Stimulus-driven capture and contingent capture

Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Cognitive Science

Volumn 1, Issue 6, 2010, Pages 872-881

  Theeuwes, Jan ^a   Olivers, Christian N L ^a   Belopolsky, Artem ^a  

^a VU UNIVERSITY AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 78650333911     PISSN: 19395078     EISSN: 19395086     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/wcs.83     Document Type: Review

References (56)

1. Hickey C, McDonald JJ, Theeuwes J. Electrophysiological evidence of attention capture. J Cogn Neurosci 2006, 18:604-613.
2. Theeuwes J. Cross-dimensional perceptual selectivity. Percept Psychophys 1991, 50:184-193.
3. Theeuwes J. Perceptual selectivity for color and form. Percept Psychophys 1992, 51:599-606.
4. Theeuwes J. Stimulus-driven capture and attentional set: selective search for color and visual abrupt onsets. J Exp Psychol 1994, 20:799-806.
5. Theeuwes J. Endogenous and exogenous control of visual selection. Percept Psychophys 1994, 23:429-440.
6. Theeuwes J. Perceptual selectivity for color and form: on the nature of the interference effect. In: Kramer AF, Coles MGH, Logan GD, eds. Converging Operations in the Study of Visual Attention. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association; 1996, 297-314.
7. Theeuwes J. Temporal and spatial characteristics of preattentive and attentive processing. Visual Cognition 2005, 2:221-233.
8. Theeuwes J, Atchley P, Kramer AF. On the time course of top-down and bottom-up control of visual attention. In:Monsell S, Driver J, eds. Attention and Performance, vol. 18. Cambridge: MIT Press; 2000.
9. Theeuwes J, Godijn R. Irrelevant singletons capture attention: evidence from inhibition of return. Percept Psychophys 2002, 64:764-770.
10. Theeuwes J, Reimann B, Mortier K. Visual search for featural singletons: no top-down modulation, only bottom-up priming. Vis Cogn 2006, 14:466-489.
11. Van Zoest W, Donk M, Theeuwes J. The role of stimulus-driven and goal-driven control in visual selection. J Exp Psychol 2004, 30:746-759.
12. Itti L, Koch C. Computational modeling of visual attention. Nat Rev Neurosci 2001, 2:194-203.
13. Egeth HE, Yantis S. Visual attention: Control, representation, and time course. Ann Rev Psychol 1997, 48:269-297.
14. Folk CL, Remington RW, Johnston JC. Involuntary covert orienting is contingent on attentional control settings. J Exp Psychol 1992, 18:1030-1044.
15. Folk CL, Remington RW, Wright JH. The structure of attentional control: contingent attention capture by apparent motion, abrupt onset, and color. J Exp Psychol 1994, 20:317-329.
16. Folk CM, Remington RW. Selectivity in distraction by irrelevant featural singletons: evidence for two forms of attention capture. J Exp Psychol 1998, 24:847-858.
17. Mü ller HJ, Reimann B, Krummenacher J. Visual search for singleton feature targets across dimensions: stimulus- and expectancy-driven effects in dimensional weighting. J Exp Psychol 2003, 29:1021-1035.
18. Wolfe JM. Guided search 2.0: a revised model of visual search. Psychon Bull Rev 1994, 1:202-238.
19. Wolfe JM, Butcher SJ, Lee C, Hyle M. Changing your mind: on the contributions of top-down and bottom-up guidance in visual search for feature singletons. J Exp Psychol 2003, 29:483-502.
20. Broadbent DE. Perception and communication. London: Pergamon Press; 1958.
21. Neisser U. Cognitive Psychology. Englewood Cliffs,NJ: Prentice-Hall; 1967.
22. Treisman A, Gelade G. A feature integration theory of attention. Cogn Psychol 1980, 12:97-136.
23. Koch C, Ullman S. Shifts in selective visual attention: towars the underlying neural circuity. Human Neurobiol 1985, 4:219-227.
24. Li Z. A saliency map in primary visual cortex. Trends Cogn Sci 2002, 6:9-16.
25. Treue S. Climbing the cortical ladder from sensation to perception. Trends Cogn Sci 2003, 7:469-471.
26. Bundesen C. A theory of visual attention. Psychol Rev 1990, 97:523-547.
27. Deutsch JA, Deutsch D. Attention: some theoretical considerations. Psychol Rev 1963, 70:51-61.
28. Yantis S, Egeth HE. On the distinction between visual salience and stimulus-driven attention capture. J Exp Psychol 1999, 25:661-676.
29. Theeuwes J, Kramer AF, Hahn S, Irwin DE. Our eyes do not always go where we want them to go: capture of the eyes by new objects. Psychol Sci 1998, 9:379-385.
30. Kim MS, Cave KR. Top-down and bottom-up attentional control: on the nature of interference from a salient distractor. Percept Psychophys 1999, 61:1009-1023.
31. Bacon WF, Egeth HE. Overriding stimulusdriven attention capture. Percept Psychophys 1994, 55:485-496.
32. Kawahara J, Toshima T. Stimulus-driven control of attention: evidence from visual search for moving target among static nontargets. Jpn J Psychon Sci 1996, 15:77-87.
33. Kumada T. Limitations in attending to a feature value for overriding stimulus-driven interference. Percept Psychophys 1999, 61:61-79.
34. Mounts JRW. Attention capture by abrupt onsets and feature singletons produces inhibitory surrounds. Percept Psychophys 2000, 62:1485-1493.
35. Theeuwes J, Kramer AF, Kingstone A. Attention capture modulates perceptual sensitivity. Psychon Bull Rev 2004, 11:551-554.
36. Theeuwes J, Chen CYD. Attention capture and inhibition (of return): the effect on perceptual sensitivity. Percept Psychophys 2005, 67:1305-1312.
37. Folk CL, Remington R. Top-down modulation of preattentive processing: testing the recovery account of contingent capture. Vis Cogn 2006, 14:445-465.
38. Gibson BS, Amelio J. Inhibition of return and attentional control settings. Percept Psychophys 2000, 62:496-504.
39. Remington RW, Folk C, McLean JP. Contingent attention capture or delayed allocation of attention? Percept Psychophys 2001, 63:298-307.
40. Pratt J, Sekuler A, McAuliffe J. The role of attentional set on attentional cueing and inhibition of return. Vis Cogn 2001, 8:33-46.
41. Yeh SL, Liao HI.On the generality of the contingent orienting hypothesis. Acta Psychol 2008, 129:157-165.
42. Yantis S, Jonides J. Abrupt visual onsets and selective attention: evidence from selective search. J Exp Psychol 1984, 10:601-621.
43. Jonides J, Yantis S. Uniqueness of abrupt visual onset in capturing attention. Percept Psychophys 1988, 43:346-354.
44. Schreij D, Owens C, Theeuwes J. Abrupt onsets capture attention independent of top-down control settings. Percept Psychophys 2008, 70:208-218.
45. Folk CL, Remington RW, Wu SC. Additivity of abrupt onset effects supports nonspatial distraction, not the capture of spatial attention. Percept Psychophys 2009, 71:308-313.
46. Chen P, Mordkoff JT. Contingent capture at a very short SOA: evidence against rapid disengagement. Vis Cogn 2007, 15:637-646.
47. Lamy D, Egeth HE. Attention capture in singletondetection and feature-search modes. J Exp Psychol 2003, 29:1003-1020.
48. Kahneman D, Treisman A, Burkell J. The costs of visual filtering. J Exp Psychol 1983, 9:510-522.
49. Theeuwes J. Top-down search strategies cannot override attention capture. Psychon Bull Rev 2004, 11:65-70.
50. Leber AB, Egeth HE. It's under control: top-down search strategies can override attention capture. Psychon Bull Rev 2006, 13:132-138.
51. Yantis S, Jonides J. Abrupt visual onsets and selective attention: voluntary versus automatic allocation. J Exp Psychol 1990, 16:121-134.
52. Theeuwes J. Exogenous and endogenous control of attention: the effect of visual onsets and offsets. Percept Psychophys 1991, 49:83-90.
53. Belopolsky AV, Zwaan L, Theeuwes J, Kramer AF. The size of attentional window modulates attention capture by color singletons. Psychon Bull Rev 2007, 14:934-938.
54. Burnham BR. Displaywide visual features associated with a search display's appearance can mediate attention capture. Psychon Bull Rev 2007, 14:392-422.
55. Corbetta M, Shulman GL. Control of goal-directed and stimulus-driven attention in the brain. Nature Rev Neurosci 2002, 3:201-215.
56. Serences JT, Yantis S. Selective visual attention and perceptual coherence. Trends Cogn Sci 2006, 10:38-45.