A Study on the Pollution and Water Quality Modeling of the River Buyuk Menderes, Turkey

Clean - Soil, Air, Water

Volumn 38, Issue 12, 2010, Pages 1169-1176

  Koç, Cengiz ^a  

^a Department of Regional State Hydraulic Works XXI ^*  (Turkey)

Author keywords

Agriculture; B y k Menderes river; MODQUAL; Pollution; Water quality

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER SIMULATION; EFFLUENT; FERTILIZER; IRRIGATION; NUMERICAL MODEL; PARAMETERIZATION; PESTICIDE; POLLUTANT SOURCE; POLLUTION MONITORING; WATER POLLUTION; WATER QUALITY;

BUYUK MENDERES RIVER; TURKEY;

EID: 78650242806     PISSN: 18630650     EISSN: 18630669     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/clen.201000324     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. K. P. Singh, A. Malik, S. Sinha, Water quality assessment and apportionment of pollution sources of Gomti (India) river using multivariate statistical techniques - a case study, Anal. Chim. Acta 2005, 538, 355- 374.
2. V. Simeonov, J. W. Einax, I. Stanimirova, J. Kraft, Environmetric modeling and interpretation of river water monitoring data, Anal. Bional. Chem. 2002, 374, 898- 905.
3. C. Trisal, T. Tabassum, R. Kumar, Water quality of the river Yamuna in the Delhi stretch: Key determinants and management issues, Clean: Soil Air Water 2008, 36 (3), 306- 314.
4. S. S. Nas, E. Nas, Water quality modeling and dissolved oxygen balance in streams: A point source Streeter-Phelps application in the case of the Harsit stream, Clean: Soil Air Water 2009, 37 (1), 67- 74.
5. CCME, Canadian water quality guidelines for the protection of aquatic life: CCME Water Quality, Index 1.0, User's Manual, in Canadian environmental quality guidelines 1999, Canadian Council of Ministers of the Environment, Winnipeg 2001.
6. S. E. Jorgensen, State-of-the-art of ecological modeling with emphasis on development of structural dynamic models, Ecol. Modell. 1996, 120, 75- 96.
7. C. L. Brown, T. O. Barnwell, The enhanced stream water quality models QUAL2E and QUAL2EUNCAS, in Documentation and User Manual, EPA/600/3-87/007, US Environmental Protection Agency, Environmental Research Laboratory, Athens, GA 1987.
8. R. B. Ambrose, T. Wool, J. L. Martin, WASP5, User's Manual, US Environmental Protection Agency, Environmental Research Laboratory, Athens, GA 1997, p. 1209.
9. USACE, CE-QUAL-RI V1: A dynamic, one-dimensional (longitudinal) water quality model for streams, in User's Manual, Instruction Report EL-95-2, US Army Engineer Waterways Experiment Station, Vicksburg, MS 1995.
10. T. M. Cole, S. A. Wells, CE-QUAL-W2, a two dimensional, laterally averaged, hydrodynamic and water quality model, in Instruction Report EL-2002-1, Version 3.1, US Army Engineering and Research Development Center, Vicksburg, MS 2002.
11. J. L. Martin, T. A. Wool, A dynamic one dimensional model of hydrodynamics and water quality EPD-RIV1, in User's Manual, Version 1.0, AScI Cooperation, Athens, GA 2002.
12. A. Erturk, A. Ekdal, M. Gurel, K. Yucel, A. Tanik, Use of mathematical models to estimate the effect of nutrient loadings on small streams, Fresenius Environ. Bull. 2004, 13 (11b), 1350- 1359.
13. K. J. Musselman, Guidelines for simulation project success, in Proceedings of 1993 Winter Simulation Conference (Eds.: G. W. Evans, M. Mollaghasemi, E. C. Russell, W. E. Biles), Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Piscataway, New Jersey 1993, pp. 58- 64.
14. J. D. Salt, Keynote address: Simulation should be easy and fun!, in Winter Simulation Conference 1993 (Eds.: G. W. Evans, M. Mollaghasemi, E. C. Russell, W. E. Biles), Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Piscataway, New Jersey 1993, pp. 1- 5.
15. S. Robinson, Successful Simulation - A Practical Approach to Simulation Projects, McGraw-Hill, Maidenhead, UK 1994.
16. C. D. Pegden, R. E. Shannon, R. P. Sadowski, Introduction to Simulation Using SIMAN, 2nd edition, McGraw-Hill, New York 1995, p. 839.
17. M. Pidd, Five simple principles of modeling, in Winter Simulation Conference (Eds.: J. M. Charnes, D. M. Morrice, D. T. Brunner, J. J. Swain), Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Piscataway, NJ 1996, pp. 721- 728.
18. L. Chwif, R. J. Paul, On simulation model complexity, in Proceedings of the 2000 Winter Simulation Conference (Eds.: J. A. Joines, R. R. Barton, K. Kang, P. A. Fishwick), Institute of Electronics Engineers, Piscataway, NJ 2000, pp. 449- 455.
19. A. Erturk, M. Gurel, M. A. Baloch, T. Dikerler, A. Ekdal, A. Tanik, D. Z. şeker, Applicability of modeling tools in watershed management for controlling diffuse pollution, Water Sci. Technol. 2006, 56 (1), 147- 154.
20. D. P. Loucks, Water quality models for river systems, in Model for Water Quality Management, McGraw-Hill, London 1981.
21. DSI, Annual evaluation report of irrigation activities in DSI-operated and transferred schemes, General Directorate of State Hydraulic Works (DSI), Operation and Maintenance Department, Ankara 2009, 19.
22. State Institute of Statistics, Municipal Sewerage Questionnaire 2003, State Institute of Statistics, Republic of Turkey, Prime Ministry, Ankara, 2005.
23. Turkish Water Pollution Control Regulation, Official Gazette (dated 4 September 1988, numbered 19919), Ankara 1998.
24. L. A. Roesner, P. R. Giguere, D. E. Evenson, User's Manual for the Stream Quality Model QUAL-II, United States Environmental Protection Agency, Center for Water Quality Modeling, Athens, GA 1977.
25. J. A. Van Pagee, Water quality modeling of the Rhine river and its tributaries in relation to sanitation strategies, Water Sci. Technol. 1984, 16 (5-7), 393- 406.
26. H. Menet, M.Sc. Thesis (in Turkish), ITU, Institute of Science, 1985.
27. C. Koc, Effects on environment and agriculture of geothermal wastewater and boron pollution in Great Menderes basin, Environ. Monitor Assess. 2007, 125, 377- 388.
28. C. Koc, The environmental effects of salinity load in Great Menderes basin irrigation schemes, Environ. Monitor Assess. 2008, 146, 479- 489.