The patients preferences Questionnaire for Angina treatment: Results and psychometrics from 383 patients in primary care in England

Quality and Safety in Health Care

Volumn 19, Issue 6, 2010, Pages

  Bowling, A ^a   Reeves, B ^b   Rowe, G ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF BRISTOL   (United Kingdom)

^c INSTITUTE OF FOOD RESEARCH   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AGED; ANGINA PECTORIS; ARTICLE; FEMALE; GENERAL PRACTICE; HUMAN; MALE; PATIENT PREFERENCE; PRIMARY HEALTH CARE; PSYCHOMETRY; QUESTIONNAIRE; UNITED KINGDOM; VALIDATION STUDY;

AGED; ANGINA PECTORIS; ENGLAND; FEMALE; GENERAL PRACTICE; GREAT BRITAIN; HUMANS; MALE; PATIENT PREFERENCE; PRIMARY HEALTH CARE; PSYCHOMETRICS; QUESTIONNAIRES;

EID: 78650393324     PISSN: 14753898     EISSN: 14753901     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1136/qshc.2008.029975     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Cheng DC, Bainbridge D, Martin JE, et al. The Evidence-based Perioperative Outcomes Research Group. Does off-pump coronary artery bypass reduce mortality, morbidity, and resource utilization when compared with conventional coronary artery bypass? A meta-analysis of randomized trials. Anesthesiology 2005;102:188-203.
2. Sculpher M, Smith D, Clayton T, et al. Coronary angioplasty versus medical therapy for angina. Health service costs based on the second Randomized Intervention Treatment of Angina (RITA-2) trial. Eur Heart J 2002;23:1291.
3. Sudlow CL, Lonn E, Pignone M, et al. Secondary prevention of ischaemic cardiac events. In: Godlee F, ed. Clinical evidence. London: BMJ Publishing Group, 2000: 83-113.
4. Shaw M, Maxwell R, Rees K, et al. Gender and age inequity in the provision of coronary revascularisation in England in the 1990s: Is it getting better? Soc Sci Med 2004;59:2499-507.
5. Department of Health. National service framework for coronary heart disease: Modern standards and service models. London: Department of Health, 2000.
6. TIME Investigators. Trial of invasive versus medical therapy in elderly patients with chronic symptomatic coronary artery disease (TIME): A randomised trial. Lancet 2001;358:951-7.
7. Elder AT. Which benchmarks for age discrimination in acute coronary syndrome? Age Ageing 2005;34:4-5.
8. Richards H, McConnachie A, Morrison C, et al. Social and gender variation in the prevalence, presentation and general practitioner provisional diagnosis of chest pain. J Epidemiol Community Health 2000;54:714-8.
9. Richards HM, Reid ME, Watt GC. Socioeconomic variations in responses to chest pain: Qualitative study. BMJ 2002;324:1308.
10. Kennelly C, Bowling A. Suffering in deference: A focus group study of older cardiac patients' preferences for treatment and perceptions of risk. Qual Saf Health Care 2001;10:i23-8.
11. Bowling A, Culliford L, Smith D, et al. What do patients really want? Patients' preferences for treatment for angina. Health Expect 2008;11:137-47.
12. Chaturvedi N, Rai H, Ben-Shlomo Y. Lay diagnosis and health-care seeking behaviour for chest pain in south Asians and Europeans. Lancet 1997;350:1578-83.
13. Philpott S, Boynton PM, Feder G. Gender differences in descriptions of angina symptoms and health problems immediately prior to angiography: The ACRE study. Soc Sci Med 2001;52:1565-75.
14. Schecter AD, Goldschmidt-Clermont PJ, McKee G, et al. Influence of gender, race, and education on patients' preferences and receipt of cardiac catheterisations among coronary care unit patients. Am J Cardiol 1996;78:996-1001.
15. Say RE, Thomson R. The importance of patient preferences in treatment decisionsdchallenges for doctors. BMJ 2003;327:542-5.
16. King M, Nazareth I, Lampe F, et al. Conceptual framework and systematic review of the effects of participants' and professionals' preferences in randomised controlled trials. Health Technol Assess 2005;9:1-186.
17. Lambert N, Rowe G, Bowling A, et al. Reasons underpinning patients' preferences for various angina treatments. Health Expect 2004;6:246-56.
18. Rowe G, Lambert N, Bowling A, et al. Ascertaining patients' preferences for treatment for angina using a modified repertory grid method. Soc Sci Med 2005;60:2585-95.
19. Bowling A, Reeves B, Rowe G. Patients' preferences for treatment for angina: An overview of findings from three studies. J Health Serv Policy 2008;13(13 Suppl):104-8.
20. Scroter S, Lamping D. Coronary revascularisation outcome questionnaire (CROC): Development and validation of a new, patient based measure of outcome in coronary bypass surgery and angioplasty. Heart 2004;90:1460-6.
21. Degner LF, Sloan JA. Decision making during serious illness. J Clin Epidemiol 1995;45:941-50.
22. Crocker L, Algina J. Introduction to classical and modern test theory. Orlando: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich College Publishers, 1986.
23. Nunnally JC, Bernstein IH. Psychometric theory. New York: McGraw Hill, 1994.
24. Rust J, Golombok S. Modern psychometrics. The science of psychological assessment. 2nd edn. London: Routledge, 1999.
25. Streiner DL, Norman GR. Health measurement scales. A practical guide to their development and use. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2003.
26. Kline P. A handbook of test construction. London: Methuen, 1986.
27. Havlicek LL, Peterson NL. Effect of the violation of assumptions upon significance levels of the Pearson r. Psychol Bull 1977;84:373-7.
28. Kaiser H. A second generation Little Jiffy. Psychometrika 1970;35:401-15.
29. Kaiser H. An index of factorial simplicity. Psychometrika 1974;39:31-6.
30. Bartlett MS. A note on the multiplying factors for various chi square approximations. J Roy Statist Soc 1954;16:296-8.
31. Evidence-Based Medicine Working Group. Evidence based medicine; a new approach to teaching the practice of medicine. J Am Med Assoc 1992;268:2420-5.
32. Battista R. Practice guidelines for preventive care: The Canadian experience. Br J Gen Pract 1993;43:301-4.
33. Parker M. The ethics of evidence-based patient choice. Health Expect 2001;4:87-91.