The effect of soil data resolution on hydrological processes modelling in a large humid watershed

Hydrological Processes

Volumn 25, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 130-140

  Ye, Xuchun ^a,c   Zhang, Qi ^a   Viney, N R ^b  

^a NANJING INSTITUTE OF GEOGRAPHY AND LIMNOLOGY   (China)

^b CSIRO   (Australia)

^c UNIVERSITY OF CHINESE ACADEMY OF SCIENCES   (China)

Author keywords

Hydrological processes; Poyang Lake catchment; Spatial resolution of soil data; SWAT model

Indexed keywords

ACCURATE PREDICTION; CALCULATION METHODS; DATA CHARACTERIZING; HIGHER RESOLUTION; HUMID WATERSHEDS; HYDROLOGICAL PROCESS; HYDROLOGICAL RESPONSE UNIT; INPUT DATAS; KEY PARAMETERS; LARGE-SCALE WATERSHEDS; MODEL SIMULATION; PHYSICAL MEANINGS; POYANG LAKE; SEASONAL VARIATION; SIMULATION RESULT; SOIL AND WATER ASSESSMENT TOOL; SOIL DATA; SOIL DATASETS; SOIL MAPS; SOIL WATER CONTENT; SOIL WATER STORAGE; SPATIAL RESOLUTION; SWAT MODEL; XINJIANG;

CATCHMENTS; FLOW SIMULATION; HYDRAULICS; IMAGE RESOLUTION; INPUT OUTPUT PROGRAMS; LAKES; LANDFORMS; RIVERS; RUNOFF; SOIL MOISTURE; STREAM FLOW; UNDERWATER SOILS; WATER CONTENT; WATER SUPPLY; WATERSHEDS;

GEOLOGIC MODELS;

CATCHMENT; COMPUTER SIMULATION; EVAPOTRANSPIRATION; HUMID ENVIRONMENT; HYDROLOGICAL MODELING; HYDROLOGICAL RESPONSE; SOIL WATER; SPATIAL RESOLUTION; STREAMFLOW; WATERSHED;

CHINA; JIANGXI; POYANG LAKE; XIN RIVER;

EID: 78650339327     PISSN: 08856087     EISSN: 10991085     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/hyp.7823     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Abbot BM, Refsgaard JC. 1996. Distributed Hydrological Modelling, Kluwer Academic Publishers: The Netherlands; 1-6.
2. Arnold JG, Allen PM. 1999. Automated methods for estimating baseflow and ground water recharge from streamflow records. Journal of the American Water Resources Association 35(2): 411-424.
3. Arnold JG, Srinivasan R, Muttiah RS, Williams JR. 1998. Large area hydrologic modelling and assessment part I: model development. Journal of the American Water Resources Association 34(1): 73-89.
4. Chaplot V. 2005. Impact of DEM mesh size and soil map precision for the prediction of water, sediment and NO3 loads in a watershed. Journal of Hydrology 312: 207-222.
5. Chen R, Pi L, Hsieh C. 2005. Application of parameter optimization method for calibrating tank model. Journal of American Water Resources Association 41(2): 389-402.
6. Corwin DL. 1996. GIS applications of deterministic solute transport models for regional-scale assessment of non-point source pollutants in the vadose zone. In Applications of GIS to the modelling of non-point source pollutants in the vadose zone, Corwin DL, Laogue K (eds). SSSA Special Publication No. 48SSSA: Madison, WI; 69-100.
7. Geza M, McCray JE. 2008. Effects of soil data resolution on SWAT model stream flow and water quality predictions. Journal of Environmental Management 88(2008): 393-406.
8. Lenhart T, Eckhardt K, Fohrer N, Frede HG. 2002. Comparison of two different approaches of sensitivity analysis. Physics and Chemistry of the Earth 27: 645-654.
9. Levick LR, Semmens DJ, Guertin DP, Burns IS, Scott SN, Unkrich CL, Goodrich DC. 2004. Adding global soils data to the automated geospatial watershed assessment tool (AGWA). CD Proceedings of the Second International Symposium on Transboundary Waters Management. Tucson, AZ, 16-19 November 2004, 8 pp.
10. Li ZL, Xu ZX, Shao QX, Yang J. 2009. Parameter estimation and uncertainty analysis of SWAT model in upper reaches of the Heihe river basin. Hydrological Processes 23: 2744-2753.
11. Monteith JL. 1965. Evaporation and environment. In The State and Movement of Water in Living Organisms, Fogg GF (eds). Cambridge University Press: Cambridge; 205-234.
12. Moriasi DN, Arnold JG, Van Liew MW, Bingner RL, Harmel RD, Veith TL. 2007. Model evaluation guidelines for systematic quantification of accuracy in watershed simulations. Transactions of the ASABE 50(3): 885-900.
13. Muttiah RS, Wurbs RA. 2002. Scale-dependent soil and climate variability effects on watershed water balance of the SWAT model. Journal of Hydrology 256: 264-285.
14. Neitsch SL, Arnold JG, Kiniry JR, Srinivasan R, Williams JR. 2002a. Soil and Water Assessment Tool: User's Manual, Version 2000. Texas Water Resources Institute: College station, Texas; 1-5.
15. Neitsch SL, Arnold JG, Kiniry JR, Williams JR, King KW. 2002b. Soil and Water Assessment Tool: Theoretical Documentation, Version 2000. Texas Water Resources Institute: College station, Texas; 6-12.
16. Peschel JM, Haan PK, Lacey RE. 2003. A SSURGO Pre-Processing Extension 798 for the Arc View Soil and Water Assessment Tool. ASAE Paper no. 032123, St.799 Joseph, Michigan.
17. Prasanna HG, Mulla DJ. 2005. Scale effects of STATSGO vs. SSURGO soil databases on water quality predictions. Watershed Management to Meet Water Quality Standards and Emerging (Total Maximum Daily Load) (TMDL). Proceedings of the Third Conference, 5-9 March 2005, Atlanta, GA.
18. Romanowicz AA, Vanclooster M, Rounsevell M, La Junesse I. 2005. Sensitivity of the SWAT model to the soil and land use data parameterization: a case study in the Thyle catchment, Belgium. Ecological Modelling 187(1): 27-39.
19. Seyfried M. 1998. Spatial variability constructions to modelling soil water at different scales. Geoderma 85: 231-254.
20. Shi XZ, Yu DS, Warner ED, Pan XZ, Petersen GW, Gong ZT, Weindorf DC. 2004. Soil database of 1:1000, 000 digital soil survey and reference system of the Chinese genetic soil classification system. Soil Survey Horizons 45(4): 129-136.
21. Shi XZ, Yu DS, Warner ED, Sun WX, Petersen GW, Gong ZT, Lin H. 2006. Cross-reference system for translating between genetic soil classification of China and soil taxonomy. Soil Science Society of America Journal 70(1): 78-83.
22. USDA Soil Conservation Service. 1972. National Engineering Handbook Section 4 Hydrology, Chapter 4-10.
23. Van Griensven A, Meixner T, Grunwald S, Bishop T, Di luzio M, Srinivasan R. 2006. A global sensitivity analysis tool for the parameters of multi-variable catchment models. Journal of Hydrology 324: 10-12.
24. Wang X, Melesse AM. 2006. Effects of STATSGO and SSURGO as inputs on SWAT model's snowmelt simulation. Journal of American Water Resources Association 42(5): 1217-1236.
25. Waring RH, Running SW. 1998. Forest Ecosystem Analysis at Multiple Scales, Academic Press: New York.
26. Zhang XS, Srinivasan R, Zhao KG, Liew MV. 2009. Evaluation of global optimization algorithms for parameter calibration of a computationally intensive hydrologic model. Hydrological Processes 23: 430-441.
27. Zhu AX, Hudson B, Burt J, Lubich K, Simonson D. 2001. Soil mapping using GIS, expert knowledge, and fuzzy logic. Soil Science Society of American Journal 65(5): 1463-1472.
28. Zhu AX, Mackay DS. 2001. Effects of spatial detail of soil information on watershed modelling. Journal of Hydrology 248: 54-57.