Actively learning ontology matching via user interaction

Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)

Volumn 5823 LNCS, Issue , 2009, Pages 585-600

  Shi, Feng ^a   Li, Juanzi ^a   Tang, Jie ^a   Xie, Guotong ^b   Li, Hanyu ^b  

^a TSINGHUA UNIVERSITY   (China)

^b IBM CHINA RESEARCH LAB   (China)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

INTEROPERABILITY; SEMANTIC WEB;

AUTOMATIC ALGORITHMS; HETEROGENEOUS ONTOLOGY; INTERACTIVE INTERFACES; INTERACTIVE PROCESS; ONTOLOGY MATCHING; PROPAGATION ALGORITHM; SEMANTIC INTEROPERABILITY; USER'S FEEDBACKS;

ONTOLOGY;

EID: 78650436392     PISSN: 03029743     EISSN: 16113349     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-04930-9_37     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (28)

1. Oaei directory download site (2005), http://oaei.ontologymatching.org/ 2005/.
2. Ontology alignment evaluation initiative, http://oaei.ontologymatching. org/.
3. Baily, T., Jain, A.K.: A note on distance-weighted k-nearest neighbor rules. IEEE Transaction System Man Cybern 8(4), 311-313 (1978).
4. Budanitsky, A., Hirst, G.: Evaluating wordnet based measures of lexical semantic relatedness. Computational Linguistics 32(1), 13-47 (2006).
5. Chai, X., Sayyadian, M., Doan, A., Rosenthal, A., Seligman, L.: Analyzing and revising mediated schemas to improve their matchability. In: Proceedings of the VLDB Conference 2008 (2008).
6. Chalupsky, H.: Ontomorph: A translation system for symbolic knowledge. In: Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning, pp. 471-482 (2000).
7. Cohen, W., Ravikumar, P., Fienberg, S.: A comparison of string metrics for matching names and records. In: Proceedings of the IJCAI 2003 Workshop on Information Integration on the Web, pp. 73-78 (2003).
8. Doan, A., Madhavan, J., Domingos, P., Halevy, A.: Ontology matching: A machine learning approach. Springer, Heidelberg (2003).
9. Ehrig, M., Staab, S., Sure, Y.: Bootstrapping ontology alignment methods with APFEL. In: Gil, Y., Motta, E., Benjamins, V.R., Musen, M.A. (eds.) ISWC 2005. LNCS, vol. 3729, pp. 186-200. Springer, Heidelberg (2005).
10. Euzenat, J., Shvaiko, P.: Ontology Matching. Springer, Heidelberg (2007).
11. Fedorov, V.: Theory of Optimal Experiments. Academic Press, London (1972).
12. Gligorov, R., Aleksovski, Z., Kate, W., Harmelen, F.: Using google distance to weight approximate ontology matches. In: Proceedings of the 16th International World Wide Web Conference (WWW), pp. 767-776 (2007).
13. Gusfield, D.: Algorithms on strings, trees, and sequences. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1997).
14. Kapoor, A., Horvitz, E., Basu, S.: Selective supervision: Guiding supervised learning with decision-theoretic active learning. In: Proceedings of the IJCAI Conference 2007, pp. 877-882 (2007).
15. Lee, M., Yang, L., Hsu, W., Yang, X.: Xclust: Clustering xml schemas for effective integration. In: Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management (CIKM), pp. 292-299 (2002).
16. Li, Y., Zhong, Q., Li, J., Tang, J.: Result of ontology alignment with rimom at oaei07. OM, 1 (2007).
17. McGuinness, D., Fikes, R., Rice, J., Wilder, S.: The chimaera ontology environment. In: Proceedings of the 17th National Conference on Articial Intelligence (AAAI), pp. 1123-1124 (2000).
18. Melnik, S., Garcia-Molina, H., Rahm, E.: Similarity flooding: A versatile graph matching algorithm and its application to schema matching. In: Proceedings of 18th International Conference of Data Engineering (ICDE), pp. 117-128 (2002).
19. Mitra, P., Wiederhold, G., Jannink, J.: Semi-automatic integration of knowledge sources. In: Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference On Information FUSION (1999).
20. Muslea, I.: Active learning with multiple views. PhD thesis, Department of Computer Science, University of Southern California (2002).
21. Noy, N., Musen, M.: Prompt: Algorithm and tool for automated ontology merging and alignment. In: Proceedings of the National Conference on Articial Intelligence (AAAI), pp. 450-455 (2000).
22. Salton, G., Buckley, C.: Term-weighting approaches in automatic text retrieval. In: Information Processing and Management, pp. 513-523 (1988).
23. Sarawagi, S., Bhamidipaty, A.: Interactive deduplication using active learning. In: Proceedings of the 8th ACM SIGKDD international conference on Knowledge discovery and data mining, pp. 269-278 (2002).
24. Shvaiko, P., Euzenat, J.: Ten challenges for ontology matching. In: On the Move to Meaningful Internet Systems, OTM (2008).
25. Tan, P., Steinbach, M., Kumar, V.: Introduction to Data Mining (2005).
26. Tang, J., Li, J., Liang, B., Huang, X., Li, Y., Wang, K.: Using bayesian decision for ontology mapping. Web Semantics 4(4), 243-262 (2006).
27. Udrea, O., Getoor, L., Miller, R.J.: Leveraging data and structure in ontology integration. In: Proceedings of the 26th International Conference on Management of Data (SIGMOD 2007), pp. 449-460 (2007).
28. Wang, S., Englebienne, G., Schlobach, S.: Learning concept mappings from instance similarity. In: Sheth, A.P., Staab, S., Dean, M., Paolucci, M., Maynard, D., Finin, T., Thirunarayan, K. (eds.) ISWC 2008. LNCS, vol. 5318, pp. 339-355. Springer, Heidelberg (2008).