A case study in integrating multiple e-commerce standards via semantic web technology

Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)

Volumn 5823 LNCS, Issue , 2009, Pages 909-924

  Yu, Yang ^a   Hillman, Donald ^a   Setio, Basuki ^a   Heflin, Jeff ^a  

^a Lehigh University   (United States)

Author keywords

E commerce; Ontology integration

Indexed keywords

ELECTRONIC COMMERCE; INVENTORY CONTROL; MAPPING; ONTOLOGY;

BUSINESS-TO-BUSINESS TRANSACTIONS; CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM; FORMAL DEFINITION; INTERACTIVE INTERFACES; LOGICAL RELATIONSHIPS; ONTOLOGY INTEGRATION; SEMANTIC WEB TECHNOLOGY; US DEFENSE;

SEMANTIC WEB;

EID: 78650479952     PISSN: 03029743     EISSN: 16113349     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-04930-9_57     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (16)

1. Berners-Lee, T., Hendler, J., Lassila, O.: The Semantic Web. Scientific American 284, 34-43 (2001).
2. Bizer, C., Wolk, J.: RDF Version of the eClass 4.1 Product Classification Schema (retrieved June 2009), http://www.wiwiss.fu-berlin.de/suhl/bizer/ ecommerce/eClass-4.1.rdf.
3. Bowers, S., Delcambre, L.: Representing and Transforming Model-Based Information. In: Proceedings of the Workshop on the Semantic Web at ECDL 2000, Lisbon, Portugal, September 21 (2000).
4. Choi, N., Song, I.-Y., Han, H.: A Survey on Ontology Mapping Sigmod Record. ACM SIGMOD Record archive 35(3) (2006).
5. Corcho, O., Gomez-Perez, A.: Solving Integration Problems of Ecommerce Standards and Initiatives through Ontological Mappings. In: IJCAI 2001 Workshop on Ontologies and Information Sharing, pp. 131-140 (2001).
6. Fensel, D., McGuinness, D.L., Schulten, E., Ng, W.K., Lim, E.-P., Yan, G.: Ontologies and Electronic Commerce. IEEE Intelligent Systems 16(1), 8-14 (2001).
7. Guarino, N.: Formal Ontology in Information Systems. In: Proceedings of FOIS 1998, Trento, Italy, pp. 3-15. IOS Press, Amsterdam (1998).
8. Heflin, J., Hendler, J.: Dynamic Ontologies on the Web. In: Proceedings of the Seventeenth National Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI 2000), pp. 443-449. AAAI/MIT Press (2000).
9. Hepp, M.: Products and Services Ontologies: A Methodology for Deriving OWL Ontologies from Industrial Categorization Standards. Int'l Journal on Semantic Web & Information Systems (IJSWIS) 2(1), 72-99 (2006).
10. Klein, M.: DAML+OIL and RDF Schema representation of UNSPSC (retrieved June 4, 2009), http://www.cs.vu.nl/~mcaklein/unspsc/.
11. McGuinness, D., Fikes, R., Rice, J., Wilder, S.: An Environment for Merging and Testing Large Ontologies. In: Proceedings of the Seventh International Conference on Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning (KR 2000), Breckenridge, Colorado, pp. 12-15 (April 2000).
12. McGuinness, D.L.: UNSPSC Ontology in DAML+OIL (retrieved from June 4, 2009) http://www.ksl.stanford.edu/projects/DAML/UNSPSC.daml.
13. Noy, N., Musen, M.: PROMPT: Algorithm and Tool for Automated Ontology Merging and Alignment. In: Proceedings of the AAAI 2000 Conference, Austin, TX (2000).
14. Omelayenko, B.: Syntactic-Level Ontology Integration Rules for E-Commerce. In: FLAIRS Conference 2001, pp. 324-328 (2001).
15. Pierra, G.: Context-explication in conceptual ontologies: The PLIB approach. In: Proceedings of 10th ISPE International Conference on Concurrent Engineering: Research and Applications (ce 2003): Special Track on Data Integration in Engineering, pp. 243-254 (2003).
16. Tobies, S.: The complexity of reasoning with cardinality restrictions and nominals in expressive Description Logics. J. of Artificial Intelligence Research (JAIR) 12, 199-217 (2000).