Real behavior in virtual environments: Psychology experiments in a simple virtual-reality paradigm using video games

Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking

Volumn 13, Issue 6, 2010, Pages 711-714

  Kozlov, Michail D ^a   Johansen, Mark K ^a  

^a CARDIFF UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ARTICLE; BEHAVIOR; COMPUTER INTERFACE; COMPUTER SIMULATION; ENVIRONMENT; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; ORIENTATION; RECREATION;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; BEHAVIOR; COMPUTER SIMULATION; ENVIRONMENT; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; ORIENTATION; USER-COMPUTER INTERFACE; VIDEO GAMES; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 78650290588     PISSN: 21522715     EISSN: 21522723     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1089/cyber.2009.0310     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Entertainment Software Association (2008). Essential facts about the computer and video game industry. www.theesa. com/facts/pdfs/ESA-EF-2008.pdf (accessed May 18, 2009).
2. Darley JM, Batson CD. From Jerusalem to Jericho: A study of situational and dispositional variables in helping behavior. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology 1973; 27:100-8.
3. Latane B, Rodin J. A lady in distress: Inhibiting effects of friends and strangers on bystander intervention. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 1969; 5:189-202.
4. Levine M, Crowther S. The responsive bystander: How so-cial group membership and group size can encourage as well as inhibit bystander intervention. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology 2008; 6:1429-39.
5. Garcia SM, Weaver K, Moskowitz GB, et al. Crowded minds: The implicit bystander effect. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology 2002; 83:843-53.
6. Blascovich J, Loomis J, Beall A, et al. Immersive virtual en-vironment technology as a methodological tool for social psychology. Psychological Inquiry 2002; 13:103-24.
7. Milgram S. Behavioral study of obedience. Journal of Ab-normal & Social Psychology 1963; 67:371-8.
8. Slater M, Antley A, Davison A, et al. A virtual reprise of the Stanley Milgram obedience experiments. PLoS ONE 2006; 1:1-10.
9. Groom CJ, Sherman JW, Conrey FR. What immersive virtual environment technology can offer to social cognition. Psy-chological Inquiry 2002; 13:125-8.
10. Yee N, Bailenson JN, Urbanek M, et al. The unbearable likeness of being digital: The persistence of nonverbal social norms in online virtual environments. CyberPsychology & Behavior 2007; 10:115-21.
11. Peña J, Hancock JT, Merola NA. The priming effects of av-atars in virtual settings. Communication Research 2009; 36:838-56.
12. Latane B, Nida S. Ten years of research on group size and helping. Psychological Bulletin 1981; 2:308-24.
13. Markey PM. Bystander intervention in computer-mediated communication. Computers in Human Behavior 2000; 16: 183-8.
14. Ajzen I. The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior & Human Decision Processes 1991; 50:179-211.
15. Smith SP, Trenholme D. Rapid prototyping a virtual fire drill environment using computer game technology. Fire Safety Journal 2009; 44:559-69.
16. Haney C, Banks WC, Zimbardo PG. Interpersonal dynamics in a simulated prison. International Journal of Criminology & Penology 1973; 1:69-97.