Time-dependent ROC analysis for a three-class prognostic with application to kidney transplantation

Statistics in Medicine

Volumn 29, Issue 30, 2010, Pages 3079-3087

  Foucher, Y ^a   Giral, M ^a   Soulillou, J P ^a   Daures, J P ^b  

^a UNIVERSITÉ DE NANTES   (France)

^b UNIV MONTPELLIER   (France)

Author keywords

Competitive events; Prognostic test; Semi Markovian regression; Survival prediction; Time dependent ROC curves

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY; ARTICLE; DIAGNOSTIC TEST; DIALYSIS; GRAFT FAILURE; GRAFT SURVIVAL; KIDNEY TRANSPLANTATION; MATHEMATICAL ANALYSIS; MEDICAL DECISION MAKING; MEDICAL LITERATURE; MORTALITY; PREDICTION; PROBABILITY; PROGNOSIS; PROPORTIONAL HAZARDS MODEL; RECEIVER OPERATING CHARACTERISTIC; SENSITIVITY AND SENSIBILITY; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; TIME;

CREATININE; FEMALE; HUMANS; KIDNEY TRANSPLANTATION; MALE; MODELS, STATISTICAL; PROGNOSIS; ROC CURVE; SURVIVAL ANALYSIS; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 78650241494     PISSN: 02776715     EISSN: 10970258     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/sim.4052     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Zhou XH, Obuchowski NA, McClish DK. Statistical Methods in Diagnostic Medicine. Wiley-Interscience: New York, 2002.
2. Heagerty PJ, Lumley T, Pepe SP. Time-dependent ROC curves for censored survival data and a diagnostic marker. Biometrics 2000; 56:337-344.
3. Zheng Y, Heagerty PJ. Semiparametric estimation of time-dependent ROC curves for longitudinal marker data. Biostatistics 2004; 5:615-632.
4. Zheng Y, Heagerty PJ. Prospective accuracy for longitudinal markers. Biometrics 2007; 63:332-341.
5. Mossman D. Three-way ROC. Medical Decision Making 1999; 19:78-89.
6. Heckerling PS. Parametric three-way receiver operating characteristic surface analysis using mathematica. Medical Decision Making 2001; 21:409-417.
7. He X, Metz CE, Tsui BM, Links JM, Frey EC. Three-class ROC analysis-a decision theoretic approach under the ideal observer framework. IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging 2006; 25:571-581.
8. Prentice RL, Kalbfleisch JD, Peterson AV, Flournoy N, Farewell VT, Breslow NE. The analysis of failure times in the presence of competing risks. Biometrics 1978; 34:541-554.
9. Li N, Elashoff R, Li G. Robust joint modeling of longitudinal measurements and competing risks failure time data. Biometrical Journal 2009; 51:19-30.
10. Pepe MS, Zheng Y, Jin Y, Huang Y, Parikh C, Levy W. Evaluating the ROC performance of markers for future events. Lifetime Data Analysis 2008; 14:86-113.
11. Saha P, Heagerty PJ. Time-dependent predictive accuracy in the presence of competing risks. Biometrics 2010; DOI: 10.1111/j.1541-0420.2009.01375.x
12. Perez-Ocon R, Ruiz-Castro JE. Semi-Markov Models and Applications. Kluwer Academic Publishers: Dordrecht, Netherlands, 1999.
13. Foucher Y, Mathieu E, Saint-Pierre P, Durand JF, Daures JP. A semi-Markov model based on generalized weibull distribution with an illustration for HIV disease. Biometrical Journal 2005; 47:825-833.
14. Kaplan B, Schold J, Meier-Kriesche HU. Poor predictive value of serum creatinine for renal allograft loss. American Journal of Transplantation 2003; 3:1560-1565.
15. Levey AS, Bosch JP, Lewis JB, Greene T, Rogers N, Roth D. A more accurate method to estimate glomerular filtration rate from serum creatinine: a new prediction equation modification of diet in renal disease study group. Annals of Internal Medicine 1999; 130:461-470.
16. Bagdonavicius V, Nikulin M. Accelerated Life Models. Chapman & Hall, CRC: London, Boca Raton, 2002.
17. Foucher Y, Giral M, Soulillou JP, Daures JP. A flexible semi-Markov model for interval-censored data and goodness-of-fit testing. Statistical Methods in Medical Research 2008; 0:0962280208093889.
18. Joly P, Commenges D. A penalized likelihood approach for a progressive three-state model with censored and truncated data: application to aids. Biometrics 1999; 55:887-890.
19. Song X, Zhou XH. A semiparemtric approach for the covariate specific ROC curve with survival outcome. Statistica Sinica 2008; 18:947-965.