Transgenic tomato plants expressing recA and NLS-recA-licBM3 genes as a model for studying meiotic recombination

Russian Journal of Genetics

Volumn 46, Issue 12, 2010, Pages 1440-1448

  Komakhin, R A ^a   Komakhina, V V ^a   Milyukova, N A ^a,b   Goldenkova Pavlova, I V ^c   Fadina, O A ^a   Zhuchenko, A A ^c  

^a ALL RUSSIA RESEARCH INSTITUTE OF AGRICULTURAL BIOTECHNOLOGY   (Russian Federation)

^b RUSSIAN STATE AGRARIAN UNIVERSITY   (Russian Federation)

^c VAVILOV INSTITUTE OF GENERAL GENETICS   (Russian Federation)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BACTERIAL ENZYME; LICHENASE BM3; RECA PROTEIN; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

ARTICLE; CHROMOSOME SEGREGATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; DNA RECOMBINATION; ESCHERICHIA COLI; EUKARYOTE; EXTRACHROMOSOMAL INHERITANCE; GENE EXPRESSION; GENE INSERTION; GENETIC STABILITY; GENOTYPE; HAPLOTYPE; HOMOLOGOUS RECOMBINATION; MEIOSIS; NONHUMAN; NUCLEAR LOCALIZATION SIGNAL; POLLEN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROGENY; TOMATO; TRANSGENIC PLANT;

BACTERIA (MICROORGANISMS); ESCHERICHIA COLI; EUKARYOTA; LYCOPERSICON ESCULENTUM;

EID: 78650384227     PISSN: 10227954     EISSN: 16083369     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1134/S1022795410120069     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Park, E. M., Shigenaga, M. K., Degan, P., et al., Assay of Excised Oxidative DNA Lesions: Isolation of 8-Oxoguanine and Its Nucleoside Derivatives from Biological Fluids with a Monoclonal Antibody Column, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 1992, vol. 89, no. 8, pp. 3375-3379.
2. Haber, J. E., DNA Recombination: The Replication Connection, Trends Biochem. Sci. 1999, vol. 24, no. 7, pp. 271-275.
3. Shtam, T. A., Varfolomeeva, E. Yu., Semenova, E. V., and Filatov, M. V., Human RAD51 Recombinase: The Role in the Cell Cycle Checkpoint and Cellular Survival, Tsitologiya, 2008, vol. 50, no. 11, pp. 958-963.
4. Cox, M. M., Historical Overview: Searching for Replication Help in All the Rec Places, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 2001, vol. 98, no. 15, pp. 8173-8180.
5. Cox, M. M., Goodman, M. F., Kreuzer, K. N., et al., The Importance of Repairing Stalled Replication Forks, Nature, 2000, vol. 404, no. 6773, pp. 37-41.
6. McGlynn, P. and Lloyd, R. G., Recombinational Repair and Restart of Damaged Replication Forks, Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2002, vol. 3, no. 11, pp. 859-870.
7. Bogdanov, Yu. F. and Kolomiets, O. L., Sinaptonemnyi kompleks-indikator dinamiki meioza i izmenchivosti khromosom (Sinaptonemal Complex as an Indicator of Meiosis Dynamics and Chromosome Variation), Moscow: KMK, 2007.
8. Zhuchenko, A. A., Adaptivnaya sistema selektsii rastenii (ekologo-geneticheskie osnovy) (Adaptive System of Plant Breeding: Ecological Genetic Aspects), Moscow: Agroruss, 2001.
9. Zhuchenko, A. A. and Korol', A. B., Rekombinatsiya v evolyutsii i selektsii (Recombination in Evolution and Breeding), Moscow: Nauka, 1985.
10. Mezard, C. Meiotic Recombination Hotspots in Plants, Biochem. Soc. Trans. 2006, vol. 34, no. 4, pp. 531-534.
11. Li, W., Chen, C., Markmann-Mulisch, U., et al., The Arabidopsis AtRAD51 Gene Is Dispensable for Vegetative Development but Required for Meiosis, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 2004, vol. 101, no. 29, pp. 10596-10601.
12. Abe, K., Osakabe, K., Nakayama, S., et al., Arabidopsis RAD51C Gene Is Important for Homologous Recombination in Meiosis and Mitosis, Plant Physiol. 2005, vol. 139, no. 2, pp. 896-908.
13. Bleuyard, J. Y., Gallego, M. E., Savigny, F., and White, C. I., Differing Requirements for the Arabidopsis Rad51 Paralogs in Meiosis and DNA Repair, Plant J. 2005, vol. 41, no. 4, pp. 533-545.
14. Kurumizaka, H., Ikawa, S., Nakada, M., et al., Homologous-Pairing Activity of the Human DNA-Repair Proteins Xrcc3. Rad51C, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 2001, vol. 98, no. 10, pp. 5538-5543.
15. Brenneman, M. A., Wagener, B. M., Miller, C. A., et al., XRCC3 Controls the Fidelity of Homologous Recombination: Roles for Xrcc3 in Late Stages of Recombination, Mol. Cell, 2002, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 387-395.
16. Brenneman, M. A., Weiss, A. E., Nickoloff, J. A., and Chen, D. J., Xrcc3 Is Required for Efficient Repair of Chromosome Breaks by Homologous Recombination, Mutat. Res. 2000, vol. 459, no. 2, pp. 89-97.
17. Baumann, P. and West, S. C., Role of the Human RAD51 Protein in Homologous Recombination and Double-Strand-Break Repair, Trends Biochem. Sci. 1998, vol. 23, no. 7, pp. 248-251.
18. Lantsov, V. A., Homologous DNA-Transpherase RecA: Functional Activity and Search for Homology with the Help of Recombinating DNA, Mol. Biol. (Moscow), 2007, vol. 41, no. 3, pp. 467-477.
19. Reiss, B., Klemm, M., Kosak, H., and Schell, J., RecA Protein Stimulates Homologous Recombination in Plants, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 1996, vol. 93, no. 7, pp. 3094-3098.
20. Reiss, B., Schubert, I., Kopchen, K., et al., RecA Stimulates Sister Chromatid Exchange and the Fidelity of Double-Strand Break Repair, but not Gene Targeting, in Plants Transformed by Agrobacterium, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 2000, vol. 97, no. 7, pp. 3358-3363.
21. Shamina, N. V., Dorogova, N. V., Zagorskaya, A. A., et al., Male Meiosis Abnormalities in the Sterile Transgenic Line RES91 of Tobacco, Tsitologiya, 2000, vol. 42, no. 12, pp. 1159-1164.
22. Shamina, N. V., Dorogova, N. V., Sidorchuk, I. V., et al., Abnormalities of Meiotic Division Caused by T-DNA Tagged Mutation in Tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum L.), Cell Biol. Int. 2001, vol. 25, no. 4, pp. 367-369.
23. Sidorchuk, Yu. V., Zagorskaya, A. A., Deineko, E. V., et al., T-DNA Induced Flower Abnormalities and Male Sterility among Transgenic Tobacco Plants: Morphometric and Cytological Analysis, Tsitol. Genet. 2000, vol. 34, no. 6, pp. 3-8.
24. Bocharnikova, N. I. and Kozlova, V. M., Mutantnye Formy Tomatov (Mutant Forms of Tomato), Shtiintsa, 1992.
25. Park, S. H., Morris, J. L., Park, J. E., et al., Efficient and Genotype-Independent Agrobacterium-Mediated Tomato Transformation, J. Plant Physiol. 2003, vol. 160, no. 10, pp. 1253-1257.
26. Komakhin, R. A., Komakhina, V. V., and Zhuchenko, A. A., Creating of Genetic Constructions Containing Bacterial Gene recA of E. coli for Induction of Recombination in Plants, S-kh. Biol. 2007, no. 3, pp. 25-32.
27. Komakhin, R. A., Abdeeva, I. A., Dzhuzani, G. R., et al., Thermostabile Lichenase as a Translational Reporter, Russ. J. Genet. 2005, vol. 41, no. 1, pp. 31-39.
28. Pukhal'skii, V. A., Solov'ev, A. A., and Yurtsev, V. N., Tsitologiya i tsitogenetika rastenii (Cytology and Cytogenetics of Plants), Moscow: Mosk. S-kh. Akad., 2004.
29. Dospekhov, B. A., Metodika polevogo opyta (Methods of Field Experiment), Moscow: Kolos, 1973.
30. Alberts, B., Bray, D., Lewis, J., et al., Molecular Biology of the Cell, New York: Garland Press, 1994.
31. Shalev, G., Sitrit, Y., Avivi-Ragolski, N., et al., Stimulation of Homologous Recombination in Plants by Expression of the Bacterial Resolvase ruvC, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 1999, vol. 96, no. 13, pp. 7398-7402.
32. Marenkova, T. V. and Deineko, E. V., A Change in the Stability of Marker nrtII and uidA Gene Expression in Transgenic Tobacco Plants, Russ. J. Genet. 2006, vol. 42, no. 5, pp. 643-651.