Standards-Based Middleware and Tools for Coastal Sensor Web Applications

IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing

Volumn 3, Issue 4, 2010, Pages 451-466

  Durbha, Surya S ^a   King, Roger L ^a   Amanchi, Santhosh K ^a   Bheemireddy, Shruthi ^a   Younan, Nicolas H ^a  

^a MISSISSIPPI STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Machine learning; mobile platform; ontology; sensor web; web services

Indexed keywords

COASTAL DOMAIN; DATA SETS; DESCRIPTION MODEL; GEO-SPATIAL; HIGH QUALITY; INFORMATION SOURCES; MACHINE-LEARNING; MARINE OBSERVATIONS; MOBILE PLATFORM; OCEANOGRAPHIC STUDY; ONTOLOGICAL MODELS; PUBLIC SAFETY; RDF QUERY LANGUAGE; SEMANTIC ENRICHMENT; SEMANTIC MAPPING; SEMANTIC MATCHING; SEMANTIC QUERY; SENSOR WEB; SENSOR WEB ENABLEMENT; SERVICES DISCOVERY; SHARED UNDERSTANDING; SPATIO-TEMPORAL SCALE; STANDARDIZED DATA MODELS; UNIVERSAL DESCRIPTION , DISCOVERY AND INTEGRATIONS; WEATHER SERVICES; WEB ONTOLOGY LANGUAGE FOR SERVICE;

DECISION MAKING; IMAGE MATCHING; INFORMATION RETRIEVAL; LEARNING SYSTEMS; MIDDLEWARE; MOBILE PHONES; ONTOLOGY; QUERY LANGUAGES; SEMANTIC WEB; SEMANTICS; SENSOR NETWORKS; SYNTACTICS;

WEB SERVICES;

ALGORITHM; BUOY SYSTEM; DATA INTERPRETATION; DECISION MAKING; MAPPING; OCEANOGRAPHY; SATELLITE IMAGERY; STANDARDIZATION;

STRIGIFORMES;

EID: 78650427597     PISSN: 19391404     EISSN: 21511535     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1109/JSTARS.2010.2056674     Document Type: Article

References (76)

1. “A Geospatial Framework for the Coastal Zone: National Needs for Coastal Mapping and Charting,” National Research Council Committee on National Needs for Coastal Mapping and Charting, Washington, D.C., 2004 [Online]. Available: http://www.nap.edu
2. 2004 [Online]. Available: http://www.ocean.us/documents/docs/ROWProceedings-composite-v3.doc
3. Federal Geographic Data Committee [Online]. Available: http://www. fgdc.gov
4. International Organization for Standardization [Online]. Available: http://www.iso.org
5. Open Geospatial Consortium [Online]. Available: http://www.open-geospatial.org/
6. OpenGIS Sensor Observation Service Implementation Specification, [Online]. Available: http://portal.opengeospatial.org/files/7arti-fact_id=20994
7. T. L. van Zyl, I. Simonis, and G. McFerren, “The sensor web: Systems of sensor systems,” Int. J. Digital Earth, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 16–30, Mar. 2009.
8. N. Jabeur, J. D. McCarthy, X. Xing, and P. A. Graniero, “A knowledge-oriented meta-framework for integrating sensor network infrastructures,” Comput. Geosci., vol. 35, no. 4, pp. 809–819, Apr. 2009.
9. S. H. L. Liang, A. Croitoru, and C. V. Tao, “A distributed geospatial infrastructure for sensor web,” Comput. Geosci., vol. 31, no. 2, pp. 221–231, Mar. 2005.
10. M. Botts and M. Reichardt, “Sensor Web Enablement White Paper,” Open Geospatial Consortium (OGC), 2006.
11. M. Botts, G. Pecivall, C. Reed, and J. Davidson, “OGC sensor web enablement: Overview and high level architecture,” in Lecture Notes in Computer Science, GeoSensor Networks. New York: Springer, 2008, pp. 175–190.
12. S. Chien, R. Sherwood, D. Tran, B. Cichy, G. Rabideau, R. Castano, A. Davies, D. Mandl, S. Frye, B. Trout, S. Shulman, and D. Boyer, “Using autonomy flight software to improve science return on earth observing one,” J. Aerosp. Comput., Inform. Commun., vol. 2, Apr. 2005.
13. S. Chien, B. Cichy, A. Davies, D. Tran, G. Rabideau, R. Castano, R. Sherwood, D. Mandl, S. Frye, S. Shulman, J. Jones, and S. Grosvenor, “An autonomous earth observing sensor web,” IEEE Intelligent Syst., 2005.
14. D. Mandl, N. Alameh, M. Bambacus, and P. Cappelaere, “Sensor web interoperability test bed results incorporating earth observation satellites,” in IPSN, 2007.
15. M. Shankar, B. L. Gorman, and C. M. Smith, “SensorNet operational prototypes: Building wide-area interoperable sensor networks,” in LCNS. New York: Springer, 2005, pp. 391–392.
16. I. N. Athanasiadis, “A methodology for developing agent-based systems in environmental informatics applications,” Doctoral, Electr. Comput. Eng. Dept., Aristotle Univ. of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece, 2005.
17. J. Nolan, “An agent-based architecture for distributed imagery and geospatial computing,” Ph.D. dissertation, George Mason Univ., Fairfax, VA, 2003.
18. D. Moodley and I. Simonis, “A new architecture for the sensor web: The SWAP framework november,” in Semantic Sensor Networks Conf., Athens, GA, 2006, pp. 5–9.
19. X. Sai, J. Li, and Z. Wang, “Knowledge-oriented sensor web for disaster management: From sensing to decision making,” Int. Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing, and Spatial Information Sciences, pt. B4, 2008.
20. S. M. Guru, P. Taylor, H. Neuhaus, Y. Shu, D. Smith, and A. Terhorst, “Hydrological sensorweb for the South Esk Catchment in the Tasmanian state of Australia,” in 4th IEEE Int. Conf. eScience, 2008.
21. N. Markovic, A. Stanimirovic, and L. Stoimenov, “Sensor web for river water pollution monitoring and alert system,” in 12th AGILE Int. Conf. Geographic Information Science, 2009.
22. B. Resch, D. Schmidt, and T. Blaschke, “Enabling geographic situational awareness in emergency management,” in Proc. 2nd Geospatial Integration for Public Safety Conf., New Orleans, LA, Apr. 2007, pp. 15–17.
23. B. Resch, M. Mittlboeck, S. Lipson, M. Welsh, J. Bers, R. Britter, and C. Ratti, “Urban sensing revisited - Common scents: Towards standardised geo-sensor networks for public health monitoring in the city,” in Proc. 11th Int. Conf. Computers in Urban Planning and Urban Management (CUPUM2009), Hong Kong, Jun. 2009, pp. 16–18.
24. A. Terhorst, D. Moodley, I. Simonis, P. Frost, G. McFerren, S. Roos, and F. van den Bergh, “Using the sensor web to detect and monitor the spread of vegetation fires in Southern Africa,” in Geosensor Networks, Springer Book Series—Advanced Notes in Computer Science. Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany: Springer, 2008, pp. 239–251.
25. D. Mandl, R. Sohlberg, C. Justice, S. Ungar, T. Ames, S. Frye, S. Chien, D. Tran, P. Cappelaere, D. Sullivan, and V. Ambrosia, “A Space-based sensor web for disaster management,” in Proc. IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symp., Boston, MA, 2008.
26. Semantic Web, [Online]. Available: http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/
27. L. Li and K. Taylor, “A framework for semantic sensor network services,” in 6th Int. Conf. Service Oriented Computing, 2008.
28. L. Ni, Y. Zhu, J. Ma, Q. Luo, Y. Liu, S. Cheung, Q. Yang, M. Li, and M. Wu, “Semantic sensor net: An extensible framework,” Int. J. Ad Hoc and Ubiquitous Computing, vol. 4, no. 3, 2009.
29. V. Huang and M. Javed, “Semantic sensor information description and processing,” in 2nd Int. Conf. Sensor Technologies and Applications, 2008.
30. A. Zafeiropoulos, N. Konstantinou, S. Arkoulis, D. Spanos, and N. Mitrou, “A semantic-based architecture for sensor data fusion,” in 2nd Int. Conf. Mobile Ubiquitous Computing, Systems, Services and Technologies, 2008.
31. A. Sheth, C. Henson, and S. S. Sahoo, “Semantic sensor web,” IEEE Internet Computing, vol. 12, no. 4, pp. 78–83, Jul. 2008.
32. C. A. Henson, J. K. Pschorr, A. P. Sheth, and K. Thirunarayan, “SemSOS: Semantic sensor observation service,” in Proc. 2009 Int. Symp. Collaborative Technologies and Systems (CTS 2009), Baltimore, MD, May 2009.
33. G. Babitski, S. Bergweiler, J. Hoffmann, D. Schon, C. Stasch, and A. C. Walkowski, “Ontology-based integration of sensor web services in disaster management,” in Proc. 3rd Int. Conf. Geospatial Semantics, Mexico City, Mexico, Dec. 2009.
34. P. Barnaghi, S. M. Meissner, M. Presser, and K. Moessner, “Sense and sensfability: Semantic data modelling for sensor networks,” in Proc. ICT Mobile Summit 2009, Jun. 2009.
35. A. Zafeiropoulos, N. Konstantinou, S. Arkoulis, D. Spanos, and N. Mitrou, “A semantic-based architecture for sensor data fusion,” in Proc. 2nd Int. Conf. Mobile Ubiquitous Computing, Systems, Services and Technologies, Sep.–Oct. 2008.
36. SensorML, [Online]. Available: http://vast.nsstc.uah.edu/SensorML/
37. OpenGIS Sensor Model Language (SensorML) Implementation Specification, Open Geospatial Consortium (OGC), 2006 [Online]. Available: http://portal.opengeospatial.org/files/7artifact_id=13879&ver-sion=2&format=doc
38. Google Web Tool (GWT) Kit, [Online]. Available: http://code.google, com/webtoolkit
39. Google Maps, [Online]. Available: http://code.google.com/apis/maps/
40. 52North Sensor Web Community, [Online]. Available: http://52north.org
41. Geography Markup Language (GML), [Online]. Available: http://www.opengeospatial.org/standards/gml
42. C. Chen and S. Helal, “Sifting through the jungle of sensor standards,” Pervasive Computing, vol. 7, no. 4, pp. 84–8, 2008.
43. G. H. Cheng, “Representing and reasoning about semantic conflicts in heterogeneous information sources,” Ph.D. dissertation, MIT, Boston, MA, 1997.
44. National Data Buoy Center [Online]. Available: http://www.ndbc.noaa. gov/
45. Gulf of Maine Ocean Observing System, [Online]. Available: www. gomoos.org
46. Web Ontology Language (OWL), [Online]. Available: http://www.w3. org/TR/owl-ref/
47. SPARQL Query Language, [Online]. Available: http://www.w3. org/TR/rdf-sparql-query/
48. A. Doan and A. Halevy, “Semantic integration research in the database community: A brief survey,” AI Mag., 2005.
49. N. Noy, “Semantic integration: A survey of ontology-based approaches,” in SIGMOD Conf., 2004.
50. M. Ehrig and S. Staab, “QOM—Quick ontology mapping,” in GI Jahrestagung, 2004.
51. A. Doan, J. Madhavan, P. Domingos, and A. Halevy, “Ontology matching: A machine learning approach,” in Handbook on Ontologies in Information Systems, S. Staab and R. Studer, Eds. New York: Springer-Velag, 2003.
52. A. Doan and P. Domingos, “Reconciling schemas of disparate data sources: A machine-learning approach,” in SIGMOD Conf., 2001.
53. N. Noy and M. Musen, “Anchor-PROMPT: Using non-local context for semantic matching,” in Proc. IJCAI 2001 Workshop on Ontology and Information Sharing, Seattle, WA, 2001.
54. S. Melnik and H. Garcia-Molina, “Similarity flooding: A versatile graph matching algorithm and its application to schema matching,” in Proc. 18th Int. Conf. Data Engineering (ICDE), San Jose, CA, 2002.
55. N. Noy and M. Musen, “PROMPT: Algorithm and tool for automated ontology merging and alignment,” in Proc. Nat. Conf. Artificial Intelligence (AAAI), 2000.
56. D. McGuinness, R. Fikes, J. Rice, and S. Wilder, “The Chimaera ontology environment,” in Proc. 17th National Conf. Artificial Intelligence (AAAI), 2000.
57. H.-H. Do and E. Rahm, “COMA—A system for flexible combination of schema matching approaches,” in Proc. Very Large Data Bases Conf. (VLDB), 2002.
58. J. Kengue, J. Euzenat, and P. Altchev, “OLA in the OAEI 2007 evaluation contest,” in Proc. ISWC 2007 Ontology Matching Workshop, Busan, Korea, 2007.
59. P. Mitra and N. Noy, “OMEN: A probabilistic ontology mapping tool,” in Proc. Meaning Coordination and Negotiation Workshop at the Int. Semantic Web Conf. (ISWC), 2004.
60. B. Scholkopf, C. Burges, and A. Smola, “Kernel principal component analysis,” in Advances in Kernel Methods-Support Vector Learning. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1999.
61. V. Vapnik, The Nature of Statistical Learning Theory. New York: Springer-Verlag, 1995.
62. Second String Library, [Online]. Available: http://secondstring.source-forge.net/
63. S. S. Durbha, R. King, and N. H. Younan, “Support vector machines regression for retrieval of leaf area index from multiangle imaging spectroradiometer,” Remote Sensing of Environment Special Issue: Multi-Angle Imaging SpectroRadiomenter (MISR), vol. 107, no. 1, pp. 348-36, 2007.
64. S. S. Durbha and R. King, “Semantics-enabled framework for knowledge discovery from earth observation data archives,” IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens., vol. 43, no. 11, pp. 2563–2572, Nov. 2005.
65. C. Baker and D. Noler, “Using Android in education for mobile device development,” in NSF-REU, 2008.
66. F. Curbera, W. Nagy, and S. Weerawarana, “Web services: Why and how,” in Workshop on Object-Oriented Web Services (OOPSLA), Tampa, FL, 2001.
67. Extensible Markup Language (XML) 1.0 W3C, 2000 [Online]. Available: http://www.w3.org/TR/2000/REC-xml-20001006
68. SOAP Version 1.2, W3C Working Draft December2000 W3C, 2001 [Online]. Available: http://www.w3.org/TR/2001/WD-soap12-part0-20011217/
69. E. Christensen et al., WSDL1.1 2001 [Online]. Available: http://www.w3.org/TR/2001/NOTE-wsdl-20010315
70. The UDDI Technical White Paper UDDI, 2000 [Online]. Available: http://www.uddi.org
71. S. A. McIlraith and D. L. Martin, “Bringing semantics to web services,” IEEE Intelligent Syst., vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 90–93, Jan. 2003.
72. OWL-S: Semantic Markup for Web Services W3C, 2004.
73. N. Srinivasan, M. Paolucci, and K. Sycara, “Adding OWL-S to UDDI, implementation and throughput,” in 1st Int. Workshop on SWS, Web Process Composition, 2004.
74. I. Levenstein, “Binary codes capable of correcting deletions, insertions and reversals,” Cybernetics and Control Theory, 1966.
75. M. A. Jaro “Probabilistic linkage of large public health data files (disc: P687-689),” Statistics in Medicine, vol. 14, pp. 491–498, 1995.
76. S. S. Durbha, R. L. King, and N. H. Younan, “An Information Semantics Approach for Knowledge Management and Interoperability for the Global Earth Observation System of Systems,” IEEE Syst. J., vol. 2, pp. 358–365, 2008.