Control structure analysis and design for boiler-turbine units

Proceedings of the 29th Chinese Control Conference, CCC'10

Volumn , Issue , 2010, Pages 4958-4963

  Lou, Guannan ^a   Tan, Wen ^a   Fang, Fang ^a  

^a NORTH CHINA ELECTRIC POWER UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

Boiler turbine units; Control structure analysis and design; Coordinated control; Decentralized control; Partially decentralized control

Indexed keywords

BANDWIDTH CONTROL; BOILER TURBINE UNITS; CONTROL STRUCTURE; CONTROL STRUCTURE ANALYSIS AND DESIGN; COORDINATED CONTROL; DECENTRALIZED PID CONTROLLER; ESSENTIAL DYNAMICS; GENERAL MODEL; GRAMIANS; INTERNAL MODEL CONTROL; NON-LINEAR MODEL; PARTIALLY DECENTRALIZED CONTROL; RELATIVE GAINS; SIMULATION RESULT;

CONTROLLERS; DECENTRALIZED CONTROL; INTEGRATED CONTROL; MODEL PREDICTIVE CONTROL; PROPORTIONAL CONTROL SYSTEMS; STRUCTURAL DESIGN; THREE TERM CONTROL SYSTEMS; TURBINES;

BOILER CONTROL;

EID: 78650246556     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (19)

1. Cori R, Maffezzoni C. Practical optimal control of drum boiler power plant[J]. Automatica, 1984, 20: 163-173.
2. Johansson L, Koivo H N. Inverse nyquist array in the design of a multivariable controller for a solid-fuel boiler[J]. International Journal of Control, 1984, 40: 1077-1088.
3. ∞ control for a boiler-turbine unit[C]// Proceedings of IEEE Conference on Control Applications. 1999:219-223.
4. Rossiter J A, Kouvaritakis B, Dunnett, R M. Application of generalized predicative control to a boiler-turbine unit for electricity generation[J]. IEE Proc.-D: Control Theroy Applications, 1991, 138(1): 59-67.
5. Kallappa P, Ray A. Fuzzy wide-range control of fossil power plants for life extension and robust performance[J]. Automatica, 2000, 36(1): 69-82.
6. Robinson D, Chen R, McAvoy T, Schnelle P D. An optimal control based approach to designing plantwide control system architectures [J]. Process Control, 2001, 11(2): 223-236.
7. Bristol E H. On a new measure of interactions for multivariable process control[J]. IEEE Transaction Automation Control, 1966, 11(1): 133-134.
8. McAvoy T, Arkun Y, Chen R, Robinson D, Shnelle P D. A new approach to defining a dynamic relative gain[J]. Control Engineering Practice, 2003, 11(8): 907-914.
9. Xiong Q, Cai W, He M. A practical loop pairing criterion for multivariable process[J]. Journal of Process Control, 2005, 15(7): 741-747.
10. He M J, Cai W J, Ni W, Xie L H. RNGA based control system configuration for multivariable process[J]. Journal of Process Control, 2009, 19(6): 1036-1042.
11. Henning Schmidt, Elling W, Jacobsen. Selecting control configuration for performance with independent design[J]. Journal of Computer and Chemical Engineering, 2003, 27(1): 101-109.
12. Haggblom KE. Partial relative gain: a new tool for control structure selection[C]// Proceeding of AIChE Annual Meeting C. 1997:193-198.
13. Conley A, Salgado M E. Grammian based interaction measure[C]// Proceeding of the 39th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control. 2000: 12-15.
14. F P deMello. Boiler models for system dynamic performance studies[J]. IEEE Trans on Power Systems, 1991, 6(1): 66-74.
15. Cheres E. Small and medium size drum boiler models suitable for long term dynamic response[J]. IEEE Transaction on Power Systems, 1990, 5(4): 686-692.
16. Garcia C E, Morari M. Internal model control design procedure for multivariable system[J]. Ind. Eng. Chem, 1985, 24(2): 472-484.
17. Tan W, Liu J Z, Fang F, Chen Y Q. Tuning of PID controllers for boiler-turbine units[J]. ISA Transactions, 2004, 43: 571-583.