HTN planning with preferences

IJCAI International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence

Volumn , Issue , 2009, Pages 1790-1797

  Sohrabi, Shirin ^a   Baier, Jorge A ^a   McIlraith, Sheila A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE;

BRANCH-AND-BOUND ALGORITHMS; HIERARCHICAL TASK NETWORKS; HTN PLANNING; INTERNATIONAL PLANNING COMPETITIONS; PLANNING DOMAIN DEFINITION LANGUAGE; PREFERENCE-BASED;

BRANCH AND BOUND METHOD;

EID: 78650334586     PISSN: 10450823     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (16)

1. F. Bacchus and F. Kabanza. Planning for temporally extended goals. Annals of Mathematics and Artificial Intelligence, 22(1-2):5-27, 1998.
2. J. A. Baier, F. Bacchus, and S. A. McIlraith. A heuristic search approach to planning with temporally extended preferences. Artificial Intelligence, 173(5-6):593-618, 2009.
3. M. Bienvenu, C. Fritz, and S. A. McIlraith. Planning with qualitative temporal preferences. In Proc. of the 10th Int'l Conference on Knowledge Representation and Reasoning (KR), 134-144, 2006.
4. A. Gabaldon. Programming hierarchical task networks in the situation calculus. In AIPS'02 Workshop on On-line Planning and Scheduling, April 2002.
5. A. Gabaldon. Precondition control and the progression algorithm. In Proc. of the 9th Int'l Conference on Knowledge Representation and Reasoning (KR), 634-643. AAAI Press, 2004.
6. A. Gerevini, P. Haslum, D. Long, A. Saetti, and Y. Dimopoulos. Deterministic planning in the fifth international planning competition: PDDL3 and experimental evaluation of the planners. Artificial Intelligence, 173(5-6):619-668, 2009.
7. M. Ghallab, D. Nau, and P. Traverso. Hierarchical Task Network Planning. Automated Planning: Theory and Practice. Morgan Kaufmann, 2004.
8. C.-W. Hsu, B. Wah, R. Huang, and Y. Chen. Constraint partitioning for solving planning problems with trajectory constraints and goal preferences. In Proc. of the 20th Int'l Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI), 1924-1929, 2007.
9. S. Kambhampati, A. D. Mali, and B. Srivastava. Hybrid planning for partially hierarchical domains. In Proc. of the 15th National Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI), 882-888, 1998.
10. U. Kuter, E. Sirin, D. S. Nau, B. Parsia, and J. A. Hendler. Information gathering during planning for web service composition. In Proc. of the 3rd Int'l Semantic Web Conference (ISWC), 335-349, 2004.
11. N. Lin, U. Kuter, and E. Sirin. Web service composition with user preferences. In Proceedings of the 5th European Semantic Web Conference (ESWC), 629-643, 2008.
12. K. L. Myers. Planning with conflicting advice. In Proc. of the 5th Int'l Conference on Artificial Intelligence Planning and Scheduling (AIPS), 355-362, 2000.
13. D. Nau, T.-C. Au, O. Ilghami, U. Kuter, J. Murdock, D. Wu, and F. Yaman. SHOP2: An HTN planning system. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research, 20:379-404, 2003.
14. G. Rabideau, B. Engelhardt, and S. A. Chien. Using generic preferences to incrementally improve plan quality. In Proc. of the 5th Int'l Conference on Artificial Intelligence Planning and Scheduling (AIPS), 236-245, 2000.
15. R. Reiter. Knowledge in Action: Logical Foundations for Specifying and Implementing Dynamical Systems. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 2001.
16. S. Sohrabi and S. A. McIlraith. On planning with preferences in HTN. In Proc. of the 12th Int'l Workshop on Non-Monotonic Reasoning (NMR), 241-248, 2008.