Trust-involved access control in collaborative open social networks

Proceedings - 2010 4th International Conference on Network and System Security, NSS 2010

Volumn , Issue , 2010, Pages 239-246

  Wang, Hua ^a   Sun, Lili ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN QUEENSLAND   (Australia)

Author keywords

Access control; Privacy; Purpose

Indexed keywords

ACCESS CONTROL MODELS; ACCESS CONTROL POLICIES; ACCESS POLICIES; ACCESS RIGHTS; KEY COMPONENT; MANAGEMENT FRAMEWORKS; PERSONALLY IDENTIFIABLE INFORMATION; PRIVACY; PRIVACY PRESERVING; PURPOSE; SOCIAL NETWORKS;

NETWORK SECURITY; SECURITY SYSTEMS;

ACCESS CONTROL;

EID: 78650361076     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/NSS.2010.13     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (25)

1. Agrawal, R., Kiernan, J., Srikant, R. and Xu,Y. 2002. Hippocratic atabases. Proceedings of the 28th International Conference on Very Large Databases (VLDB).
2. Ali, B., Villegas,W. and Maheswaran, M. (2007). A trust based approach for protecting user data in social networks. Proceedings of Conference of the Center for Advanced Studies on Collaborative research (CASCON07), Richmond Hill, Ontario, Canada.
3. Barth A., Mitchell, J.C. and Rosenstein J. 2004. Conflict and combination in privacy policy languages. Proceedings of the ACM workshop on Privacy in the electronic society, pages 45-46.
4. Carminati, B., Ferrari, E., and Perego, A. 2009. Enforcing access control in Web-based social networks. ACM Trans. Inf. Syst. Secur. 13, 1 (Oct. 2009), 1-38.
5. Chen, L: Facebooks Feeds Cause Privacy Concerns. the Amherst Student. Available at: http://halogen.note.amherst.edu/astudent/2006-2007/issue02/news/ 01.html, October 2006.
6. Cranor L. et al. 2006. The platform for privacy preferences 1.1 (P3P) specifi cation. W3C Working Group.
7. Crescenzo, G. and Lipton, R. J. 2009. Social Network Privacy via Evolving Access Control. In Proceedings of the 4th international Conference on Wireless Algorithms, Systems, and Applications (Boston, MA, August 16-18, 2009). B. Liu, A. Bestavros, D. Du, and J. Wang, Eds. LCSN, vol. 5682. Springer-Verlag, 551-560.
8. Gates, C. 2007. Access Control Requirements for Web 2.0 Security and Privacy. Position paper accepted to the Workshop on Web 2.0 Security and Privacy. Oakland, California, United States.
9. Golbeck, J. 2009. Trust and nuanced profi le similarity in online social networks. ACM Trans. Web 3, 4 (Sep. 2009), 1-33. DOI= http://doi.acm.org/10. 1145/1594173.1594174
10. Liu, K. and Terzi, E. 2009. A Framework for Computing the Privacy Scores of Users in Online Social Networks. ICDM '09: Proceedings of the 2009 Ninth IEEE International Conference on Data Mining, 288297. IEEE Computer Society.
11. Golbeck, J. 2009. Trust and nuanced profi le similarity in online social networks, ACM Trans. Web, vol. 3 (4), 133.
12. Golbeck, J.2005. Computing and applying trust in web-based social networks, University of Maryland at College Park, MD, USA.
13. Hart, R., Johnson,M. and Stent, A. 2007. More content - less control: access control in the web 2.0. In: Proceedings of the Web 2.0 Security and Privacy Workshop.
14. Kruk, S.; Grzonkowski, S.; Gzella, A.; Woroniecki, T.; Choi, H.-C. D-FOAF: Distributed Identity Management with Access Rights Delegation. In The Semantic Web ASWC 2006, Vol. 4185; Mizoguchi, R.; Shi, Z.; Giunchiglia, F., Eds.; Springer Berlin Heidelberg: 2006.
15. LeFevre, K., Agrawal, R., Ercegovac, V., Ramakrishnan, R., Xu, Y. and DeWitt, D. 2004. Limiting disclosure in hippocratic databases. Proceedings of the 13th VLDB conferenc. 108-119.
16. Li M., Sun X., Wang H. and Zhang Y., Optimal Privacyaware Path in Hippocratic Databases, The 14th International Conference on Database Systems for Advanced Applications( DASFAA2009), April 21-23, 2009, Brisbane, Australia.
17. Ni, Q., Lin, D., Bertino, E. and Lobo, J. 2007. Conditional privacy-aware role based access control. ESORICS, 72-89.
18. Ni, Q., Trombetta, A., Bertino, E., and Lobo, J. 2007. Privacyaware role based access control. Proceedings of the 12th ACM Symposium on Access Control Models and Technologies. France, 41-50.
19. Pitofsky, R. et al. 2000. Privacy online: Fair information practices in the electronic marketplace, a report to congress, Federal Trade Commission.
20. Schunter M. et al. 2003. The enterprise privacy authorization language (epal 1.1). W3C Working Group.
21. Seamons, K., Winslett, M. and Yu, T. 2001. Limiting the Disclosure of Access Control Policies during Automated Trust Negotiation. Proc. of NDSS01. 109-125.
22. Sun, X, Wang, H., Li, J. 2009. Injecting Purpose and Trust into Data Anonymization. to appear in The 18th ACM Conference on Information and Knowledge Management(CIKM 2009).
23. Wang, H., Zhang Y. and Cao, J. TKDE09. Effective collaboration with information sharing in virtual universities, IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering, Vol. 21(6), 840-853.
24. Wang, H., Cao, J. and Zhang, Y. 2008b. Access control management for ubiquitous computing, Future Generation Computer Systems, Vol. 24, Issue 8, Pages: 870-878, October, 2008
25. Wang, Y., Vassileva, J. 2003. Trust and reputation model in collaborative networks. in Proc. 3rd IEEE Int. Conf. Collaborative Computing. 150-157.