Modeling the consequence of increased host tolerance toward avian brood parasitism

Population Ecology

Volumn 53, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 187-193

  Takasu, Fugo ^a,b   Moskát, Csaba ^c  

^a CENTRE FOR ADVANCED STUDY   (Norway)

^b NARA WOMEN'S UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

^c Institute and Museum of Military History Budapest   (Hungary)

Author keywords

Common cuckoo; Great reed warbler; Population dynamics; Recognition; Rejection

Indexed keywords

ABUNDANCE; BIRD; BROOD PARASITISM; DEFENSE BEHAVIOR; ECOLOGICAL MODELING; EMPIRICAL ANALYSIS; EVOLUTIONARY BIOLOGY; HOST-PARASITE INTERACTION; NUMERICAL MODEL; RECOGNITION; REPRODUCTIVE SUCCESS; TOLERANCE;

HUNGARY;

ACROCEPHALUS ARUNDINACEUS; AVES; CUCULUS CANORUS;

EID: 78650307174     PISSN: 14383896     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10144-010-0221-x     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Avilés JM, Stokke BG, Moksnes A, Røskaft E, Åsmul M, Møller AP (2006) Rapid increase in cuckoo egg matching in a recently parasitized reed warbler population. J Evol Biol 19: 1901-1910.
2. Barabás L, Gilicze B, Takasu F, Moskát C (2004) Survival and anti-parasite defense in a host metapopulation under heavy brood parasitism: a source-sink dynamic model. J Ethol 22: 143-151.
3. Cherry MI, Bennett ATD, Moskát C (2007) Do cuckoos choose nests of great reed warblers on the basis of host egg appearance? J Evol Biol 20: 1218-1222.
4. Davies NB (2000) Cuckoos, cowbirds and other cheats. Poyser, London.
5. Davies NB, Brooke M de L (1988) Cuckoos versus reed warblers: adaptations and counteradaptations. Anim Behav 36: 262-284.
6. Davies NB, Brooke M de L (1989a) An experimental study of co-evolution between the cuckoo, Cuculus canorus, and its hosts. I. Host egg discrimination. J Anim Ecol 58: 207-224.
7. Davies NB, Brooke M de L (1989b) An experimental study of co-evolution between the cuckoo, Cuculus canorus, and its hosts. II. Host egg markings, chick discrimination and general discussion. J Anim Ecol 58: 225-236.
8. Dawkins R, Krebs JR (1979) Arms races between and within species. Proc R Soc Lond B 205: 489-511.
9. Getz WM, Mills NJ (1996) Host-parasitoid coexistence and egg-limited encounter rates. Am Nat 148: 301-315.
10. Kleven O, Moksnes A, Røskaft E, Rudolfsen G, Stokke BG, Honza M (2004) Breeding success of common cuckoos Cuculus canorus parasitising four sympatric species of Acrocephalus warblers. J Avian Biol 35: 394-398.
11. Krüger O (2007) Cuckoos, cowbirds and hosts: adaptations, trade-offs and constraints. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B 362: 1873-1886.
12. Langmore NE, Kilner RM (2009) Why do Horsfield's bronze-cuckoo Chalcites basalis eggs mimic those of their hosts? Behav Ecol Sociobiol 63: 1127-1131.
13. Lotem A, Nakamura H, Zahavi A (1995) Constrains on egg discrimination and cuckoo-host co-evolution. Anim Behav 49: 1185-1209.
14. Lovászi P, Moskát C (2004) Break-down of arms race between the red-backed shrike (Lanius collurio) and common cuckoo (Cuculus canorus). Behaviour 141: 245-262.
15. Marchetti K (1992) Costs to host defence and the persistence of parasitic cuckoos. Proc R Soc Lond B 248: 41-45.
16. Moksnes A, Røskaft E (1995) Egg-morphs and host preference in the common cuckoo (Cuculus canorus): an analysis of cuckoo and host eggs from European museum collections. J Zool 236: 625-648.
17. Moksnes A, Røskaft E, Bičík V, Honza M, Øien IJ (1993) Cuckoo Cuculus canorus parasitism on Acrocephalus warblers in southern Moravia in the Czech Republic. J Ornithol 134: 425-434.
18. Moskát C, Honza M (2002) European cuckoo Cuculus canorus parasitism and host's rejection behaviour in a heavily parasitized great reed warbler Acrocephalus arundinaceus population. Ibis 144: 614-622.
19. Moskát C, Hauber ME, Avilés JM, Bán M, Hargitai R, Honza M (2009) Increased host tolerance of multiple cuckoo eggs leads to higher fledging success of the brood parasite. Anim Behav 77: 1281-1290.
20. Murray JD (2007) Mathematical biology: I. An introduction, 3rd edn. Springer, Berlin.
21. Nakamura H, Kubota S, Suzuki R (1998) Coevolution between the common cuckoo and its major hosts in Japan. In: Rothstein SI, Robinson SK (eds) Parasitic birds and their hosts. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 94-112.
22. Nicholson AJ, Bailey VA (1935) The balance of animal populations. Proc Zool Soc Lond 3: 551-598.
23. Rothstein SI (1990) A model system for coevolution: avian brood parasitism. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 21: 481-508.
24. Røskaft E, Takasu F, Moksnes A, Stokke BG (2006) Importance of spatial habitat structure on establishment of host defenses against brood parasitism. Behav Ecol 17: 700-708.
25. Stephens PA, Sutherland WJ, Freckleton RP (1999) What is the Allee effect? Oikos 87: 185-90.
26. Stokke BG, Honza M, Moksnes A, Røskaft E, Rudolfsen G (2002) Costs associated with recognition and rejection of parasitic eggs in two European passerines. Behaviour 139: 629-644.
27. Takasu F (1998) Modelling the arms race in avian brood parasitism. Evol Ecol 12: 969-987.
28. Takasu F (2005) A theoretical consideration on co-evolutionary interactions between avian brood parasites and their hosts. Ornithol Sci 4: 65-72.
29. Takasu F, Moskát C, Muñoz AR, Imanishi S, Nakamura H (2009) Adaptations in the common cuckoo (Cuculus canorus) to host eggs in a multiple-hosts system of brood parasitism. Biol J Linn Soc 98: 291-300.
30. Thompson WR (1929) On the effect of random oviposition on the action of entomophagous parasites as agents of natural control. Parasitology 21: 180-188.
31. Vikan JR, Stokke BG, Fossøy F, Jackson C, Huhta E, Rutila J, Moksnes A, Røskaft E (2009) Fixed rejection responses to single and multiple experimental parasitism in two Fringilla hosts of the common cuckoo. Ethology 115: 840-850.
32. Wyllie I (1981) The cuckoo. Batsford, London.