Technical analysis of accident in chemical process industry and lessons learnt

Chemical Engineering Transactions

Volumn 19, Issue , 2010, Pages 451-456

  Kidam, Kamarizan ^a,b   Hurme, Markku ^a   Hassim, Mimi H ^a,b  

^a AALTO UNIVERSITY   (Finland)

^b UNIVERSITI TEKNOLOGI MALAYSIA   (Malaysia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACCIDENT PREVENTION; CHEMICAL ANALYSIS; CHEMICAL INDUSTRY; SAFETY ENGINEERING;

CAUSES OF ACCIDENTS; CHEMICAL PROCESS INDUSTRY; CONTROL STRATEGIES; ENGINEERING FAILURES; EQUIPMENT FAILURES; INHERENTLY SAFER; RISK REDUCTIONS; TECHNICAL ANALYSIS;

ACCIDENTS;

EID: 78650293111     PISSN: 22839216     EISSN: 22839216     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3303/CET1019074     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (5)

1. th October 2009.
2. Kletz, T. A., 1993, Lessons from Disaster: How Organizations Have No Memory and Accidents Recur. IChemE, Rugby.
3. Kletz, T. A., 2003, Still Going Wrong! Case Histories of Process Plant Disasters and How They Could Have Been Avoided, Gulf- Butterworth Heinemann, Burlington.
4. Kletz, T. A., 2009, Accident reports may not tell us everything we need to know, Journal of Loss Prevention, in the Proc. Ind., doi: 10.1016/j.jlp.2009.08.017
5. Marsh Inc., 1987, A Thirty-Year Review Of One Hundred Of The Largest Property Damage Losses In The Hydrocarbon-Chemical Industries. Marsh Inc., New York.