Automatic bone removal dual-energy CT angiography for the evaluation of intracranial aneurysms

Journal of Computer Assisted Tomography

Volumn 34, Issue 6, 2010, Pages 816-824

  Zhang, Long Jiang ^a   Wu, Sheng Yong ^b   Poon, Colin S ^c   Zhao, Yan E ^a   Chai, Xue ^a,d   Zhou, Chang Sheng ^a   Lu, Guang Ming ^a  

^a NANJING UNIVERSITY   (China)

^b Medical Imaging Institute of Tianjin   (China)

^c UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO   (United States)

^d THE AFFILIATED BRAIN HOSPITAL OF NANJING MEDICAL UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

angiography; dual energy; intracranial aneurysm; tomography; x ray computed

Indexed keywords

BONE; COMPUTERIZED TOMOGRAPHY; PATIENT TREATMENT;

BONE REMOVAL; COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHIC ANGIOGRAPHY; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIGITAL SUBTRACTION ANGIOGRAPHY; DUAL-ENERGY; DUAL-ENERGY CT; INTRACRANIAL ANEURYSMS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SUBARACHNOID HEMORRHAGES; X-RAY COMPUTED;

ANGIOGRAPHY;

ADULT; ARTICLE; COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHIC ANGIOGRAPHY; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC TEST ACCURACY STUDY; DIGITAL SUBTRACTION ANGIOGRAPHY; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; INTRACRANIAL ANEURYSM; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SUBARACHNOID HEMORRHAGE; TREATMENT INDICATION;

EID: 78650435473     PISSN: 03638715     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/RCT.0b013e3181eff93c     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Brisman JL, Song JK, Newell DW. Cerebral aneurysm. N Engl J Med. 2006;355:928-939.
2. Meyers PM, Schumacher HC, Higashida RT, et alAmerican Heart Association. Indications for the performance of intracranial endovascular neurointerventional procedures: A scientific statement from the American Heart Association Council on Cardiovascular Radiology and Intervention, Stroke Council, Council on Cardiovascular Surgery and Anesthesia, Interdisciplinary Council on Peripheral Vascular Disease, and Interdisciplinary Council on Quality of Care and Outcomes Research. Circulation. 2009;119:2235-2249.
3. Uysal E, Oztora F, Ozel A, et al. Detection and evaluation of intracranial aneurysms with 16-row multislice CT angiography: Comparison with conventional angiography. Emerg Radiol. 2008;15:311-316.
4. Jayaraman MV, Mayo-Smith WW, Tung GA, et al. Detection of intracranial aneurysms: Multi-detector row CT angiography compared with DSA. Radiology. 2004;230:510-518.
5. McKinney AM, Palmer CS, Truwit CL, et al. Detection of aneurysms by 64-section multidetector CT angiography in patients acutely suspected of having an intracranial aneurysm and comparison with digital subtraction and 3D rotational angiography. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2008;29:594-602.
6. van Rooij WJ, Sprengers ME, de Gast AN, et al. 3D rotational angiography: The new gold standard in the detection of additional intracranial aneurysms. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2008;29:976-979.
7. Kaufmann TJ, Huston J 3rd, Mandrekar JN, et al. Complications of diagnostic cerebral angiography: Evaluation of 19,826 consecutive patients. Radiology. 2007;243:812-819.
8. Agid R, Willinsky RA, Farb RI, et al. Life at the end of the tunnel: Why emergent CT angiography should be done for patients with acute subarachnoid hemorrhage. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2008;29:e45.
9. Fox AJ, Symons SP, Aviv RI. CT angiography is state-of-the-art first vascular imaging for subarachnoid hemorrhage. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2008;29:e41-e42.
10. Venema HW, Hulsmans FJ, den Heeten GJ. CT angiography of the circle of Willis and intracranial internal carotid arteries: Maximum intensity projection with matched mask bone elimination feasibility study. Radiology. 2001;218:893-898.
11. Tomandl BF, Hammen T, Klotz E, et al. Bone-subtraction CT angiography for the evaluation of intracranial aneurysms. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2006;27:55-59. (Pubitemid 46939884)
12. Romijn M, Gratama van Andel HA, van Walderveen MA, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of CT angiography with matched mask bone elimination for detection of intracranial aneurysms: Comparison with digital subtraction angiography and 3D rotational angiography. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2008;29:134-139.
13. Sakamoto S, Kiura Y, Shibukawa M, et al. Subtracted 3D CT angiography for evaluation of internal carotid artery aneurysms: Comparison with conventional digital subtraction angiography. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2006;27:1332-1337.
14. Loeckx D, Coudyzer W, Maes F, et al. Nonrigid registration for subtraction CT angiography applied to the carotids and cranial arteries. Acad Radiol. 2007;14:1562-1576.
15. Watanabe Y, Uotani K, Nakazawa T, et al. Dual-energy direct bone removal CT angiography for evaluation of intracranial aneurysm or stenosis: Comparison with conventional digital subtraction angiography. Eur Radiol. 2009;19:1019-1024.
16. Morhard D, Fink C, Graser A, et al. Cervical and cranial computed tomographic angiography with automated bone removal: Dual energy computed tomography versus standard computed tomography. Invest Radiol. 2009;44:293-297.
17. Uotani K, Watanabe Y, Higashi M, et al. Dual-energy CT head bone and hard plaque removal for quantification of calcified carotid stenosis: Utility and comparison with digital subtraction angiography. Eur Radiol. 2009;19:2060-2065.
18. Meyer BC, Werncke T, Hopfenmüller W, et al. Dual energy CT of peripheral arteries: Effect of automatic bone and plaque removal on image quality and grading of stenoses. Eur J Radiol. 2008;68: 414-422.
19. Zhang LJ, Wu SY, Niu JB, et al. Dual-energy CT angiography in the evaluation of intracranial aneurysms: Image quality, radiation dose, and comparison with 3D rotational digital subtraction angiography. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2010;194:23-30.
20. Lell MM, Kramer M, Klotz E, et al. Carotid computed tomography angiography with automated bone suppression a comparative study between dual energy and bone subtraction techniques. Invest Radiol. 2009;44:322-328.
21. Sarikaya B, Sarikaya S, Deniz FE, et al. Unregistered subtracted CT angiography for the visualization of intracranial arteries at or near the skull base: Preliminary experience. Diagn Interv Radiol. 2007;13:105-108.
22. Fletcher JG, Takahashi N, Hartman R, et al. Dual-energy and dual-source CT: Is there a role in the abdomen and pelvis? Radiol Clin N Am. 2009;47:41-57.
23. Thieme SF, Johnson TR, Lee C, et al. Dual-energy CT for the assessment of contrast material distribution in the pulmonary parenchyma. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2009;193:144-149.
24. Zhang LJ, Zhao YE, Wu SY, et al. Pulmonary embolism detection with dual-energy CT: Experimental study of dual-source CT in rabbits. Radiology. 2009;252:61-70.
25. Zhang LJ, Yang GF, Zhao YE, et al. Detection of pulmonary embolism using dual energy CT and correlation with cardiovascular measurements: A preliminary study. Acta Radiol. 2009;50:892-901.
26. Ruzsics B, Lee H, Zwerner PL, et al. Dual-energy CT of the heart for diagnosing coronary artery stenosis and myocardial ischemiaVinitial experience. Eur Radiol. 2008;18:2414-2424.
27. Boll DT, Patil NA, Paulson EK, et al. Renal stone assessment with dual-energy multidetector CT and advanced postprocessing techniques: Improved characterization of renal stone compositionVpilot study. Radiology. 2009;250:813-820.
28. Li Q, Lv F, Li Y, et al. Subtraction CT angiography for evaluation of intracranial aneurysms: Comparison with conventional CT angiography. Eur Radiol. 2009;19:2261-2267.
29. Pozzi-Mucelli F, Bruni S, Doddi M, et al. Detection of intracranial aneurysms with 64 channel multidetector row computed tomography: Comparison with digital subtraction angiography. Eur J Radiol. 2007;64:15-26.
30. Yoon DY, Lim KJ, Choi CS, et al. Detection and characterization of intracranial aneurysms with 16-channel multidetector row CT angiography: A prospective comparison of volume-rendered images and digital subtraction angiography. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2007;28:60-67.
31. Papke K, Kuhl CK, Fruth M, et al. Intracranial aneurysms: Role of multidetector CT angiography in diagnosis and endovascular therapy planning. Radiology. 2007;244:532-540.
32. Chen W, Yang Y, Xing W, et al. Sixteen-row multislice computed tomography angiography in the diagnosis and characterization of intracranial aneurysms: Comparison with conventional angiography and intraoperative findings. J Neurosurg. 2008;108:1184-1191.
33. Chen W, Wang J, Xing W, et al. Accuracy of 16-row multislice computerized tomography angiography for assessment of intracranial aneurysms. Surg Neurol. 2009;71:32-42.
34. Li Q, Lv F, Li Y, et al. Evaluation of 64-section CT angiography for detection and treatment planning of intracranial aneurysms by using DSA and surgical findings. Radiology. 2009;252:808-815.
35. Martin NA. Decision-making for intracranial aneurysm treatment: When to select surgery, and when to select endovascular therapy. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 1997;6:253-257.
36. Anxionnat R, Bracard S, Ducrocq X, et al. Intracranial aneurysms: Clinical value of 3D digital subtraction angiography in the therapeutic decision and endovascular treatment. Radiology. 2001;218:799-808.
37. Biondi A, Janardhan V, Katz JM, et al. Neuroform stent-assisted coil embolization of wide-neck intracranial aneurysms: Strategies in stent deployment and midterm follow-up. Neurosurgery. 2007;61:460-468.
38. Sedat J, Chau Y, Mondot L, et al. Endovascular occlusion of intracranial wide-necked aneurysms with stenting (Neuroform) and coiling: Mid-term and long-term results. Neuroradiology. 2009;51:401-409.
39. Mu SQ, Yang XJ, Li YX, et al. Endovascular treatment of wide-necked intracranial aneurysms using of "remodeling technique" with the HyperForm balloon. Chin Med J (Engl). 2008;121:725-729.
40. Akpek S, Arat A, Morsi H, et al. Self-expandable stent-assisted coiling of wide-necked intracranial aneurysms: A single-center experience. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2005;26:1223-1231.