Trends in the comparative study of public administration

International Review of Administrative Sciences

Volumn 76, Issue 4, 2010, Pages 750-760

[No Author Info available]

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPARATIVE STUDY; PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION; TREND ANALYSIS;

EID: 78650442038     PISSN: 00208523     EISSN: 14617226     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0020852310386437     Document Type: Article

References (74)

1. New York: Harper, 1880
2. Woodrow Wilson (1887) The study of administration. Political Science Quarterly II(June): 197-222.
3. Leonard D. White (ed.) (1935) Civil Service Abroad, New York: McGraw-Hill and (1930) The Civil Service in the Modern State. Chicago.
4. Don K. Price (1951) The New Dimension of Diplomacy. New York: Woodrow Wilson Foundation
5. Rowland A. Egger (1949) An American administrative class. In: Joseph E. McLean (ed.) The Public Service and University Education. Princeton, NJ, 205-233
6. See also Paul Van Riper (1958) The senior civil service and the career system Public Administration Review XVIII(Summer): 189-198.
7. Public Administration in India, Report of a Survey. Delhi: Manager of Publications, 1953
8. Other examples include: Lyman S. Moore and Edmond F. Richetts (1952) A Program for Strengthening Public Administration in the Kingdom of Thailand. Washington: MSA.
9. William C. Coleman (1949) Civil service reform in Greece. Public Personnel Review X: 86-93
10. James D. Kitchen (1950) National personnel administration in Uruguay. Inter-American Economic Affairs III: 45-58
11. O.E. Ault (1953) Report on Training of the Civil Service of Israel. New York: United Nations, Sales No. 1953.II.H.7.
12. John O. Hall (1954) La Administration Publica en el Uruguay. Montevideo.
13. John H. Romani (1954) The Office of the Philippine President. Manila: IPA
14. Enrique Tejera-Paris (1956) Observations on personnel management in Latin America. Public Personnel Review XVII: 295-301.
15. Joesph B. Kingsbury (1955) In-service training in Turkey. Personnel Administration XVIII(March): 12-16, 28.
16. A good many such reports have been classified as confidential documents and hence are not available for scholarly research. The reports of the International Bank missions in many countries include, with their economic data, many comments on administrative practices together with recommendations for reform. The same is true of the Bell mission report: Economic Survey Mission to the Philippines (1950) Report to the President of the United States. Washington, DC.
17. Standards and Techniques of Public Administration with special reference to technical assistance for underdeveloped countries. New York United Nations, 1951, Sales No. 1951.11.B.7. The IIAS reports include
18. Arnold Miles and Alan L. Dean (1950) Issues and Problems in the Administrative Organisations of National Governments
19. Brussels. IIAS (1951) National Administration and International Organization: A Comparative Study of 14 Countries.
20. Brussels. Roger Gregoire (1955) National Administration and International Organizations. Brussels.
21. Thomas D. Kingdom (1951) Improvement of Organization and Management in Public Administration: A Comparative Study. Brussels.
22. Some examples include: Frederick C. King (ed.) (1944-1954) Public Administration in Ireland, 3 vols. Dublin. Indian
23. Institute of Public Administration (1958) The Organization of the Government of India. Asia Publishing House.
24. George Grassmuck and Kamal Salibi (1956) A Manual of Lebanese Administration. Beirut: American University.
25. Albert Gorvine and Laurence L. Barber, Jr (1957) Organization and Functions of Turkish Ministries.
26. Ankara Edwin O. Stene and Associates (1955) Public Administration in the Philippines. Manila: IPA. H.B.
27. Jacobini and Associates (1956) Governmental Services in 758 International Review of Administrative Sciences 76(4) the Philippines. Manila: IPA.
28. National Institute of Administration (1958) Viet-Nam Government Organization Manual 1957-1958.
29. Saigon. William E.H. Howard (1956) Public Administration in Ethiopia. Groningen and New York.
30. Sir Charles Collins (1952) Public Administration in Hong Kong. London.
31. F.S.V. Donnison (1953) Public Administration in Burna. London
32. Stanley W. Jones (1951) Public Administration in Siam. London
33. Sir Charles Collins (1951) Public Administration in Ceylon. London.
34. Walter R. Sarp (1931) The French Civil Service: Bureaucracy in Transition. New York: Macmillan.
35. Carl J. Friedrich and Taylor Cole (1932) Responsible Bureaucracy: A Study of the Swiss Civil Service. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
36. J. Donald Kingsley (1944) Representative Bureaucracy: An Interpretation of the British Civil Service. Yellow Springs, OH: Antioch.
37. Leslie Lipson (1948) The Politics of Equality: New Zealand's Adventures in Democracy. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
38. Taylor Cole (1949) The Canadian Bureaucracy. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
39. Marver Bernstein (1957) The Politics of Israel. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
40. Howard Scarrow (1957) The Higher Public Service of the Commonwealth of Australia. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
41. Examples are: R.A.Kelsall (1955) Higher Civil Servants in Britain, from 1870 to the Present Day. London
42. Routledge & Kegan Paul Roger Gréoire (1954) La Fonction Publique. Paris: Armand Colin.
43. Morroes Berger (1957) Bureaucracy and Society in Modern Egypt. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
44. Peter Blau (1955) The Dynamics of Bureaucracy. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press
45. Reinhard Bendix (1949) Higher Civil Servants in American Society. Boulder, CO: University of Colorado Press.
46. Philip Selznick (1949) TVA and the Grass Roots. Berkeley: University of California Press.
47. Leonard D. White (1948, 1951, 1954, and 1958) The Federalists; The Jeffersonians; The Jacksonians; and The Republican Era. New York: Macmillan.
48. Arthur Blunt (1937) The Indian Civil Service. London: Faber & Faber.
49. L.S.S. O'Malley (1931) The Indian Civil Service, 1601-1930. London: J. Murray.
50. H.W. Kunzru (1917) The Public Services in India. Allahabad.
51. R. Dwarkadas (1958) Role of the Higher Civil Service in India. Bombay: Popular Book Depot.
52. O.D. Corpuz (1957) The Bureaucracy in the Philippines. Manila: IPA.
53. E.A. Kracke, Jr (1953) Civil Service in Early Sung China, 960-1067. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
54. José Abueva (1959) Focus on the Barrio. Manila: IPA. See also John D. Montgomery and the NIA Case
55. Development Seminar (1959) Cases in Vietnamese Administration. Saignon.
56. Finer A (1950) Theory and Practice of Modern Government (rev. edn). New York: Holt.
57. Friedrich A (1950) Constitutional Government and Democracy (rev. edn). Boston: Ginn.
58. New York: Macmillan (1959).
59. New York: Praeger (1959).
60. Chinese influence on the western examination system. Harvard Journal of Asiatic Studies 7: 267-312 (1943).
61. Paul Van Riper has extended this analysis to the American civil service in his essay: Adapting a British political invention to American needs. Public Administration (London) XXI: 317-330 (1953)
62. See also his A History of the United States Civil Service. Evanston, IL
63. Row, Peterson (1958). Riggs 759
64. Kingship. London: Oxford University Press, 1927
65. Kings and Councillors. London: Luzuac, 1936.
66. Caste: A Comparative Study. London, 1950.
67. Patronage and the public service: Jeffersonian bureaucracy and British tradition. Public Administration XXX: 329-360 (1952).
68. Robert A. Dahl (1947) The science of public administration: Three problems. Public Administration Review VII: 1-11.
69. For its relevance to total societies, see particularly Marion J. Levy (1952) The Structure of Society. Princeton, NJ.
70. Glencoe, IL: Free Press (1958).
71. See especially, Nationalism and Social Communication. New York: Wiley (1953).
72. Gabriel Almond and James Coleman (1960) Politics in Developing Areas. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
73. John Gaus (1947) Reflections on Public Administration. University: University of Alabama Press.
74. See, for example, Fritz Morstein Marx (1957) The Administrative State. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.