Human nature is a garden

Interdisciplinary Science Reviews

Volumn 35, Issue 3-4, 2010, Pages 215-230

  Daston, Lorraine ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO   (United States)

Author keywords

CULTURE; G. E. R. LLOYD; HISTORY AND HUMAN NATURE; IAN HACKING; NURTURE; PARADIGMS; PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE; STYLE

Indexed keywords

G. E. R. LLOYD; HUMAN NATURE; NURTURE; PARADIGMS; PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE; STYLE;

CELL CULTURE; PERSONAL COMPUTING;

HISTORY;

EID: 78650384292     PISSN: 03080188     EISSN: 17432790     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1179/030801810X12772143409928     Document Type: Article

References (49)

1. Aristotle. 1994. The Nicomachean ethics, trans. H. Rackham, Loeb ed. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
2. Atran, Scott, and Douglas Medin, 2008. The native mind and the cultural construction of nature. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
3. Bacon, Francis. 1625. Of nature in men. In idem, The essayes or counsels, civill and morall, ed. Michael Kiernan. The Oxford Francis Bacon, vol. 15. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 2000.
4. Bunzl, Marti. 1996. Franz Boas and the Humboldtian tradition: From Volksgeist and Nationalcharakter to an anthropological concept of culture. In Volksgeist as method and ethic. Essays on Boasian ethnography and the German anthropological tradition, ed. George Stocking, 17-78. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
5. Carson, John. 2007. The measure of merit: Talents, intelligence, and inequality in the French and American republics, 1750-1940. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
6. Collingwood, R. G. 1960. The idea of nature. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
7. Comte, August. 1830-42. Cours de philosophic positive, 6 vols. Paris: Bachelier.
8. Cosmides, Leda, and John Tooby. 1997. Evolutionary psychology: A primer, http://www.psych.ucsb.edu/research/cep/primer.html (accessed March 2010).
9. Crombie, Alistair C. 1988. Designed in the mind: Western visions of science, nature and humankind. History of Science 24:1-12.
10. Crombie, Alistair C. 1994. Styles of scientific thinking in the European tradition: The history of argument and explanation especially in the mathematical and biomedical sciences and arts, 3 vols. London: Duckworth.
11. Daston, Lorraine. 1992. The naturalized female intellect. Science in Context 5:209-35.
12. Daston, Lorraine. 2001. The historicity of science. In Historicization-Historisierung, vol. 5 of Aporemata: Kritische Studien zur Philologiegeschichte, ed. Glenn W Most, 201-21. Gottingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.
13. de Candolle, Alphonse. 1872. Histoire des sciences et des savants depuis deux siècles. Geneva: H. Georg.
14. Elias, Norbert. 1939. Über den Prozess der Zivilisation. Soziogenetische und psychogenetische Untersuchungen, 2 vols. Revised edition 1977, vol. 1, 95-8. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.
15. Fan, Fa-Ti. 2004. Nature and nation in Chinese political thought: The national essence circle in early twentieth-century China. In The moral authority of nature, ed. Lorraine Daston and Fernando Vidal, 409-37. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
16. Fleck, Ludwik. 1935. Genesis and development of a scientific fact, ed. Thaddeus J. Trenn and Robert K. Merton, trans. Fred Bradley and Thaddeus J. Trenn, 1979, 38, 109. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
17. Galison, Peter. 1988. History, philosophy, and the central metaphor. Science in Context 2:197-212.
18. Galison, Peter, and David J. Stump, eds. 1996. The disunity of science: boundaries, contexts, and power. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
19. Galton, Francis. 1869. Hereditary genius. An enquiry into its laws and consequences. Gloucester, Mass.: Peter Smith, 1972.
20. Galton, Francis. 1874. English men of science. Their nature and their nurture, ed. Ruth Schwartz Cowan. London: Frank Cass, 1970, 12.
21. Glacken, Clarence J. 1967. Traces on the Rhodian shore: Nature and culture in Western thought from ancient times to the end of the eighteenth century. Berkeley/Los Angeles: University of California Press.
22. Golinski, Jan. 1998. Making natural knowledge: Constructivism and the history of science. New York: Cambridge University Press.
23. Goodman, Corey S., and Bridget C. Coughlin. 2000. The evolution of evo-devo biology. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 97 (9):4424-5.
24. Hacking, Ian. 1992. 'Style' for historians and philosophers. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 23:1-20.
25. Hacking, Ian. 1999. The social construction of what? Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
26. Hacking, Ian. 2009. Scientific reason. Taipei: National Taiwan University Press.
27. Heidel, William Arthur. 1910. A study of the conception of nature among the Pre-Socratics. Proceedings of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences 45:79-133.
28. Humboldt, Wilhelm von. 1830-35. Über die verschiedenheit des menschlichen Sprachbaues und ihren. Einß uß auf die geistige Entwicklung des Menschengeschlects, in idem, Gesammelte Schriften, 15 vols, ed. Albert Leitzmann, vol. 7, Berlin: Walter de Gruyter, 1968.
29. Hume, David. 1748. An enquiry concerning human understanding, ed. Eric Steinberg. Indianapolis: Hackett, 1977.
30. Husserl, Edmund. 1954. Die Krisis der europäischen Wissenschaften und die transzendentale Phänomenologie, ed. Reinhold N. Smid. Dordrecht: Kluwer, 1993.
31. Kuhn, T. S. 1962. The structure of scientific revolutions. Second enlarged edition 1970. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
32. Kuhn, T. S. 1970. Reflections on my critics. In Criticism and the growth of knowledge, ed. Imre Lakatos and Alan Musgrave, 231-78. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
33. Kuhn, T. S. 1977. The essential tension: Selected studies in scientific tradition and change. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
34. Kuper, Adam. 1999. Culture: the anthropologists' account. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
35. Lakatos, Imre, and Alan Musgrave, eds. 1970. Criticism and the growth of knowledge. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
36. Laplace, Pierre Simon. 1812. A philosophical essay on probabilities, trans. F. W. Truscott and F. L. Emory. New York: Dover, 1951.
37. Lévi-Strauss, Claude. 1949. Les Structures elementaires de la parenté. Paris: Presses universitaires de la France.
38. Lloyd, G. E. R. 2007. Cognitive variations: Reflections on the unity and diversity of the human mind. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
39. Lloyd, G. E. R. 2010. History and human nature: Cross-cultural universals and cultural relativities. Interdisciplinary Science Reviews, 35, 201-14.
40. MacKenzie, Donald A. 1981. Statistics in Britain, 1865-1930: The social construction of scientific knowledge. Edinburgh: University of Edinburgh Press, 58-68, 153-82.
41. Masterman, Margaret. 1970. The nature of a paradigm. In Criticism and the growth of knowledge, ed. Imre Lakatos and Alan Musgrave, 59-90. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
42. Montesquieu, Charles de Secondat de. 1748. Esprit des lois, avec les notes de l'auteur et un choix des observations. Revised ed. 1845. Paris: Firmin-Didot Frères, Li, p. 5 (my translation).
43. Patzer, Harald. 1993. Physis. Grundlegung zu einer Geschichte des Wortes. Sitzungsberichte der wissenschaftlichen Gesellschaft an der Johann Wolfgang Goethe-Universität Frankfurt am Main 30:217-80.
44. Piaget, Jean, and Bärbel Infelder. 1951. The origin of the idea of chance in children. Trans. Lowell Leake, Paul Burrell, and Harold D. Fischbein, New York: Norton, 1975.
45. Smiles, Samuel. 1871. Character. London: Murray.
46. Vogt, G., M. Huber, M. Thiemann, G. van den Boogaart, O. J. Schmitz, and C.D. Schubart. 2008. Production of different phenotypes from the same genotypes in the same environment by developmental variation. Journal of Experimental Biology 211 (4):510-23.
47. Wagner, Peter. 2000. The coming into being and (almost) passing away of 'society' as a scientific object. In Biographies of scientific objects, ed. Lorraine Daston, 132-57. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
48. West-Eberhard, Mary Jane. 2005. Developmental plasticity and the origin of species differences. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 102 (suppl. 1):6543-9.
49. Williams, Raymond. 1976. Keywords. A vocabulary of culture and society, revised ed. 1985. New York: Oxford University Press, 219-24, 87-93.