Improvement of the WENO scheme smoothness estimator

International Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids

Volumn 64, Issue 6, 2010, Pages 653-675

  Shen, Yiqing ^a   Zha, Gecheng ^a  

^a University of Miami College of Engineering   (United States)

Author keywords

Finite difference scheme; Smoothness estimator; Weighted essentially nonoscillatory scheme

Indexed keywords

FINITE DIFFERENCE SCHEME; NUMERICAL ACCURACY; NUMERICAL EXPERIMENTS; OPTIMAL WEIGHT; SMOOTH REGIONS; SMOOTHNESS ESTIMATOR; WEIGHTED ESSENTIALLY NONOSCILLATORY SCHEME; WENO SCHEMES;

FINITE DIFFERENCE METHOD;

ESTIMATION;

EID: 78650342374     PISSN: 02712091     EISSN: 10970363     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/fld.2168     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Jiang GS, Shu CW. Efficient implementation of weighted ENO schemes. Journal of Computational Physics 1996; 126:202-228.
2. Pirozzoli S. Conservative hybrid compact-WENO schemes for shock-turbulence interaction. Journal of Computational Physics 2002; 178:81-117.
3. Sjogreen B, Yee HC. Grid convergence of high order methods for multiscale complex unsteady viscous compressible flows. Journal of Computational Physics 2003; 185:1-26.
4. Latini M, Schilling O, Don WS. Effects of WENO flux reconstruction order and spatial resolution on reshocked two-dimensional Richtmyer-Meshkov instability. Journal of Computational Physics 2007; 221:805-836.
5. Shen YQ, Yang GW. Hybrid finite compact-WENO schemes for shock calculation. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids 2007; 53:531-560.
6. Shen Y-Q, Zha G-C, Wang B-Y. Improvement of stability and accuracy of implicit WENO scheme. AIAA Journal 2009; 47:331-344.
7. Liu XD, Osher S, Chan T. Weighted essentially non-oscillatory schemes. Journal of Computational Physics 1994; 115:200-212.
8. Harten A, Engquist B, Osher S, Chakravarthy S. Uniformly high order essentially non-oscillatory schemes, III. Journal of Computational Physics 1987; 71:231-303.
9. Shu C-W, Osher O. Efficient implementation of essentially non-oscillatory shock capturing schemes, II. Journal of Computational Physics 1989; 83:32-78.
10. Henrick AK, Aslam TD, Powers JM. Mapped weighted essentially non-oscillatory schemes: achiving optimal order near critical points. Journal of Computational Physics 2005; 208:206-227.
11. Borges R, Carmona M, Costa B, Don WS. An improved weighted essentially non-oscillatory scheme for hyperbolic conservation laws. Journal of Computational Physics 2008; 227:3191-3211.
12. Martin MP, Taylor EM, Wu M, Weirs VG. A bandwidth-optimized WENO scheme for the direct numerical simulation of compressible turbulence. Journal of Computational Physics 2006; 220:270-289.
13. Taylor EM, Martin MP. Stencil adaptation properties of a WENO scheme in direct numerical simulations of compressible turbulence. Journal of Scientific Computing 2007; 30:533-554.
14. Taylor EM, Wu M, Martin MP. Optimization of nonlinear error for weighted non-oscillatory methods in direct numerical simulations of compressible turbulence. Journal of Computational Physics 2007; 223:384-397.
15. Shu C-W, Osher O. Efficient implementation of essentially non-oscillatory shock capturing schemes. Journal of Computational Physics 1988; 77:439-471.
16. Cockburn B, Shu CW. Nonlinearly stable compact schemes for shock calculations. SIAM Journal on Numerical Analysis 1994; 31:607-627.
17. Shen YQ, Yang GW, Gao Z. High-resolution finite compact difference schemes for hyperbolic conservation laws. Journal of Computational Physics 2006; 216:114-137.
18. Pirozzoli S. Conservative hybrid compact-WENO schemes for shock-turbulence interaction. Journal of Computational Physics 2002; 178:81-117.