STROBE and reporting observational studies in dermatology

British Journal of Dermatology

Volumn 164, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 1-3

  Langan, S M ^a   Schmitt, J ^b   Coenraads, P J ^c   Svensson, A ^d   Von Elm, E ^e   Williams, H C ^f  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA   (United States)

^b DRESDEN UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Germany)

^c UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER GRONINGEN   (Netherlands)

^d LUND UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Sweden)

^e UNIVERSITY OF LUCERNE   (Switzerland)

^f QUEEN S MEDICAL CENTRE   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DERMATOLOGY; EDITORIAL; GENETIC ASSOCIATION; HUMAN; MEDICAL LITERATURE; MEDICAL RESEARCH; OBSERVATIONAL STUDY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; STUDY DESIGN;

DERMATOLOGY; EPIDEMIOLOGIC RESEARCH DESIGN; EPIDEMIOLOGIC STUDIES; GUIDELINES AS TOPIC; HUMANS;

EID: 78650429623     PISSN: 00070963     EISSN: 13652133     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2133.2010.10136.x     Document Type: Editorial

References (8)

1. von Elm E, Altman DG, Egger M, et al. The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. Lancet 2007; 370: 1453-7. (Pubitemid 47562537)
2. von Elm E, Altman DG, Egger M, et al. The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. Ann Intern Med 2007; 147: 573-7. (Pubitemid 351664504)
3. Little J, Higgins JP, Ioannidis JP, et al. STrengthening the REporting of Genetic Association Studies (STREGA)-an extension of the STROBE statement. Genet Epidemiol 2009; 33: 581-98.
4. Langan SM, Schmitt J, Coenraads PJ, et al. The reporting of observational research studies in dermatology journals: a literature-based study. Arch Dermatol 2010; 146: 534-41.
5. Altman DG,. Better reporting of randomised controlled trials: the CONSORT statement. BMJ 1996; 313: 570-1.
6. Altman DG, Schulz KF, Moher D, et al. The revised CONSORT statement for reporting randomized trials: explanation and elaboration. Ann Intern Med 2001; 134: 663-94. (Pubitemid 32322245)
7. Adetugbo K, Williams HC,. How well are randomized controlled trials reported in the dermatology literature? Arch Dermatol 2000; 136: 381-5. (Pubitemid 30149113)
8. Alvarez F, Meyer N, Gourraud PA, Paul C,. CONSORT adoption and quality of reporting of randomized controlled trials: a systematic analysis in two dermatology journals. Br J Dermatol 2009; 161: 1159-65.