45.
18. Lockhart P, Steel M. 2005. A tale of two processes. Syst Biol. 54:948-951.
19. Lopez P, Casane D, Philippe H. 2002. Heterotachy, an important process of protein evolution. Mol Biol Evol. 19:1-7.
20. Martin W, Stoebe B, Goremykin V, Hansmann S, Hasegawa M, Kowallik KV. 1998. Gene transfer to the nucleus and the evolution of chloroplasts. Nature 393:162-165.
21. Matsen FA, Steel M. 2007. Phylogenetic mixtures on a single tree can mimic a tree of another topology. Syst Biol. 56:767-775.
22. Philippe H, Casane D, Gribaldo S, Lopez P, Meunier J. 2003. Heterotachy and functional shift in protein evolution. IUBMB Life. 55:257-265.
23. Philippe H, Germot A. 2000. Phylogeny of eukaryotes based on ribosomal RNA: long-branch attraction and models of sequence evolution. Mol Biol Evol. 17:830-834.
24. Philippe H, Zhou Y, Brinkmann H, Rodrigue N, Delsuc F. 2005. Heterotachy and long-branch attraction in phylogenetics. BMC Evol Biol. 5:50.
25. Rambaut A, Posada D, Crandall KA, Holmes EC. 2004. The causes and consequences of HIV evolution. Nat Rev Genet. 5:52-61.
26. Rogers JS. 1997. On the consistency of maximum likelihood estimation of phylogenetic trees from nucleotide sequences. Syst Biol. 46:354-357.
27. Shavit Grievink L, Penny D, Hendy MD, Holland BR. 2008. LineageSpecificSeqgen: generating sequence data with lineage-specific variation in the proportion of variable sites. BMC Evol Biol. 8:317.[Erratum in BMC Evol Biol 9, 2009].
28. Simon C, Nigro L, Sullivan J, Holsinger K, Martin A, Grapputo A, Franke A, McIntosh C. 1996. Large differences in substitutional pattern and evolutionary rate of 12S ribosomal RNA genes. Mol Biol Evol. 13:923-932.
29. Torroni A, Achilli A, Macaulay V, Richards M, Bandelt HJ. 2006. Harvesting the fruit of the human mtDNA tree. Trends Genet. 22:339-345.
30. Tuffley C, Steel M. 1998. Modeling the covarion hypothesis of nucleotide substitution. Math Biosci. 147:63-91.
31. Wang HC, Spencer M, Susko E, Roger AJ. 2007. Testing for covarion-like evolution in protein sequences. Mol Biol Evol. 24:294-305.
32. Whelan S. 2007. New approaches to phylogenetic tree search and their application to large numbers of protein alignments. Syst Biol. 56:727-740.
33. Whelan S. 2008a. Inferring Trees. In: Keith J, editor. Bioinformatics: Data, Sequence Analysis and Evolution. Totowa (NJ): Humana Press. p. 287-309.
34. Whelan S. 2008b. Spatial and temporal heterogeneity in nucleotide sequence evolution. Mol Biol Evol. 25:1683-1694.
35. Whelan S. 2008c. The genetic code can cause systematic bias in simple phylogenetic models. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 363:4003-4011.
36. Whelan S, Goldman N. 2001. A general empirical model of protein evolution derived from multiple protein families using a maximum-likelihood approach. Mol Biol Evol. 18:691-699.
37. Yang ZH. 1994. Maximum-likelihood phylogenetic estimation from DNA-sequences with variable rates over sites-approximate methods. J Mol Evol. 39:306-314.