X-ray transmission through nanostructured and microstructured CuO materials

Applied Radiation and Isotopes

Volumn 69, Issue 2, 2011, Pages 527-530

  Botelho, M Z ^a   Kunzel R ^b   Okuno, E ^b   Levenhagen, R S ^c   Basegio, T ^d   Bergmann, C P ^d  

^a CENTRO UNIVERSITÁRIO FRANCISCANO   (Brazil)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SÃO PAULO   (Brazil)

^c FEDERAL UNIVERSITY OF SÃO PAULO   (Brazil)

^d FEDERAL UNIVERSITY OF RIO GRANDE DO SUL   (Brazil)

Author keywords

CuO microparticles; CuO nanoparticles; X ray attenuation

Indexed keywords

COPPER OXIDES; GRAIN SIZE AND SHAPE; NANOPARTICLES; PARTICLE SIZE;

AVERAGE GRAIN SIZE; CUO NANOPARTICLES; GRAIN SIZE EFFECT; MEAN PARTICLE SIZE; MICRO-PARTICLES; NANOSIZED MATERIALS; X-RAY ATTENUATION; X-RAY TRANSMISSION;

X RAYS;

COPPER OXIDE; NANOPARTICLE; PROPOLIS;

ARTICLE; COMPTON EFFECT; CONCENTRATION (PARAMETERS); CONTROLLED STUDY; ELECTRIC POTENTIAL; GAMMA RADIATION; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; IONIZATION CHAMBER; MICROTECHNOLOGY; NANOFABRICATION; PARTICLE SIZE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROCESS MODEL; RADIATION ABSORPTION; RADIATION ATTENUATION; RADIATION BEAM; RADIATION ENERGY; X RAY; X RAY SPECTROMETRY;

EID: 78650310062     PISSN: 09698043     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.apradiso.2010.11.002     Document Type: Article

References (12)

1. Berry, P.F., 1970. Particle size heterogeneity phenomena in X-ray analysis. In: Third Symposium of Low Energy X- and Gamma Ray Sources and Applications, Boston College Massachusetts.
2. Friedman, H.W., Singh, M.S., 2003. Radiation Transmission Measurements for Demron Fabric, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, CA.
3. Haber F.E., Froyer G. Transparent polymers embedding nanoparticles for X-rays attenuation. Journal of the University of Chemical Technology and Metallurgy 2008, 43(3):283-290.
4. Holynska B. Study of the effect of grain size heterogeneity in the X-ray absorption analysis of simulated aqueous slurries. Spectrochimica Acta 1972, 27B:237-245.
5. Künzel R., Herdade S.B., Costa P.R., Terini R.A., Levenhagen R.S. Ambient dose equivalent and effective dose from scattered X-ray spectra in mammography for Mo/Mo, Mo/Rh and W/Rh anode/filter combinations. Physics in Medicine and Biology 2006, 51:2077-2091.
6. Lines M.G. Nanomaterials for practical functional uses. Journal of Alloys and Compounds 2008, 449:242-245.
7. Moriarty P. Nanostructured materials. Reports on Progress in Physics 2001, 64:297-381.
8. Poole C.P., Owens F.J. Introduction to Nanotechnology 2004, Wiley-Interscience.
9. Scuderi G.J., Brusovanik G.V., Campbell D.R., Henry R.P., Kwone B., Vaccaro A.R. Evaluation of non-lead-based protective radiological material in spinal surgery. The Spine Journal 2006, 6:577-582.
10. Taylor E.W. Organics, polymers and nanotechnology for radiation hardening and shielding applications. SPIE 2007, 6713(671307):1-10.
11. 4 and CoO) and metallic Co powders synthesized by the solution combustion method. Materials Research Bulletin 2010, 45:672-676.
12. Zhu J., Li D., Chen H., Yang X., Lu L., Wang X. Highly dispersed CuO nanoparticles prepared by a novel quick-precipitation method. Materials Letters 2004, 58(26):3324-3327.