Evaluation of linear and nonlinear convection schemes on multidimensional non-orthogonal grids with applications to KVLCC2 tanker

International Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids

Volumn 64, Issue 8, 2010, Pages 850-886

  Ismail, Farzad ^a   Carrica, Pablo M ^b   Xing, Tao ^c   Stern, Frederick ^b  

^a SCHOOL OF PHYSICS   (Malaysia)

^b UNIVERSITY OF IOWA   (United States)

^c TUSKEGEE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Best practices; Convection schemes; DES; Integral forces and moments; Isotropic and anisotropic turbulence modeling; Local flow quantities

Indexed keywords

ANISOTROPIC TURBULENCE; BEST-PRACTICES; CONVECTION SCHEMES; DES; INTEGRAL FORCES AND MOMENTS; LOCAL FLOWS;

ANISOTROPY; ASPECT RATIO; COMPUTER SIMULATION; FLUID DYNAMICS; FORECASTING; INDUSTRIAL APPLICATIONS; MANAGEMENT; RATING; TANKERS (SHIPS); TURBULENCE MODELS; TURBULENT FLOW;

COMPUTATIONAL FLUID DYNAMICS;

EID: 78650451941     PISSN: 02712091     EISSN: 10970363     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/fld.2174     Document Type: Article

References (53)

1. Carrica PM, Wilson RV, Stern F. An unsteady single-phase level set method for viscous free surface flows. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids 2007; 53:229-256.
2. Rhee SH, Skinner C. Unstructured grid based Navier-Stokes solver for free-surface flow around surface ships. Proceedings of CFD Workshop. National Maritime Research Institute: Tokyo, Japan, 2005; 448-453.
3. Di Mascio A, Broglia R, Muscari R. On the application of single-phase level set method for naval hydrodynamics. Computers and Fluids 2007; 36:868-886.
4. Carrica PM, Wilson RV, Stern F. Unsteady RANS simulation of the ship forward speed diffraction problem. Computers and Fluids 2006; 35:545-570.
5. Carrica PM, Wilson RV, Stern F. Ship motions using single-phase level set with dynamic overset grids. Computers and Fluids 2007; 36:1415-1433.
6. Carrica PM, Ismail F, Hyman M, Bhushan S, Stern F. Turn and zigzag maneuvers of a surface combatant using a URANS approach with dynamic overset grids. Proceedings of SIMMAN 2008 CFD Workshop, Copenhagen, Denmark, 2008.
7. Lax PD. Weak solutions of nonlinear hyperbolic equations and their numerical computation. Communications in Pure and Applied Mathematics 1954; 7:159-193.
8. Lax PD, Wendroff B. System of conservation laws. Communications in Pure and Applied Mathematics 1960; 13:217-242.
9. Gaskell PH, Lau AKC. Curvature compensated convective transport: SMART, a new boundedness-preserving transport algorithm. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids 1988; 8:617-641.
10. Waterson NP, Deconinck H. Design principles for bounded higher order convections schemes-a unified approach. Journal of Computational Physics 2007; 224:182-207.
11. Leonard BP, Mokhtari S. Ultra-sharp nonoscillatory convection schemes for high speed steady multidimensional flow. NASA TM-102568, Lewis Research Center, 1990.
12. Tamamidis P, Assanis DN. Evaluation of various high order accuracy schemes with and without flux limiters. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids 1993; 16:931-948.
13. Van Leer B. Toward the ultimate conservative difference scheme IV. A new approach to numerical convection. Journal of Computational Physics 1977; 23:276-299.
14. Godunov SK. Finite difference method for numerical computation of discontinuous solutions of the equations of fluid dynamics. Matematicheskii Sbornik 1959; 47:271-306.
15. Boris B, Book DL. Flux corrected transport I, SHASTA a fluid transport algorithm that works. Journal of Computational Physics 1973; 11:38-69.
16. Van Leer B. Toward the ultimate conservative difference scheme V. A second order sequel to Godunov's method. Journal of Computational Physics 1979; 32:101-136.
17. Harten A. High resolution schemes for hyperbolic conservation laws. Journal of Computational Physics 1983; 49:357-393.
18. Leonard BP. The ULTIMATE conservative difference scheme applied to unsteady one dimensional advection. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering 1991; 88:17-74.
19. Jasak H, Weller HG, Gosman AD. High resolution NVD differencing scheme for arbitrarily unstructured meshes. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids 1999; 31:431-449.
20. Van SH, Yim GT, Kim WJ, Kim DH, Yoon HS, Eom JY. Measurement of flows around 3600 TEU container ship model. Proceedings of Annual Autumn Meetings, Korea, 1997; 300-304.
21. Van SH, Kim WJ, Kim DH, Yim GT, Lee CJ, Eom JY. Flow measurement around a 300 K VLCC model. Proceedings of Annual Spring Meetings, Korea, 1998; 185-188.
22. Van SH, Kim WJ, Yim GT, Kim DH, Lee CJ. Experimental investigation of the flow characteristics around practical hull forms. Proceedings of the 3rd Osaka Colloqium on Advanced CFD Applications to Ship Flow and Hull Form Design, Japan, 1998.
23. Kim WJ, Van SH, Kim DH. Measurement of flows around modern commercial ship models. Experiments in Fluids 2001; 31:567-578.
24. Kume K, Hasegawa J, Tsukada Y, Fujisawa J, Fukasawa R, Hinatsu M. Measurements of hydrodynamic forces, surface pressure, and wake for obliquely towed tanker model and uncertainty analysis for CFD validation. Journal of Marine Science and Technology 2006; 11:65-75.
25. Lee SJ, Kim HR, Kim WJ, Van SH. Wind tunnel Tests on flow characteristics of the KRISO 3600 TEU containership and 300K VLCC double-deck ship models. Journal of Ship Research 2003; 47:24-38.
26. Kim WJ, Kim DH, Van SH. Computational study on turbulent flows around modern tanker hull forms. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids 2002; 38:377-406.
27. Larsson L, Stern F, Bertram V. Benchmarking of computational fluid dynamics for ship flows: the Gothenburg 2000 workshop. Journal of Ship Research Fluids 2003; 47:63-81.
28. Gorski JJ, Coleman RM. Computations of the KVLCC2M tanker under yawed conditions. Proceedings of CFD Workshop, Tokyo, 2005; 569-574.
29. Bull PW. Verification and validation of KVLCC2M tanker flow. Proceedings of CFD Workshop, Tokyo, 2005; 581-586.
30. Simonsen CD, Stern F, Agdrup K. CFD and PMM test validation for maneuvering VLCC2 tanker in deep and shallow water. MARSIM 2006, Terchelling, The Netherlands, 2006.
31. Xing T, Shao J, Stern F. BKW-RS-DES of unsteady vertical flow for KVLCC2 at large drift angles. Ninth International Conference on Numerical Ship Hydrodynamics, Ann Arbor, MI, 2007.
32. Turnock SR, Phillips AB, Furlong M. URANS simulations of static drift and dynamic maneuvers of the KVLCC2 tanker. Proceedings of SIMMAN Workshop, Copenhagen, 2008.
33. Hino T. CFD Workshop 2005. Proceedings of the CFD Workshop, Tokyo, 2005.
34. Gorski JJ, Coleman RM. Computations of the KVLCC2M tanker under yawed conditions. Proceedings of the CFD Workshop, Tokyo, 2005; 569-574.
35. Pattenden RJ, Turnock SR, Pashias C. Oblique ship flow predictions using identification of vortex centers to control mesh adaption. Proceedings of the CFD Workshop, Tokyo, 2005; 510-515.
36. Bensow RE, Fureby C, Liefvendahl M, Persson T. A comparative study of RANS, DES and LES. Twenty-sixth Symposium on Naval Hydrodynamics, Rome, Italy, 2006.
37. Di Mascio A, Broglia R, Muscari R. Prediction of hydrodynamic coefficients of ship hulls by high order Godunov-type methods. Journal of Marine Science and Technology 2008; 14:19-29.
38. Spalart PR, Allmaras SR. A one-equation turbulence model for aerodynamic flows. AIAA Conference Paper 1992-439, 1992.
39. Menter FR. Two-equation eddy viscosity turbulence models for engineering applications. AIAA Journal 1994; 32:1598-1605.
40. Wallin S, Johansson A. An explicit algebraic Reynolds stress model for incompressible and compressible turbulent flows. Journal of Fluid Mechanics 2000; 403:89-132.
41. Travin A, Shur M, Strelets M. Physical and numerical upgrades in detached eddy simulation of complex turbulent flows. Advances in LES Complex Flows. Springer: Munich, Germany, 2002; 239-254.
42. Stern F, Wilson RV, Shao J. Quantitative approach to V&V of CFD simulations and certifications of CFD codes. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids 2006; 50:1335-1355.
43. Xing T, Stern F. Factor of safety for Richardson extrapolation for industrial applications. IIHR Report No. 466, September 2008; 1-11.
44. Coleman HW, Stern F. Uncertainties and CFD code validation. Journal of Fluids Engineering 1997; 119:795-803.
45. Hedges LS, Travin AK, Spalart PR. Detached-Eddy simulations over a simplified landing gear. Journal of Fluids Engineering 2002; 124:413-423.
46. Sweby P. High resolution schemes using flux limiters for hyperbolic conservation laws. SIAM Journal on Numerical Analysis 1984; 21:995-1011.
47. Issa RI. Solution of the implicitly discretized fluid flow equations by operator splitting. Journal of Computational Physics 1985; 62:40-65.
48. Balay S, Buschelman K, Gropp W, Kaushik D, Knepley M et al. PETSc user manual. ANL-95/11 Rev. 21.5, Argonne National Laboratory, 2002.
49. Noack R. SUGGAR: a general capability for moving body overset grid assembly. Seventeenth AIAA CFD Conference, 2005-5117, Toronto, 2005.
50. Ismail F, Roe PL. Toward a vorticity-preserving second order finite volume scheme solving the Euler equation. 17th AIAA CFD Conference, 2005-5235, Toronto, 2005.
51. Lerat A, Falissard F, Sides J. Vorticity-preserving schemes for compressible Euler equations. Journal of Computational Physics 2007; 225:635-651.
52. Hunt JCR, Wray AA, Moin P. Eddies, stream, and convergence zones in turbulent flows. Report CTR-S88, Center for Turbulence Research, 1988.
53. Orlins JJ, Gulliver JS. Measurements of free surface turbulence. Fourth International Symposium on Gas Transfer at Water Surfaces, FL, 2000.