Coronary branch steal experimental validation and clinical implications of interacting stenosis in branching coronary arteries

Circulation: Cardiovascular Imaging

Volumn 3, Issue 6, 2010, Pages 701-709

  Gould, K Lance ^a   Kirkeeide, Richard ^a   Johnson, Nils P ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

Author keywords

Coronary physiology; Coronary steal; Myocardial perfusion; Quantitative arteriographic analysis

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY; ANESTHESIA; ANGIOCARDIOGRAPHY; ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ANIMAL MODEL; ARTERIOGRAPHY; ARTERY CATHETER; ARTICLE; CALCULATION; CALIBRATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORONARY ARTERY CIRCUMFLEX BRANCH; CORONARY ARTERY OBSTRUCTION; CORONARY FLOW RESERVE; DOG; ELECTROMAGNETIC FLOWMETER; HYPEREMIA; NONHUMAN; POLITEF IMPLANT; POSITRON EMISSION TOMOGRAPHY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; VALIDATION STUDY;

ANIMALS; CORONARY STENOSIS; CORONARY VESSELS; DISEASE MODELS, ANIMAL; DOGS; FEMALE; MALE; POSITRON-EMISSION TOMOGRAPHY; RHEOLOGY; SEVERITY OF ILLNESS INDEX;

EID: 78650256023     PISSN: 19419651     EISSN: 19420080     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1161/CIRCIMAGING.110.937656     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Tonino PA, De Bruyne B, Pijls NH, Siebert U, Ikeno F, van't Veer M, Klauss V, Manoharan G, Engstrom T, Oldroyd KG, Ver Lee PN, MacCarthy PA, Fearon WF. Fractional flow reserve versus angiography for guiding percutaneous coronary intervention. N Engl J Med. 2009;360: 213-224.
2. Pijls NH, van Schaardenburgh P, Manoharan G, Boersma E, Bech JW, van't Veer M, Bar F, Hoorntje J, Koolen J, Wijns W, de Bruyne B. Percutaneous coronary intervention of functionally nonsignificant stenosis: 5-year follow-up of the DEFER Study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2007;49: 2105-2111.
3. Sarno G, Decraemer I, Vanhoenacker PK, De Bruyne B, Hamilos M, Cuisset T, Wyffels E, Bartunek J, Heyndrickx GR, Wijns W. On the inappropriateness of noninvasive multidetector computed tomography coronary angiography to trigger coronary revascularization: a comparison with invasive angiography. J Am Coll Cardiol Cardiovasc Interv. 2009; 2:550-557.
4. Meijboom WB, Van Mieghem CA, van Pelt N, Weustink A, Pugliese F, Mollet NR, Boersma E, Regar E, van Geuns RJ, de Jaegere PJ, Serruys PW, Krestin GP, de Feyter PJ. Comprehensive assessment of coronary artery stenoses: computed tomography coronary angiography versus conventional coronary angiography and correlation with fractional flow reserve in patients with stable angina. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2008;52: 636-643.
5. De Bruyne B, Hersbach F, Pijls NH, Bartunek J, Bech JW, Heyndrickx, Gould KL, Wijns W. Abnormal epicardial coronary resistance in patients with diffuse atherosclerosis but "normal" coronary angiography. Circulation. 2001;104:2401-2406.
6. Di Carli MF, Dorbala S, Meserve J, El Fakhri G, Sitek A, Moore SC. Clinical myocardial perfusion PET/CT. J Nucl Med. 2007;48:783-793.
7. Dorbala S, Hachamovitch R, Curillova Z, Thomas D, Vangala D, Kwong RY, Di Carli MF. Incremental prognostic value of gated Rb-82 positron emission tomography myocardial perfusion imaging over clinical variables and rest LVEF. J Am Coll Cardiol Cardiovasc Imaging. 2009;2: 846-854.
8. Sampson UK, Dorbala S, Limaye A, Kwong R, Di Carli MF. Diagnostic accuracy of rubidium-82 myocardial perfusion imaging with hybrid positron emission tomography/computed tomography in the detection of coronary artery disease. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2007;49:1052-1058.
9. Gould KL. Does coronary flow trump coronary anatomy? J Am Coll Cardiol C Cardiovasc Imaging. 2009;2:1009-1023.
10. Seiler C, Suter TM, Hess OM. Exercise-induced vasomotion of angiographically normal and stenotic coronary arteries improves after cholesterol-lowering drug therapy with bezafibrate. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1995; 26:1615-1622.
11. White CW, Wright CB, Doty DB, Hiratza LF, Eastham CL, Harrison DG, Marcus ML. Does visual interpretation of the coronary arteriogram predict the physiologic importance of a coronary stenosis? N Engl J Med. 1984;310:819-824.
12. Pijls NHJ, van Son JAM, Kirkeeide RL, Bruyne BD, Gould KL. Experimental basis of determining maximal coronary myocardial and collateral blood flow by pressure measurements for assessing functional stenosis severity before and after PTCA. Circulation. 1993;86:1354-1367.
13. De Bruyne B, Pills NH, Heyndrickx GR, Hodeige D, Kirkeeide R, Gould KL. Pressure-derived fractional flow reserve to assess serial epicardial stenoses: theoretical basis and animal validation. Circulation. 2000;101: 1840-1847.
14. Gould KL, Lipscomb K, Hamilton GW. A physiologic basis for assessing critical coronary stenosis: instantaneous flow response and regional distribution during coronary hyperemia as measures of coronary flow reserve. Am J Cardiol. 1974;33:87-94.
15. Gould KL. Pressure-flow characteristics of coronary stenoses in intact unsedated dogs at rest and during coronary vasodilation. Circ Res. 1978; 43:242-253.
16. Gould KL, Kelley KO. Experimental validation of quantitative coronary arteriography for determining pressure-flow characteristics of coronary stenoses. Circulation. 1982;66:930-937.
17. Kirkeeide R, Gould KL, Parsel L. Assessment of coronary stenoses by myocardial imaging during coronary vasodilation, VII: validation of coronary flow reserve as a single integrated measure of stenosis severity accounting for all its geometric dimensions. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1986;7: 103-113.
18. Gould KL, Kirkeeide RL, Buchi M. Coronary flow reserve as a physiologic measure of stenosis severity, part I: relative and absolute coronary flow reserve during changing aortic pressure and cardiac workload; part II: determination from arteriographic stenosis dimensions under standardized conditions. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1990;15:459-474.
19. Gould KL. Coronary Artery Stenosis and Reversing Atherosclerosis. 2nd ed. London: Arnold Publishers, Distributed by Oxford University Press, USA; 1999.
20. Seiler C, Kirkeeide RL, Gould KL. Basic structure-function of the epicardial coronary vascular tree: the basis of quantitative coronary arteriography for diffuse coronary artery disease. Circulation. 1992;85: 1987-2003.
21. Seiler C, Kirkeeide RL, Gould KL. Measurement from arteriograms of regional myocardial bed size distal to any point in the coronary arterial tree for assessing anatomic area at risk. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1993;21: 783-797.
22. Gould KL, Nakagawa Y, Nakagawa N, Sdringola S, Hess MJ, Haynie M, Parker N, Kirkeeide R. Frequency and clinical implications of fluid dynamically significant diffuse coronary artery disease manifest as graded, longitudinal, base to apex, myocardial perfusion abnormalities by non-invasive positron emission tomography. Circulation. 2000;101: 1931-1939.
23. Tsuchiya T, Shimizu M, Yoshio H, Ino H, Okeie K, Yasuda T, Mabuchi H. Quantitative assessment of diffuse coronary artery disease using a three-dimensional reconstruction method compared with intravascular ultrasound images. Coron Artery Dis. 2001;12:127-133.
24. Molloi S, Twong J. Regional blood flow analysis and its relationship with arterial branch lengths and lumen volume in the coronary arterial tree. Phys Med Biol. 2007;52:1495-1503.
25. Zhou Y, Kassab GS, Molloi S. In vivo validation of the design rules of the coronary arteries and their application in the assessment of diffuse disease. Phys Med Biol. 2002;47:977-993.
26. Gould KL, Pan T, Loghin C. Johnson N, Guha A, Sdringola S. Frequent diagnostic errors in cardiac PET-CT due to misregistration of CT attenuation and emission PET Images: a definitive analysis of causes, consequences and corrections. J Nucl Med. 2007;48:1112-1121.
27. Nakagawa Y, Nakagawa K, Sdringola S, Mullani N, Gould KL. A precise three dimensional atlas of myocardial perfusion correlation with coronary arteriographic anatomy. J Nucl Cardiol. 2001;8:580-590.
28. Seiler C. Collateral Circulation of the Heart. London: Springer; 2009.
29. Koo BK. Physiological evaluation of bifurcation lesions using fractional flow reserve. J Intervent Cardiol. 2009;22:110-113.
30. Zhang F, Dong L, Ge J. Simple versus complex stenting strategy for coronary artery bifurcation lesions in the drug-eluting stent era: a metaanalysis of randomised trials. Heart. 2009;95:1676-1681.