Item response modeling of paired comparison and ranking data

Multivariate Behavioral Research

Volumn 45, Issue 6, 2010, Pages 935-974

  Maydeu Olivares, Alberto ^a   Brown, Anna ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BARCELONA   (Spain)

^b SHL Group   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 78650469783     PISSN: 00273171     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/00273171.2010.531231     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Bock, R. D. (1997). The nominal categories model. In W. J. van der Linden & R. K. Hambleton (Eds.), Handbook of modern item response theory (pp. 33-49). New York: Springer Verlag.
2. Bock, R. D., & Aitkin, M. (1981). Marginal maximum likelihood estimation of item parameters: Application of an EM algorithm. Psychometrika, 46, 443-459.
3. Bock, R. D., & Jones, L. V. (1968). The measurement and prediction of judgment and choice. San Francisco: Holden-Day.
4. Böckenholt, U. (2004). Comparative judgments as an alternative to ratings: Identifying the scale origin. Psychological Methods, 9, 453-465.
5. Brown, A., & Maydeu-Olivares, A. (2009, July). Improving forced-choice tests with IRT. Paper presented at the 16th international meeting of the Psychometric Society, Cambridge, UK.
6. Brown, A., & Maydeu-Olivares, A. (in press). Item response modeling of forced-choice questionnaires. Educational and Psychological Measurement.
7. Cheung, M. W. L., & Chan, W. (2002). Reducing uniform response bias with ipsative measurement in multiple-group confirmatory factor analysis. Structural Equation Modeling, 9, 55-77.
8. du Toit, M. (Ed.). (2003). IRT from SSI. Chicago: SSI Scientific Software International.
9. Elosua, P. (2007). Assessing vocational interests in the Basque Country using paired comparison design. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 71, 135-145.
10. Forero, C. G., & Maydeu-Olivares, A. (2009). Estimation of IRT graded models for rating data: Limited vs. full information methods. Psychological Methods, 14, 275-299.
11. Forero, C. G., Maydeu-Olivares, A., & Gallardo-Pujol, D. (2009). Factor analysis with ordinal indicators: A Monte Carlo study comparing DWLS and ULS estimation. Structural Equation Modeling, 16, 625-641.
12. Hogan, R. (1983). A socioanalytic theory of personality. In M. M. Page (Ed.), Nebraska symposium on motivation 1982. Personality: Current theory and research (pp. 55-89). Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.
13. Holland, J. L. (1997). Making vocational choices: A theory of vocational personalities and work environments (3rd ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
14. Maydeu-Olivares, A. (1999). Thurstonian modeling of ranking data via mean and covariance structure analysis. Psychometrika, 64, 325-340.
15. Maydeu-Olivares, A. (2001). Limited information estimation and testing of Thurstonian models for paired comparison data under multiple judgment sampling. Psychometrika, 66, 209-228.
16. Maydeu-Olivares, A. (2002). Limited information estimation and testing of Thurstonian models for preference data. Mathematical Social Sciences, 43, 467-483.
17. Maydeu-Olivares, A., & Böckenholt, U. (2005). Structural equation modeling of paired comparisons and ranking data. Psychological Methods, 10, 285-304.
18. Maydeu-Olivares, A., & Coffman, D. L. (2006). Randomintercept item factor analysis. Psychological Methods, 11, 344-362.
19. Maydeu-Olivares, A., & Hernández, A. (2007). Identification and small sample estimation of Thurstone's unrestricted model for paired comparisons data. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 42, 323-347.
20. McDonald, R. P. (1999). Test theory: A unified approach. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
21. Murphy, K. R., Jako, R. A., & Anhalt, R. L. (1993). Nature and consequences of halo error: A critical analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78, 218-225.
22. Muthén, B. (1993). Goodness of fit with categorical and other nonnormal variables. In K. A. Bollen & J. S. Long (Eds.), Testing structural equations models (pp. 205-234). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
23. Muthén, B., du Toit, S. H. C., & Spisic, D. (1997). Robust inference using weighted least squares and quadratic estimating equations in latent variable modeling with categorical and continuous outcomes. Unpublished manuscript, University of California, Los Angeles.
24. Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. (1998-2009). Mplus 5. Los Angeles: Author.
25. Reckase, M. (2009). Multidimensional item response theory. New York: Springer.
26. Rounds, J., & Tracey, T. J. (1993). Prediger's dimensional representation of Holland's RIASEC circumplex. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78, 875-890.
27. Schuerger, J. M. (2001). 16PF-APQ manual. Champaign, IL: Institute for Personality and Ability Testing.
28. Takane, Y. (1987). Analysis of covariance structures and probabilistic binary choice data. Communication and Cognition, 20, 45-62.
29. Takane, Y., & de Leeuw, J. (1987). On the relationship between item response theory and factor analysis of discretized variables. Psychometrika, 52, 393-408.
30. Thurstone, L. L. (1927). A law of comparative judgment. Psychological Review, 79, 281-299.
31. Thurstone, L. L. (1931). Rank order as a psychologicalmethod. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 14, 187-201.
32. Tsai, R. C., & Böckenholt, U. (2001). Maximum likelihood estimation of factor and ideal point models for paired comparison data. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 45, 795-811.
33. Van Herk, H., Poortinga, Y., & Verhallen, T. (2004). Response styles in rating scales: Evidence of method bias in data from six EU countries. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 35, 346.
34. Warr, P. (2007). Work, happiness, and unhappiness. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
35. Yang, M., Inceoglu, I., & Silvester, J. (2010, January). Exploring ways of measuring person-job fit to predict engagement. Paper presented at the BPS Division of Occupational Psychology conference, Brighton, UK.
36. Tsai, R. C. (2003). Remarks on the identifiability of Thurstonian paired comparison models under multiple judgment. Psychometrika, 68, 361-372.