The role of predictability in the stress response of a cichlid fish

Physiology and Behavior

Volumn 102, Issue 3-4, 2011, Pages 367-372

  Galhardo, Leonor ^a   Vital, Joana ^a   Oliveira, Rui F ^a,b  

^a INSTITUTO SUPERIOR DE PSICOLOGIA APLICADA   (Portugal)

^b INSTITUTO GULBENKIAN DE CIÊNCIA   (Portugal)

Author keywords

Anticipatory behaviour; Appraisal; Predictability; Stress; Tilapia

Indexed keywords

HYDROCORTISONE;

ANIMAL BEHAVIOR; ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ANIMAL HOUSING; ANIMAL HUSBANDRY; ANIMAL WELFARE; ANTICIPATION; ARTICLE; ASSOCIATION; BEHAVIOR; CICHLID; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEEDING; MALE; NONHUMAN; OREOCHROMIS MOSSAMBICUS; PERCEPTION; PHYSIOLOGY; PREDICTABILITY; PREDICTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; STRESS;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ANIMALS; ASSOCIATION LEARNING; CUES; HYDROCORTISONE; MALE; STRESS, PHYSIOLOGICAL; TILAPIA;

EID: 78650372649     PISSN: 00319384     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2010.11.035     Document Type: Article

References (53)

1. Cooper C.L., Dewe P. Stress: A Brief History 2004, 144. Blackwell Publishing, Oxford, UK.
2. Lazarus R.S. Stress and Emotion: A New Synthesis 1999, 342. Springer Publishing Company, New York, USA.
3. Ursin H., Eriksen H.R. The cognitive activation theory of stress. Psychoneuroendocrinology 2004, 29:567-592.
4. Steckler T. The neuropsychology of stress. Handbook of Stress and the Brain. Part 1: The Neurobiology of Stress 2005, 25-42. Elsevier, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. T. Steckler, N.H. Kalin, J.M.H.M. Reul (Eds.).
5. Désiré L., Boissy A., Veissier I. Emotions in farm animals: a new approach to animal welfare in applied ethology. Behav Processes 2002, 60:165-180.
6. Wendelaar-Bonga S.E. The stress response in fish. Physiol Rev 1997, 77:591-625.
7. Iwama G.K. The welfare of fish. Dis Aquat Organ 2007, 75:155-158.
8. Rose J.D. The neurobehavioral nature of fishes and the question of awareness and pain. Rev Fish Sci 2002, 10:1-38.
9. Sneddon L. Assessing pain perception in fish from physiology to behaviour. Comp Biochem Physiol A Mol Integr Physiol 2007, 146:S78.
10. Yue S., Duncan I.J.H., Moccia R.D. Investigating fear in rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) using the conditioned-suppression paradigm. J Appl Anim Welf Sci 2008, 11:14-27.
11. Butler A.B., Hodos W. Comparative Vertebrate Neuroanatomy: Evolution and Adaptation 2005, 715. John Wiley & Sons, Inc, New Jersey, USA.
12. Chandroo K.P., Duncan I.J.H., Moccia R.D. Can fish suffer?: perspectives on sentience, pain, fear and stress. Appl Anim Behav Sci 2004, 86:225-250.
13. Rodriguez F., Broglio C., Duran E., Gomez A., Salas C. Neural mechanisms of learning in teleost fish. Fish Cognition and Behaviour 2006, 243-277. Blackwell Publishing, Oxford, UK. C. Brown, K. Laland, J. Krause (Eds.).
14. Stolte E.H., de Mazon A.F., Leon-Koosterziel K.M., Jesiak M., Bury N.R., Sturm A., et al. Corticosteroid receptors involved in stress regulation in common carp, Cyprinus carpio. J Endocrinol 2008, 198:403-417.
15. Barreto R.E., Volpato G.L., Pottinger T.G. The effect of elevated blood cortisol levels on the extinction of a conditioned stress response in rainbow trout. Horm Behav 2006, 50:484-488.
16. Braithwaite V.A. Cognitive ability in fish. Behaviour and Physiology of Fish 2006, 1-35. Elsevier, Amesterdam, The Netherlands. K.A. Sloman, R.W. Wilson, S. Balshine (Eds.).
17. Galhardo L., Oliveira R.F. Psychological stress and welfare in fish. ARBS Annu Rev Biomed Sci 2009, 11:1-20.
18. Lovallo W.R. Stress & Health: Biological and Psychological Interactions 2005, Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, USA.
19. Sapolsky R.M. Why Zebras Don't Get Ulcers 2004, Henry Holt and Company, New York, USA.
20. Weiss J.M. Somatic effects of predictable and unpredictable shock. Psychosom Med 1970, 32:397-408.
21. Bassett L., Buchanan-Smith H.M. Effects of predictability on the welfare of captive animals. Appl Anim Behav Sci 2007, 102:223-245.
22. Orsini C., Ventura R., Lucchese F., Puglisi-Allegra S., Cabib S. Predictable stress promotes place preference and low mesoaccumbens dopamine response. Physiol Behav 2002, 75:135-141.
23. Prior H. Effects of predictable and unpredictable intermittent noise on spatial learning in rats. Behav Brain Res 2002, 133:117-124.
24. Whalen P.J. The uncertainty of it all. Trends Ecol Evol 2007, 11:499-500.
25. Bloomsmith M.A., Lambeth S.P. Effects of predictable versus unpredictable feeding schedules on chimpanzee behavior. Appl Anim Behav Sci 1995, 44:65-74.
26. Carlstead K. Predictability of feeding - its effect on agonistic behavior and growth in grower pigs. Appl Anim Behav Sci 1986, 16:25-38.
27. Gilbert-Norton L.B., Leaver L.A., Shivik J.A. The effect of randomly altering the time and location of feeding on the behaviour of captive coyotes (Canis latrans). Appl Anim Behav Sci 2009, 120:179-185.
28. Wiepkema P.R., Koolhaas J.M. Stress and animal welfare. Anim Welf 1993, 2:195-218.
29. Carlstead K. Effects of captivity on the behavior of wild mammals. Wild Mammals in Captivity: Principles and Techniques 1996, p317-p333. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago, USA. D.G. Kleiman, M.E. Allen, K.V. Thompson, S. Lumpkin (Eds.).
30. Johannesson T., Ladewig J. The effect of irregular feeding times on the behaviour and growth of dairy calves. Appl Anim Behav Sci 2000, 69:103-111.
31. Waitt C., Buchanan-Smith H.M. What time is feeding? How delays and anticipation of feeding schedules affect stump-tailed macaque behavior. Appl Anim Behav Sci 2001, 75:75-85.
32. Sánchez J.A., López-Olmeda J.F., Blanco-Vivesa B., Sánchez-Vázquez F.J. Effects of feeding schedule on locomotor activity rhythms and stress response in sea bream. Physiol Behav 2009, 98:125-129.
33. Oliveira R.F., Carneiro L.A., Canario A.V.M. No hormonal response in tied fights. Nature 2005, 437:207-208.
34. Winberg S., Lepage O. Elevation of brain 5-HT activity, POMC expression, and plasma cortisol in socially subordinate rainbow trout. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol 1998, 274:R645-R654.
35. Earley R.L., Edwards J.T., Aseem O., Felton K., Blumer L.S., Karom M., et al. Social interactions tune aggression and stress responsiveness in a territorial cichlid fish (Archocentrus nigrofasciatus). Physiol Behav 2006, 88:353-363.
36. Gomez-Laplaza L.M., Morgan E. The effect of time spent in isolation on the response to novel nonsocial stimulation in the angelfish Pterophyllum scalare. Can J Zool Rev Can Zool 2000, 78:530-537.
37. Gómez-Laplaza L.M., Morgan E. Social isolation, agression, and dominance in attacks in juvenile angelfish, Pterophyllum scalare. Agress Behav 1993, 19:213-222.
38. Hannes R.-P., Franck D. The effect of social isolation on androgen and corticosteroid levels in a cichlid fish (Haplochromis burtoni) and in swordtails (Xiphophorus helleri). Horm Behav 1983, 17:292-301.
39. Schjolden J., Backstrom T., Pulman K.G.T., Pottinger T.G., Winberg S. Divergence in behavioural responses to stress in two strains of rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) with contrasting stress responsiveness. Horm Behav 2005, 48:537-544.
40. Antunes R.A., Oliveira R.F. Hormonal anticipation of territorial challenges in cichlid fish. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Biol Sci 2009, 106:15985-15989.
41. Martin P., Bateson P. Measuring Behaviour: An Introductory Guide 2007, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
42. Ross L.G. Restraint, anaesthesia & euthanasia. Veterinary Practice & Procedures for Ornamental Fish 2001, 75-83. British Small Animal Veterinary Association, London, UK. W.H. Wildgoose (Ed.).
43. Foo J.T.W., Lam T.J. Serum cortisol response to handling stress and the effect of cortisol implantation on testosterone level in the tilapia, Oreochromis mossambicus. Aquaculture 1993, 115:145-158.
44. Vilhunen S., Hirvonen H. Innate antipredator responses of Arctic charr (Salvelinus alpinus) depend on predator species and their diet. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 2003, 55:1-10.
45. Yue S., Moccia R.D., Duncan I.J.H. Investigating fear in domestic rainbow trout, Oncorhynchus mykiss, using an avoidance learning task. Appl Anim Behav Sci 2004, 87:343-354.
46. Spruijt B.M., van den Bos R., Pijlman F.T.A. A concept of welfare based on reward evaluating mechanisms in the brain: anticipatory behaviour as an indicator for the state of reward systems. Appl Anim Behav Sci 2001, 72:145-171.
47. Manteuffel G., Langbein J., Puppe B. Increasing farm animal welfare by positively motivated instrumental behaviour. Appl Anim Behav Sci 2009, 118:191-198.
48. de Jonge F.H., Tilly S.L., Baars A.M., Spruijt B.M. On the rewarding nature of appetitive feeding behaviour in pigs (Sus scrofa): do domesticated pigs contrafreeload?. Appl Anim Behav Sci 2008, 114:359-372.
49. de Jonge F.H., Ooms M., Kuurman W.W., Maes J.H.R., Spruijt B.M. Are pigs sensitive to variability in food rewards?. Appl Anim Behav Sci 2008, 114:93-104.
50. Dudink S., Simonse H., Marks I., de Jonge F.H., Spruijt B.M. Announcing the arrival of enrichment increases play behaviour and reduces weaning-stress-induced behaviours of piglets directly after weaning. Appl Anim Behav Sci 2006, 101:86-101.
51. Ulyan M.J., Burrows A.E., Buzzell C.A., Raghanti M.A., Marcinkiewicz J.L., Phillips K.A. The effects of predictable and unpredictable feeding schedules on the behavior and physiology of captive brown capuchins (Cebus apella). Appl Anim Behav Sci 2006, 101:154-160.
52. Oliveira R.F., Almada V.C. Dominance hierarchies and social structure in captive groups of the Mozambique tilapia Oreochromis mossambicus (Teleostei: Cichlidae). Ethol Ecol Evol 1996, 8:39-55.
53. Galhardo L., Correia J., Oliveira R.F. The effect of substrate availability on behavioural and physiological indicators of welfare in the African cichlid (Oreochromis mossambicus). Anim Welf 2008, 17:239-254.