Local government influence on energy conservation ambitions in existing housing sites-Plucking the low-hanging fruit?

Energy Policy

Volumn 39, Issue 2, 2011, Pages 916-925

  Hoppe, T ^a   Bressers, J Th A ^a   Lulofs, K R D ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TWENTE   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Energy conservation; Local climate policy; Urban renewal

Indexed keywords

CONSERVATION TARGETS; CONSERVE ENERGY; EMPIRICAL RESEARCH; ENERGY CONSERVATION POLICY; KEY FACTORS; LOCAL AUTHORITIES; LOCAL CLIMATE; LOCAL GOVERNMENT; NETHERLANDS; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; REFURBISHMENT PROJECTS; RESEARCH QUESTIONS; STEPPING STONE; TECHNICAL INNOVATION; URBAN RENEWAL;

APARTMENT HOUSES; BUILDINGS; ENERGY EFFICIENCY; PUBLIC POLICY;

ENERGY CONSERVATION;

ENERGY CONSERVATION; ENERGY EFFICIENCY; ENERGY POLICY; ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY; LOCAL GOVERNMENT; URBAN HOUSING; URBAN RENEWAL;

NETHERLANDS;

EID: 78650415707     PISSN: 03014215     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2010.11.016     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Barrutia, J.M., Echebarria, C., Aguado, I., 2007. Local Agenda 21 Implementation: Networking vs. Other Forms of Policy Making. paper presented at Joint Congress of the European Regional Science Association (47th Congress) and ASRDLF (Association de Science Régionale de Langue Française, 44th Congress), 29 August-2 September 2007, Paris.
2. Börzel, T.A., 1998. Organizing Babylon-On the Different Conceptions of Policy Networks. Public Administration, 75, Summer 1998, pp. 253-273.
3. Bouwend Nederland, 2005. De bouw in cijfers 2000-2004; uitgave van 2005, Gouda, June 2005.
4. Boyne G. Sources of public service improvement: a critical review and research agenda. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 2003, 13(3):367-394.
5. Bressers J.Th.A. Beleidsnetwerken en instrumentkeuze. Beleidswetenschap 1993, 4:309-330.
6. Bressers J.Th.A. Implementing sustainable development: how to know what works, where, when and how. Governance for Sustainable Development: The Challenge of Adapting Form to Function 2004, 284-318. Edward Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham. W.M. Lafferty (Ed.).
7. Bressers, H., 2009. From public administration to policy networks: contextual interaction analysis. In: Nahrath, S., Varone, F. (Eds.), Rediscovering Public Law and Public Administration in Comparative Policy Analysis: Tribute to Peter Knoepfel.
8. Bressers, J.Th.A., Klok, P.-J., 1993. De inhoud van het beleid. In: Hoogerwerf, A. (red.) Overheidsbeleid, een inleiding in de beleidswetenschap, fifth ed., Samsom Tjeenk Willink, Alphen aan den Rijn.
9. Bressers J.Th.A., O'Toole L.J. The selection of policy instruments: a network-based perspective. Journal of Public Policy 1998, 18(3):213-239.
10. De Bruijn J.A., Ten Heuvelhof E.F. Netwerkmanagement; Strategieën, Instrumenten en Normen 1991, Lemma, Utrecht.
11. De Bruijn, T.J.N.M., Lulofs, K.R.D., 1996. Bevordering van milieumanagement in organisaties. Ph.D. Thesis, Universiteit Twente, Enschede, 1996.
12. CBS Gemeente op Maat 2004 2005, Centraal Bureau voor de Statistiek, Voorburg/Heerlen.
13. CE, 2003. EPL Monitor 2003 Nieuwbouw- en herstructureringlocaties, Delft.
14. Coenen, F., Eckerberg, K., Lafferty, W.M., 1999. The status of LA21 in Europe: a comparative overview. In: Lafferty, W.M. (Ed.), Implementing LA21 in Europe: new initiatives for sustainable communities, Oslo.
15. Coenen F.H.J.M., Hoppe T. Globale uitdagingen op lokaal niveau. Bestuurswetenschappen 2010, 3:77-92.
16. COS, 2003. De grenzeloos duurzame gemeente; Verslag van de Lokale Duurzaamheidsspiegel 2003. COS Nederland, Alkmaar.
17. COS, 2005. Gemeenten van de toekomst; Verslag van de Lokale Duurzaamheidsmeter 2004/5. COS Nederland, Alkmaar.
18. Dowding K. Model or metaphor? a critical review of the policy network approach. Political Studies 1995, XLIII:136-158.
19. ECN, 2009. Verkenning Schoon en Zuinig; Effecten op energiebesparing, hernieuwbare energie en uitstoot van broeikasgassen. ECN Beleidsstudies Amsterdam, Petten, No. ECN-E-09-022.
20. Ecofys, 2004. Evaluatie van het klimaatbeleid in de gebouwde omgeving 1995-2002 report. Ecofys b.v., Utrecht.
21. Ecorys Resultaatsanalyse ISV1 2006, ECORYS Nederland BV, Rotterdam.
22. Evans, B., Joas, M., Sundback, S., Theobald, K., 2005. Governing Sustainable Cities, London.
23. 1937, Institute of Public Administration, New York. L. Gullick, L. Urwick (Eds.).
24. Kern, K., Koll, C., Schophaus, M., 2004. Local Agenda 21 in Germany; An Inter- and Intranational Comparison. Discussion paper, Wissenschaftszentrum Berlin für Sozialforschung, Berlin.
25. Kickert W.J.M., Klijn E.-H., Koppenjan J.F.M. Managing Complex Networks: Strategies for the Public Sector 1997, SAGE publications, London.
26. Klijn, E.-H., 1996. Regels en sturing in netwerken: de invloed van netwerkregels op de herstructurering van naoorlogse wijken, Ph.D. Thesis. Erasmus University, Rotterdam.
27. Knudsen, J., 2009. Environmental Policy Integration and Energy. Ph.D. Thesis. University of Twente, Enschede.
28. KplusV, 2006. 2e Tussenevaluatie BANS-regeling en BANS-uitvoering, opdrachtgever Senternovem, Arnhem.
29. Lynn L.E. Public management. A concise history of the field. The Oxford Handbook of Public Management 2007, 27-50. Oxford University Press, Oxford, New York. E. Ferlie, L.E. Lynn., C. Pollitt (Eds.).
30. Marsh D., Rhodes R.A.W. Policy communities and issue networks: beyond typology. Policy Networks in the British Government 1992, Clarendon Press, Gloucestershire. D. Marsh, R.A.W. Rhodes (Eds.).
31. Meier K.J., O'Toole L. Public management and educational performance. The impact of managerial networking. Public Administration Review 2003, 63(6):689-699.
32. Ministerie van Wonen, Wijken en Integratie, Ministerie van Volkshuisvesting, Ruimtelijke Ordening en Milieubeheer, Aedes en Vereniging Nederlandse Woonbond, 2008. Convenant Energiebesparing corporatiesector, Ede.
33. Nijkamp P., Perrels A. Sustainable Cities in Europe. A Comparative Analysis of Urban Energy-Environmental Policies 1994, Earthscan, London.
34. Noailly, J., 2010. Improving the energy efficiency of buildings. The impact of environmental policy on technological innovation. CPB discussion paper. CPB Netherlands Bureau for Economic Policy Analysis, The Hague.
35. SenterNovem, 2006. Division of budget BANS subsidy scheme, provided on request by author.
36. Smith M.J. Policy Networks. The Policy Process 1997, 76/86. Prentice Hall, London. M. Hill (Ed.).
37. Steers R. Problems in measurement of organizational effectiveness. Administrative Science Quarterly 1975, 20:546-558.
38. Taylor, F.W., 1912. Scientific Management. Excerpt from: Testimony before the US House of representatives, Washington.
39. UNCED, 1992. Report of the United Nations Conference on Environment and Development. Rio de Janeiro. 3-14 June 1992, vol. 1, Resolutions adopted by the Conference. United Nations, New York. Agenda 21.
40. VROM, Ministerie van, 2005. Evaluatienota Klimaatbeleid 2005; Onderweg naar Kyoto; Een evaluatie van het Nederlandse klimaatbeleid gericht op realisering van de verplichtingen in het Protocol van Kyoto. Ministerie van VROM, The Hague.
41. VROM, Ministerie van, 2005a. Division of budget subsidy scheme ISV, provided on request by author, Ministerie van VROM, 's Gravenhage.
42. Van der Waals J.F.M., Vermeulen W.J.V., Glasbergen P. Carbon dioxide reduction in housing: experiences in urban renewal projects in the Netherlands. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy 2003, 21:411-427.
43. W/E adviseurs, 2005. EPL Monitor 2004 herstructureringlocaties. Report, Gouda.
44. W/E adviseurs, 2007. EPL Monitor 2006 herstructureringlocaties. Report, Utrecht/Tilburg.