메뉴 건너뛰기




Volumn 20, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 101-110

Welfare properties of restrictions to health care based on cost effectiveness

Author keywords

cost effectiveness; welfare analysis

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; COST EFFECTIVENESS ANALYSIS; HEALTH CARE SYSTEM; HEALTH CARE UTILIZATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; WELFARE;

EID: 78650270729     PISSN: 10579230     EISSN: 10991050     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/hec.1566     Document Type: Article
Times cited : (11)

References (16)
  • 1
    • 67650375960 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Searching for cost effectiveness thresholds in the NHS
    • ISSN 0168-8510, DOI: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2008.12.010.
    • Appleby J, Devlin N, Parkin D, Buxton M, Chalkidou K,. 2009. Searching for cost effectiveness thresholds in the NHS. Health Policy 91 (3): 239-245. ISSN 0168-8510, DOI: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2008.12.010.
    • (2009) Health Policy , vol.91 , Issue.3 , pp. 239-245
    • Appleby, J.1    Devlin, N.2    Parkin, D.3    Buxton, M.4    Chalkidou, K.5
  • 3
    • 2442717630 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Does NICE have a cost-effectiveness threshold and what other factors influence its decisions? A binary choice analysis
    • DOI 10.1002/hec.864
    • Devlin N, Parkin D,. 2004. Does NICE have a cost-effectiveness threshold and what other factors influence its decisions? A binary choice analysis. Health Economics 13 (5): 437-452. (Pubitemid 38660393)
    • (2004) Health Economics , vol.13 , Issue.5 , pp. 437-452
    • Devlin, N.1    Parkin, D.2
  • 4
    • 67650070323 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • A model for NICE in the US
    • DOI: 10.1136/bmj.b2221.
    • Ferner R, McDowell S,. 2009. A model for NICE in the US. British Medical Journal 338: b2221. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.b2221.
    • (2009) British Medical Journal , vol.338
    • Ferner, R.1    McDowell, S.2
  • 6
    • 0031311877 scopus 로고
    • Majority rule and the public provision of private goods
    • Gouveia M,. 1995. Majority rule and the public provision of private goods. Public Choice 93: 221-224.
    • (1995) Public Choice , vol.93 , pp. 221-224
    • Gouveia, M.1
  • 8
    • 33847125745 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • What should (public) health insurance cover?
    • DOI 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2006.08.005, PII S0167629606000932
    • Hoel M,. 2007. What should (public) health insurance cover? Journal of Health Economics 26 (2): 251-262. (Pubitemid 46283047)
    • (2007) Journal of Health Economics , vol.26 , Issue.2 , pp. 251-262
    • Hoel, M.1
  • 9
    • 78650301609 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Pharmaceutical policies in OECD: Reconciling social and industrial goals
    • occasional papers
    • Jacobzone S,. 2000. Pharmaceutical policies in OECD: reconciling social and industrial goals. OECD Labour Market and Social Policy, occasional papers.
    • (2000) OECD Labour Market and Social Policy
    • Jacobzone, S.1
  • 10
    • 85018128622 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Threshold values for cost-effectiveness in health care
    • KCE. Bruxelles
    • KCE. 2008. Threshold values for cost-effectiveness in health care. KCE Reports 100C. Bruxelles.
    • (2008) KCE Reports 100C
  • 12
    • 51149098773 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • The NICE cost-effectiveness threshold: What it is and what that means
    • McCabe C, Claxton K, Culyer AJ,. 2008. The NICE cost-effectiveness threshold: what it is and what that means. Pharmaco Economics 26 (9): 733-744.
    • (2008) Pharmaco Economics , vol.26 , Issue.9 , pp. 733-744
    • McCabe, C.1    Claxton, K.2    Culyer, A.J.3
  • 14
    • 55249123474 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • The use of cost-effectiveness by the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE): No(t yet an) exemplar of a deliberative process
    • Schlander M,. 2008. The use of cost-effectiveness by the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE): no(t yet an) exemplar of a deliberative process. Journal of Medical Ethics 8 (34): 534-539.
    • (2008) Journal of Medical Ethics , vol.8 , Issue.34 , pp. 534-539
    • Schlander, M.1
  • 15
    • 23944456188 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • User charges and priority setting in health care: Balancing equity and efficiency
    • DOI 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2005.01.003, PII S0167629605000172
    • Smith P,. 2005. User charges and priority setting in health care: balancing equity and efficiency. Journal of Health Economics 24: 1018-1029. (Pubitemid 41207908)
    • (2005) Journal of Health Economics , vol.24 , Issue.5 , pp. 1018-1029
    • Smith, P.C.1
  • 16
    • 85014864999 scopus 로고
    • Utility functions that depend on health status: Estimates and economic implications
    • Viscusi WK, Evans WN,. 1990. Utility functions that depend on health status: estimates and economic implications. American Economic Review 80: 353-374.
    • (1990) American Economic Review , vol.80 , pp. 353-374
    • Viscusi, W.K.1    Evans, W.N.2


* 이 정보는 Elsevier사의 SCOPUS DB에서 KISTI가 분석하여 추출한 것입니다.