Adjoint sensitivity analysis of contaminant concentrations in water distribution systems

Journal of Engineering Mechanics

Volumn 137, Issue 1, 2010, Pages

  Neupauer, Roseanna M ^a  

^a University of Colorado at Boulder   (United States)

Author keywords

Adjoint state; Mathematical models; Sensitivity analysis; Water distribution systems; Water pollution

Indexed keywords

ADJOINT APPROACH; ADJOINT EQUATIONS; ADJOINT METHODS; ADJOINT MODELS; ADJOINT SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; ADJOINTS; CONTAMINANT CONCENTRATIONS; DIRECT METHOD; MODEL INPUTS; MODEL OUTPUTS; NUMERICAL CALCULATION; SENSITIVITY EQUATIONS; SYSTEM STATE; WATER DISTRIBUTIONS;

COMPUTER SIMULATION; CONTAMINATION; LOCAL AREA NETWORKS; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; OIL SPILLS; REACTION RATES; WATER DISTRIBUTION SYSTEMS; WATER POLLUTION; WATER QUALITY;

SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS;

DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM; NUMERICAL MODEL; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; SIMULATION; WATER POLLUTION;

EID: 78650243846     PISSN: 07339399     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)EM.1943-7889.0000197     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Ahlfeld D.P. Mulvey J.M. Pinder G.F. Wood E.F. Contaminated groundwater remediation design using simulation, optimization, and sensitivity theory. 1. Model development. Water Resour. Res. 1988, 24(3):431-441. WRERAQ, 0043-1397, 10.1029/WR024i003p00431, and.
2. Ding Y. Wang S.S. Y. Optimal control of open-channel flow using adjoint sensitivity analysis. J. Hydraul. Eng. 2006, 132(11):1215-1228. JHEND8, 0733-9429, 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9429(2006)132:11(1215), and.
3. Frind E.O. Muhammad D.S. Molson J.W. Delineation of three-dimensional well capture zones for complex multi-aquifer systems. Ground Water 2002, 40:586-598. GRWAAP, 0017-467X, 10.1111/j.1745-6584.2002.tb02545.x, and.
4. Hill C. Bugnion V. Follows M. Marshall J. Evaluating carbon sequestration efficiency in an ocean circulation model by adjoint sensitivity analysis. J. Geophys. Res. 2004, 109:C11005. JGREA2, 0148-0227, 10.1029/2002JC001598, and.
5. Katopodes N.D. Piasecki M. Site and size optimization of contamination sources in surface water systems. J. Environ. Eng. 1996, 122(10):917-923. JOEEDU, 0733-9372, 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9372(1996)122:10(917), and.
6. Lee B.H. Deininger R.A. Optimal locations of monitoring stations in water distribution systems. J. Environ. Eng. 1992, 118(1):4-16. JOEEDU, 0733-9372, 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9372(1992)118:1(4), and.
7. Liggett J.A. Chen L.-C. Inverse transient analysis in pipe networks. J. Hydraul. Eng. 1994, 120(8):934-955. JHEND8, 0733-9429, 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9429(1994)120:8(934), and.
8. Neupauer R.M. Wilson J.L. Adjoint method for obtaining backward-in-time location and travel time probabilities of a conservative groundwater contaminant. Water Resour. Res. 1999, 35(11):3389-3398. WRERAQ, 0043-1397, 10.1029/1999WR900190, and.
9. Panchang V.G. Richardson J.E. Inverse adjoint estimation of eddy viscosity for coastal flow models. J. Hydraul. Eng. 1993, 119(4):506-524. JHEND8, 0733-9429, 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9429(1993)119:4(506), and.
10. Piasecki M. Optimal wasteload allocation procedure for achieving dissolved oxygen water quality objectives. 1. Sensitivity analysis. J. Environ. Eng. 2004, 130(11):1322-1334. JOEEDU, 0733-9372, 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9372(2004)130:11(1322).
11. Piasecki M. Katopodes N.D. Control of contaminant releases in rivers. 1. Adjoint sensitivity analysis. J. Hydraul. Eng. 1997, 123(6):486-492. JHEND8, 0733-9429, 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9429(1997)123:6(486), and.
12. Piasecki M. Katopodes N.D. Identification of stream dispersion coefficients by adjoint sensitivity method. J. Hydraul. Eng. 1999, 125(7):714-724. JHEND8, 0733-9429, 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9429(1999)125:7(714), and.
13. Rossman L.A. EPANET 2: User manual. 2000, EPA/600/R-00/057, U.S. EPA, Cincinnati.
14. Sanders B.F. Katopodes N.D. Adjoint sensitivity analysis for shallow-water wave control. J. Eng. Mech. 2000, 126(9):909-919. JENMDT, 0733-9399, 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(2000)126:9(909), and.
15. Shang F. Uber J.G. Polycarpou M.M. Particle backtracking algorithm for water distribution system analysis. J. Environ. Eng. 2002, 128(5):441-450. JOEEDU, 0733-9372, 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9372(2002)128:5(441), and.
16. Shen J. Kuo A.Y. Application of inverse method to calibrate estuarine eutrophication model. J. Environ. Eng. 1998, 124(5):409-418. JOEEDU, 0733-9372, 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9372(1998)124:5(409), and.
17. Sun N.-Z. Yeh W.W.-G. Coupled inverse problems in groundwater modeling. 1. Sensitivity analysis and parameter identification. Water Resour. Res. 1990, 26(10):2507-2525. WRERAQ, 0043-1397, and.
18. Sykes J.F. Wilson J.L. Andrews R.W. Sensitivity analysis for steady state groundwater flow using adjoint operators. Water Resour. Res. 1985, 21(3):359-371. WRERAQ, 0043-1397, 10.1029/WR021i003p00359, and.
19. Walksi T.M. Chase D.V. Savic D.A. Grayman W. Bechwith S. Koelle E. Advanced water distribution modeling and management 2003, and Haestad Press, Waterbury, Conn.
20. Wilson J.L. Metcalfe D.E. Illustration and verification of adjoint sensitivity theory for steady state groundwater flow. Water Resour. Res. 1985, 21(11):1602-1610. WRERAQ, 0043-1397, 10.1029/WR021i011p01602, and.
21. Wood D.J. computer program for the analysis of pressure and flow in pipe distribution system 1975, Univ. of Kentucky, Lexington, Ky.
22. Zierolf M.L. Polycarpou M.M. Uber J.G. Development and autocalibration of an input-output model of chlorine transport in drinking water systems. IEEE Trans. Control Syst. Technol. 1998, 6(4):543-553. IETTE2, 1063-6536, 10.1109/87.701351, and.
23. Zwillinger D. Handbook of differential equations 1992, 2nd Ed Academic, San Diego.